Target Independent Opportunities: ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== FreeBench/mason contains code like this: static p_type m0u(p_type p) { int m[]={0, 8, 1, 2, 16, 5, 13, 7, 14, 9, 3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 10, 17, 6}; p_type pu; pu.a = m[p.a]; pu.b = m[p.b]; pu.c = m[p.c]; return pu; } We currently compile this into a memcpy from a static array into 'm', then a bunch of loads from m. It would be better to avoid the memcpy and just do loads from the static array. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Make the PPC branch selector target independant //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Get the C front-end to expand hypot(x,y) -> llvm.sqrt(x*x+y*y) when errno and precision don't matter (ffastmath). Misc/mandel will like this. :) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Solve this DAG isel folding deficiency: int X, Y; void fn1(void) { X = X | (Y << 3); } compiles to fn1: movl Y, %eax shll $3, %eax orl X, %eax movl %eax, X ret The problem is the store's chain operand is not the load X but rather a TokenFactor of the load X and load Y, which prevents the folding. There are two ways to fix this: 1. The dag combiner can start using alias analysis to realize that y/x don't alias, making the store to X not dependent on the load from Y. 2. The generated isel could be made smarter in the case it can't disambiguate the pointers. Number 1 is the preferred solution. This has been "fixed" by a TableGen hack. But that is a short term workaround which will be removed once the proper fix is made. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Turn this into a signed shift right in instcombine: int f(unsigned x) { return x >> 31 ? -1 : 0; } http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25600 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01492.html //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// On targets with expensive 64-bit multiply, we could LSR this: for (i = ...; ++i) { x = 1ULL << i; into: long long tmp = 1; for (i = ...; ++i, tmp+=tmp) x = tmp; This would be a win on ppc32, but not x86 or ppc64. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Shrink: (setlt (loadi32 P), 0) -> (setlt (loadi8 Phi), 0) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Reassociate should turn: X*X*X*X -> t=(X*X) (t*t) to eliminate a multiply. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Interesting? testcase for add/shift/mul reassoc: int bar(int x, int y) { return x*x*x+y+x*x*x*x*x*y*y*y*y; } int foo(int z, int n) { return bar(z, n) + bar(2*z, 2*n); } //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// These two functions should generate the same code on big-endian systems: int g(int *j,int *l) { return memcmp(j,l,4); } int h(int *j, int *l) { return *j - *l; } this could be done in SelectionDAGISel.cpp, along with other special cases, for 1,2,4,8 bytes. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// This code: int rot(unsigned char b) { int a = ((b>>1) ^ (b<<7)) & 0xff; return a; } Can be improved in two ways: 1. The instcombiner should eliminate the type conversions. 2. The X86 backend should turn this into a rotate by one bit. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// Add LSR exit value substitution. It'll probably be a win for Ackermann, etc. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// It would be nice to revert this patch: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060213/031986.html And teach the dag combiner enough to simplify the code expanded before legalize. It seems plausible that this knowledge would let it simplify other stuff too. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// The loop unroller should be enhanced to be able to unroll loops that aren't single basic blocks. It should be able to handle stuff like this: for (i = 0; i < c1; ++i) if (c2 & (1 << i)) foo where c1/c2 are constants. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// For packed types, TargetData.cpp::getTypeInfo() returns alignment that is equal to the type size. It works but can be overly conservative as the alignment of specific packed types are target dependent. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// We should add 'unaligned load/store' nodes, and produce them from code like this: v4sf example(float *P) { return (v4sf){P[0], P[1], P[2], P[3] }; } //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// We should constant fold packed type casts at the LLVM level, regardless of the cast. Currently we cannot fold some casts because we don't have TargetData information in the constant folder, so we don't know the endianness of the target! //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//