1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2 "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
5 <title>LLVM: Frequently Asked Questions</title>
7 @import url("llvm.css");
8 .question { font-weight: bold }
9 .answer { margin-left: 2em }
14 <div class="doc_title">
15 LLVM: Frequently Asked Questions
19 <li><a href="#license">License</a>
21 <li>Why are the LLVM source code and the front-end distributed under different
23 <li>Does the University of Illinois Open Source License really qualify as an
24 "open source" license?</li>
25 <li>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute the modified source?</li>
26 <li>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute binaries or other tools
27 based on it, without redistributing the source?</li>
30 <li><a href="#source">Source code</a>
32 <li>In what language is LLVM written?</li>
33 <li>How portable is the LLVM source code?</li>
36 <li><a href="#build">Build Problems</a>
38 <li>When I run configure, it finds the wrong C compiler.</li>
39 <li>I compile the code, and I get some error about <tt>/localhome</tt>.</li>
40 <li>The <tt>configure</tt> script finds the right C compiler, but it uses the
41 LLVM linker from a previous build. What do I do?</li>
42 <li>When creating a dynamic library, I get a strange GLIBC error.</li>
43 <li>I've updated my source tree from CVS, and now my build is trying to use a
44 file/directory that doesn't exist.</li>
45 <li>I've modified a Makefile in my source tree, but my build tree keeps using
46 the old version. What do I do?</li>
47 <li>I've upgraded to a new version of LLVM, and I get strange build
49 <li>I've built LLVM and am testing it, but the tests freeze.</li>
50 <li>Why do test results differ when I perform different types of builds?</li>
54 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
55 <div class="doc_section">
56 <a name="license">License</a>
58 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
60 <div class="question">
61 <p>Why are the LLVM source code and the front-end distributed under different
66 <p>The C/C++ front-ends are based on GCC and must be distributed under the GPL.
67 Our aim is to distribute LLVM source code under a <em>much less restrictive</em>
68 license, in particular one that does not compel users who distribute tools based
69 on modifying the source to redistribute the modified source code as well.</p>
72 <div class="question">
73 <p>Does the University of Illinois Open Source License really qualify as an
74 "open source" license?</p>
78 <p>Yes, the license is <a
79 href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/UoI-NCSA.php">certified</a> by the Open
80 Source Initiative (OSI).</p>
83 <div class="question">
84 <p>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute the modified source?</p>
88 <p>Yes. The modified source distribution must retain the copyright notice and
89 follow the three bulletted conditions listed in the <a
90 href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.0/LICENSE.TXT">LLVM license</a>.</p>
93 <div class="question">
94 <p>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute binaries or other tools based
95 on it, without redistributing the source?</p>
99 <p>Yes, this is why we distribute LLVM under a less restrictive license than
100 GPL, as explained in the first question above.</p>
103 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
104 <div class="doc_section">
105 <a name="source">Source Code</a>
107 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
109 <div class="question">
110 <p>In what language is LLVM written?</p>
114 <p>All of the LLVM tools and libraries are written in C++ with extensive use of
118 <div class="question">
119 <p>How portable is the LLVM source code?</p>
123 <p>The LLVM source code should be portable to most modern UNIX-like operating
124 systems. Most of the code is written in standard C++ with operating system
125 services abstracted to a support library. The tools required to build and test
126 LLVM have been ported to a plethora of platforms.</p>
128 <p>Some porting problems may exist in the following areas:</p>
132 <li>The GCC front end code is not as portable as the LLVM suite, so it may not
133 compile as well on unsupported platforms.</li>
135 <li>The Python test classes are more UNIX-centric than they should be, so
136 porting to non-UNIX like platforms (i.e. Windows, MacOS 9) will require some
139 <li>The LLVM build system relies heavily on UNIX shell tools, like the Bourne
140 Shell and sed. Porting to systems without these tools (MacOS 9, Plan 9) will
141 require more effort.</li>
147 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
148 <div class="doc_section">
149 <a name="build">Build Problems</a>
151 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
153 <div class="question">
154 <p>When I run configure, it finds the wrong C compiler.</p>
159 <p>The <tt>configure</tt> script attempts to locate first <tt>gcc</tt> and then
160 <tt>cc</tt>, unless it finds compiler paths set in <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt>
161 for the C and C++ compiler, respectively.</p>
163 <p>If <tt>configure</tt> finds the wrong compiler, either adjust your
164 <tt>PATH</tt> environment variable or set <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt>
169 <div class="question">
170 <p>I compile the code, and I get some error about <tt>/localhome</tt>.</p>
175 <p>There are several possible causes for this. The first is that you didn't set
176 a pathname properly when using <tt>configure</tt>, and it defaulted to a
177 pathname that we use on our research machines.</p>
179 <p>Another possibility is that we hardcoded a path in our Makefiles. If you see
180 this, please email the LLVM bug mailing list with the name of the offending
181 Makefile and a description of what is wrong with it.</p>
185 <div class="question">
186 <p>The <tt>configure</tt> script finds the right C compiler, but it uses the
187 LLVM linker from a previous build. What do I do?</p>
191 <p>The <tt>configure</tt> script uses the <tt>PATH</tt> to find executables, so
192 if it's grabbing the wrong linker/assembler/etc, there are two ways to fix
197 <li><p>Adjust your <tt>PATH</tt> environment variable so that the correct
198 program appears first in the <tt>PATH</tt>. This may work, but may not be
199 convenient when you want them <i>first</i> in your path for other
202 <li><p>Run <tt>configure</tt> with an alternative <tt>PATH</tt> that is
203 correct. In a Borne compatible shell, the syntax would be:</p>
205 <p><tt>PATH=<the path without the bad program> ./configure ...</tt></p>
207 <p>This is still somewhat inconvenient, but it allows <tt>configure</tt>
208 to do its work without having to adjust your <tt>PATH</tt>
209 permanently.</p></li>
215 <div class="question">
216 <p>When creating a dynamic library, I get a strange GLIBC error.</p>
220 <p>Under some operating systems (i.e. Linux), libtool does not work correctly if
221 GCC was compiled with the --disable-shared option. To work around this, install
222 your own version of GCC that has shared libraries enabled by default.</p>
225 <div class="question">
226 <p>I've updated my source tree from CVS, and now my build is trying to use a
227 file/directory that doesn't exist.</p>
231 <p>You need to re-run configure in your object directory. When new Makefiles
232 are added to the source tree, they have to be copied over to the object tree in
233 order to be used by the build.</p>
236 <div class="question">
237 <p>I've modified a Makefile in my source tree, but my build tree keeps using the
238 old version. What do I do?</p>
243 <p>If the Makefile already exists in your object tree, you
244 can just run the following command in the top level directory of your object
247 <p><tt>./config.status <relative path to Makefile></tt><p>
249 <p>If the Makefile is new, you will have to modify the configure script to copy
254 <div class="question">
255 <p>I've upgraded to a new version of LLVM, and I get strange build errors.</p>
260 <p>Sometimes, changes to the LLVM source code alters how the build system works.
261 Changes in libtool, autoconf, or header file dependencies are especially prone
262 to this sort of problem.</p>
264 <p>The best thing to try is to remove the old files and re-build. In most
265 cases, this takes care of the problem. To do this, just type <tt>make
266 clean</tt> and then <tt>make</tt> in the directory that fails to build.</p>
270 <div class="question">
271 <p>I've built LLVM and am testing it, but the tests freeze.</p>
276 <p>This is most likely occurring because you built a profile or release
277 (optimized) build of LLVM and have not specified the same information on the
278 <tt>gmake</tt> command line.</p>
280 <p>For example, if you built LLVM with the command:</p>
282 <p><tt>gmake ENABLE_PROFILING=1</tt>
284 <p>...then you must run the tests with the following commands:</p>
286 <p><tt>cd llvm/test<br>gmake ENABLE_PROFILING=1</tt></p>
290 <div class="question">
291 <p>Why do test results differ when I perform different types of builds?</p>
296 <p>The LLVM test suite is dependent upon several features of the LLVM tools and
299 <p>First, the debugging assertions in code are not enabled in optimized or
300 profiling builds. Hence, tests that used to fail may pass.</p>
302 <p>Second, some tests may rely upon debugging options or behavior that is only
303 available in the debug build. These tests will fail in an optimized or profile
308 <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
311 <div class="doc_footer">
312 <a href="http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu">The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a>
314 Last modified: $Date$