+<p>One additional option is
+<tt>std::vector<bool></tt>: we discourage its use for two reasons 1) the
+implementation in many common compilers (e.g. commonly available versions of
+GCC) is extremely inefficient and 2) the C++ standards committee is likely to
+deprecate this container and/or change it significantly somehow. In any case,
+please don't use it.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="dss_bitvector">BitVector</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p> The BitVector container provides a fixed size set of bits for manipulation.
+It supports individual bit setting/testing, as well as set operations. The set
+operations take time O(size of bitvector), but operations are performed one word
+at a time, instead of one bit at a time. This makes the BitVector very fast for
+set operations compared to other containers. Use the BitVector when you expect
+the number of set bits to be high (IE a dense set).
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="dss_sparsebitvector">SparseBitVector</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p> The SparseBitVector container is much like BitVector, with one major
+difference: Only the bits that are set, are stored. This makes the
+SparseBitVector much more space efficient than BitVector when the set is sparse,
+as well as making set operations O(number of set bits) instead of O(size of
+universe). The downside to the SparseBitVector is that setting and testing of random bits is O(N), and on large SparseBitVectors, this can be slower than BitVector. In our implementation, setting or testing bits in sorted order
+(either forwards or reverse) is O(1) worst case. Testing and setting bits within 128 bits (depends on size) of the current bit is also O(1). As a general statement, testing/setting bits in a SparseBitVector is O(distance away from last set bit).
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="common">Helpful Hints for Common Operations</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>This section describes how to perform some very simple transformations of
+LLVM code. This is meant to give examples of common idioms used, showing the
+practical side of LLVM transformations. <p> Because this is a "how-to" section,
+you should also read about the main classes that you will be working with. The
+<a href="#coreclasses">Core LLVM Class Hierarchy Reference</a> contains details
+and descriptions of the main classes that you should know about.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- NOTE: this section should be heavy on example code -->
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="inspection">Basic Inspection and Traversal Routines</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>The LLVM compiler infrastructure have many different data structures that may
+be traversed. Following the example of the C++ standard template library, the
+techniques used to traverse these various data structures are all basically the
+same. For a enumerable sequence of values, the <tt>XXXbegin()</tt> function (or
+method) returns an iterator to the start of the sequence, the <tt>XXXend()</tt>
+function returns an iterator pointing to one past the last valid element of the
+sequence, and there is some <tt>XXXiterator</tt> data type that is common
+between the two operations.</p>
+
+<p>Because the pattern for iteration is common across many different aspects of
+the program representation, the standard template library algorithms may be used
+on them, and it is easier to remember how to iterate. First we show a few common
+examples of the data structures that need to be traversed. Other data
+structures are traversed in very similar ways.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_function">Iterating over the </a><a
+ href="#BasicBlock"><tt>BasicBlock</tt></a>s in a <a
+ href="#Function"><tt>Function</tt></a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>It's quite common to have a <tt>Function</tt> instance that you'd like to
+transform in some way; in particular, you'd like to manipulate its
+<tt>BasicBlock</tt>s. To facilitate this, you'll need to iterate over all of
+the <tt>BasicBlock</tt>s that constitute the <tt>Function</tt>. The following is
+an example that prints the name of a <tt>BasicBlock</tt> and the number of
+<tt>Instruction</tt>s it contains:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+// <i>func is a pointer to a Function instance</i>
+for (Function::iterator i = func->begin(), e = func->end(); i != e; ++i)
+ // <i>Print out the name of the basic block if it has one, and then the</i>
+ // <i>number of instructions that it contains</i>
+ llvm::cerr << "Basic block (name=" << i->getName() << ") has "
+ << i->size() << " instructions.\n";
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>Note that i can be used as if it were a pointer for the purposes of
+invoking member functions of the <tt>Instruction</tt> class. This is
+because the indirection operator is overloaded for the iterator
+classes. In the above code, the expression <tt>i->size()</tt> is
+exactly equivalent to <tt>(*i).size()</tt> just like you'd expect.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_basicblock">Iterating over the </a><a
+ href="#Instruction"><tt>Instruction</tt></a>s in a <a
+ href="#BasicBlock"><tt>BasicBlock</tt></a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Just like when dealing with <tt>BasicBlock</tt>s in <tt>Function</tt>s, it's
+easy to iterate over the individual instructions that make up
+<tt>BasicBlock</tt>s. Here's a code snippet that prints out each instruction in
+a <tt>BasicBlock</tt>:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+// <i>blk is a pointer to a BasicBlock instance</i>
+for (BasicBlock::iterator i = blk->begin(), e = blk->end(); i != e; ++i)
+ // <i>The next statement works since operator<<(ostream&,...)</i>
+ // <i>is overloaded for Instruction&</i>
+ llvm::cerr << *i << "\n";
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>However, this isn't really the best way to print out the contents of a
+<tt>BasicBlock</tt>! Since the ostream operators are overloaded for virtually
+anything you'll care about, you could have just invoked the print routine on the
+basic block itself: <tt>llvm::cerr << *blk << "\n";</tt>.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_institer">Iterating over the </a><a
+ href="#Instruction"><tt>Instruction</tt></a>s in a <a
+ href="#Function"><tt>Function</tt></a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>If you're finding that you commonly iterate over a <tt>Function</tt>'s
+<tt>BasicBlock</tt>s and then that <tt>BasicBlock</tt>'s <tt>Instruction</tt>s,
+<tt>InstIterator</tt> should be used instead. You'll need to include <a
+href="/doxygen/InstIterator_8h-source.html"><tt>llvm/Support/InstIterator.h</tt></a>,
+and then instantiate <tt>InstIterator</tt>s explicitly in your code. Here's a
+small example that shows how to dump all instructions in a function to the standard error stream:<p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+#include "<a href="/doxygen/InstIterator_8h-source.html">llvm/Support/InstIterator.h</a>"
+
+// <i>F is a pointer to a Function instance</i>
+for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I)
+ llvm::cerr << *I << "\n";
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>Easy, isn't it? You can also use <tt>InstIterator</tt>s to fill a
+work list with its initial contents. For example, if you wanted to
+initialize a work list to contain all instructions in a <tt>Function</tt>
+F, all you would need to do is something like:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+std::set<Instruction*> worklist;
+// or better yet, SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 64> worklist;
+
+for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I)
+ worklist.insert(&*I);
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>The STL set <tt>worklist</tt> would now contain all instructions in the
+<tt>Function</tt> pointed to by F.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_convert">Turning an iterator into a class pointer (and
+ vice-versa)</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Sometimes, it'll be useful to grab a reference (or pointer) to a class
+instance when all you've got at hand is an iterator. Well, extracting
+a reference or a pointer from an iterator is very straight-forward.
+Assuming that <tt>i</tt> is a <tt>BasicBlock::iterator</tt> and <tt>j</tt>
+is a <tt>BasicBlock::const_iterator</tt>:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Instruction& inst = *i; // <i>Grab reference to instruction reference</i>
+Instruction* pinst = &*i; // <i>Grab pointer to instruction reference</i>
+const Instruction& inst = *j;
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>However, the iterators you'll be working with in the LLVM framework are
+special: they will automatically convert to a ptr-to-instance type whenever they
+need to. Instead of dereferencing the iterator and then taking the address of
+the result, you can simply assign the iterator to the proper pointer type and
+you get the dereference and address-of operation as a result of the assignment
+(behind the scenes, this is a result of overloading casting mechanisms). Thus
+the last line of the last example,</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Instruction *pinst = &*i;
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>is semantically equivalent to</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Instruction *pinst = i;
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>It's also possible to turn a class pointer into the corresponding iterator,
+and this is a constant time operation (very efficient). The following code
+snippet illustrates use of the conversion constructors provided by LLVM
+iterators. By using these, you can explicitly grab the iterator of something
+without actually obtaining it via iteration over some structure:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+void printNextInstruction(Instruction* inst) {
+ BasicBlock::iterator it(inst);
+ ++it; // <i>After this line, it refers to the instruction after *inst</i>
+ if (it != inst->getParent()->end()) llvm::cerr << *it << "\n";
+}
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_complex">Finding call sites: a slightly more complex
+ example</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Say that you're writing a FunctionPass and would like to count all the
+locations in the entire module (that is, across every <tt>Function</tt>) where a
+certain function (i.e., some <tt>Function</tt>*) is already in scope. As you'll
+learn later, you may want to use an <tt>InstVisitor</tt> to accomplish this in a
+much more straight-forward manner, but this example will allow us to explore how
+you'd do it if you didn't have <tt>InstVisitor</tt> around. In pseudo-code, this
+is what we want to do:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+initialize callCounter to zero
+for each Function f in the Module
+ for each BasicBlock b in f
+ for each Instruction i in b
+ if (i is a CallInst and calls the given function)
+ increment callCounter
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>And the actual code is (remember, because we're writing a
+<tt>FunctionPass</tt>, our <tt>FunctionPass</tt>-derived class simply has to
+override the <tt>runOnFunction</tt> method):</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Function* targetFunc = ...;
+
+class OurFunctionPass : public FunctionPass {
+ public:
+ OurFunctionPass(): callCounter(0) { }
+
+ virtual runOnFunction(Function& F) {
+ for (Function::iterator b = F.begin(), be = F.end(); b != be; ++b) {
+ for (BasicBlock::iterator i = b->begin(), ie = b->end(); i != ie; ++i) {
+ if (<a href="#CallInst">CallInst</a>* callInst = <a href="#isa">dyn_cast</a><<a
+ href="#CallInst">CallInst</a>>(&*i)) {
+ // <i>We know we've encountered a call instruction, so we</i>
+ // <i>need to determine if it's a call to the</i>
+ // <i>function pointed to by m_func or not.</i>
+ if (callInst->getCalledFunction() == targetFunc)
+ ++callCounter;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ private:
+ unsigned callCounter;
+};
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="calls_and_invokes">Treating calls and invokes the same way</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>You may have noticed that the previous example was a bit oversimplified in
+that it did not deal with call sites generated by 'invoke' instructions. In
+this, and in other situations, you may find that you want to treat
+<tt>CallInst</tt>s and <tt>InvokeInst</tt>s the same way, even though their
+most-specific common base class is <tt>Instruction</tt>, which includes lots of
+less closely-related things. For these cases, LLVM provides a handy wrapper
+class called <a
+href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1CallSite.html"><tt>CallSite</tt></a>.
+It is essentially a wrapper around an <tt>Instruction</tt> pointer, with some
+methods that provide functionality common to <tt>CallInst</tt>s and
+<tt>InvokeInst</tt>s.</p>
+
+<p>This class has "value semantics": it should be passed by value, not by
+reference and it should not be dynamically allocated or deallocated using
+<tt>operator new</tt> or <tt>operator delete</tt>. It is efficiently copyable,
+assignable and constructable, with costs equivalents to that of a bare pointer.
+If you look at its definition, it has only a single pointer member.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_chains">Iterating over def-use & use-def chains</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Frequently, we might have an instance of the <a
+href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Value.html">Value Class</a> and we want to
+determine which <tt>User</tt>s use the <tt>Value</tt>. The list of all
+<tt>User</tt>s of a particular <tt>Value</tt> is called a <i>def-use</i> chain.
+For example, let's say we have a <tt>Function*</tt> named <tt>F</tt> to a
+particular function <tt>foo</tt>. Finding all of the instructions that
+<i>use</i> <tt>foo</tt> is as simple as iterating over the <i>def-use</i> chain
+of <tt>F</tt>:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Function *F = ...;
+
+for (Value::use_iterator i = F->use_begin(), e = F->use_end(); i != e; ++i)
+ if (Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*i)) {
+ llvm::cerr << "F is used in instruction:\n";
+ llvm::cerr << *Inst << "\n";
+ }
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>Alternately, it's common to have an instance of the <a
+href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1User.html">User Class</a> and need to know what
+<tt>Value</tt>s are used by it. The list of all <tt>Value</tt>s used by a
+<tt>User</tt> is known as a <i>use-def</i> chain. Instances of class
+<tt>Instruction</tt> are common <tt>User</tt>s, so we might want to iterate over
+all of the values that a particular instruction uses (that is, the operands of
+the particular <tt>Instruction</tt>):</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Instruction *pi = ...;
+
+for (User::op_iterator i = pi->op_begin(), e = pi->op_end(); i != e; ++i) {
+ Value *v = *i;
+ // <i>...</i>
+}
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<!--
+ def-use chains ("finding all users of"): Value::use_begin/use_end
+ use-def chains ("finding all values used"): User::op_begin/op_end [op=operand]
+-->
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_preds">Iterating over predecessors &
+successors of blocks</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Iterating over the predecessors and successors of a block is quite easy
+with the routines defined in <tt>"llvm/Support/CFG.h"</tt>. Just use code like
+this to iterate over all predecessors of BB:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
+BasicBlock *BB = ...;
+
+for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), E = pred_end(BB); PI != E; ++PI) {
+ BasicBlock *Pred = *PI;
+ // <i>...</i>
+}
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>Similarly, to iterate over successors use
+succ_iterator/succ_begin/succ_end.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="simplechanges">Making simple changes</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>There are some primitive transformation operations present in the LLVM
+infrastructure that are worth knowing about. When performing
+transformations, it's fairly common to manipulate the contents of basic
+blocks. This section describes some of the common methods for doing so
+and gives example code.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="schanges_creating">Creating and inserting new
+ <tt>Instruction</tt>s</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p><i>Instantiating Instructions</i></p>
+
+<p>Creation of <tt>Instruction</tt>s is straight-forward: simply call the
+constructor for the kind of instruction to instantiate and provide the necessary
+parameters. For example, an <tt>AllocaInst</tt> only <i>requires</i> a
+(const-ptr-to) <tt>Type</tt>. Thus:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+AllocaInst* ai = new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty);
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>will create an <tt>AllocaInst</tt> instance that represents the allocation of
+one integer in the current stack frame, at run time. Each <tt>Instruction</tt>
+subclass is likely to have varying default parameters which change the semantics
+of the instruction, so refer to the <a
+href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Instruction.html">doxygen documentation for the subclass of
+Instruction</a> that you're interested in instantiating.</p>
+
+<p><i>Naming values</i></p>
+
+<p>It is very useful to name the values of instructions when you're able to, as
+this facilitates the debugging of your transformations. If you end up looking
+at generated LLVM machine code, you definitely want to have logical names
+associated with the results of instructions! By supplying a value for the
+<tt>Name</tt> (default) parameter of the <tt>Instruction</tt> constructor, you
+associate a logical name with the result of the instruction's execution at
+run time. For example, say that I'm writing a transformation that dynamically
+allocates space for an integer on the stack, and that integer is going to be
+used as some kind of index by some other code. To accomplish this, I place an
+<tt>AllocaInst</tt> at the first point in the first <tt>BasicBlock</tt> of some
+<tt>Function</tt>, and I'm intending to use it within the same
+<tt>Function</tt>. I might do:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+AllocaInst* pa = new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty, 0, "indexLoc");
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>where <tt>indexLoc</tt> is now the logical name of the instruction's
+execution value, which is a pointer to an integer on the run time stack.</p>
+
+<p><i>Inserting instructions</i></p>
+
+<p>There are essentially two ways to insert an <tt>Instruction</tt>
+into an existing sequence of instructions that form a <tt>BasicBlock</tt>:</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Insertion into an explicit instruction list
+
+ <p>Given a <tt>BasicBlock* pb</tt>, an <tt>Instruction* pi</tt> within that
+ <tt>BasicBlock</tt>, and a newly-created instruction we wish to insert
+ before <tt>*pi</tt>, we do the following: </p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+BasicBlock *pb = ...;
+Instruction *pi = ...;
+Instruction *newInst = new Instruction(...);
+
+pb->getInstList().insert(pi, newInst); // <i>Inserts newInst before pi in pb</i>
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+ <p>Appending to the end of a <tt>BasicBlock</tt> is so common that
+ the <tt>Instruction</tt> class and <tt>Instruction</tt>-derived
+ classes provide constructors which take a pointer to a
+ <tt>BasicBlock</tt> to be appended to. For example code that
+ looked like: </p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+BasicBlock *pb = ...;
+Instruction *newInst = new Instruction(...);
+
+pb->getInstList().push_back(newInst); // <i>Appends newInst to pb</i>
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+ <p>becomes: </p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+BasicBlock *pb = ...;
+Instruction *newInst = new Instruction(..., pb);
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+ <p>which is much cleaner, especially if you are creating
+ long instruction streams.</p></li>
+
+ <li>Insertion into an implicit instruction list
+
+ <p><tt>Instruction</tt> instances that are already in <tt>BasicBlock</tt>s
+ are implicitly associated with an existing instruction list: the instruction
+ list of the enclosing basic block. Thus, we could have accomplished the same
+ thing as the above code without being given a <tt>BasicBlock</tt> by doing:
+ </p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Instruction *pi = ...;
+Instruction *newInst = new Instruction(...);
+
+pi->getParent()->getInstList().insert(pi, newInst);
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+ <p>In fact, this sequence of steps occurs so frequently that the
+ <tt>Instruction</tt> class and <tt>Instruction</tt>-derived classes provide
+ constructors which take (as a default parameter) a pointer to an
+ <tt>Instruction</tt> which the newly-created <tt>Instruction</tt> should
+ precede. That is, <tt>Instruction</tt> constructors are capable of
+ inserting the newly-created instance into the <tt>BasicBlock</tt> of a
+ provided instruction, immediately before that instruction. Using an
+ <tt>Instruction</tt> constructor with a <tt>insertBefore</tt> (default)
+ parameter, the above code becomes:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Instruction* pi = ...;
+Instruction* newInst = new Instruction(..., pi);
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+ <p>which is much cleaner, especially if you're creating a lot of
+ instructions and adding them to <tt>BasicBlock</tt>s.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="schanges_deleting">Deleting <tt>Instruction</tt>s</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Deleting an instruction from an existing sequence of instructions that form a
+<a href="#BasicBlock"><tt>BasicBlock</tt></a> is very straight-forward. First,
+you must have a pointer to the instruction that you wish to delete. Second, you
+need to obtain the pointer to that instruction's basic block. You use the
+pointer to the basic block to get its list of instructions and then use the
+erase function to remove your instruction. For example:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+<a href="#Instruction">Instruction</a> *I = .. ;
+I->eraseFromParent();
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="schanges_replacing">Replacing an <tt>Instruction</tt> with another
+ <tt>Value</tt></a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p><i>Replacing individual instructions</i></p>
+
+<p>Including "<a href="/doxygen/BasicBlockUtils_8h-source.html">llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h</a>"
+permits use of two very useful replace functions: <tt>ReplaceInstWithValue</tt>
+and <tt>ReplaceInstWithInst</tt>.</p>
+
+<h4><a name="schanges_deleting">Deleting <tt>Instruction</tt>s</a></h4>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt>ReplaceInstWithValue</tt>
+
+ <p>This function replaces all uses of a given instruction with a value,
+ and then removes the original instruction. The following example
+ illustrates the replacement of the result of a particular
+ <tt>AllocaInst</tt> that allocates memory for a single integer with a null
+ pointer to an integer.</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+AllocaInst* instToReplace = ...;
+BasicBlock::iterator ii(instToReplace);
+
+ReplaceInstWithValue(instToReplace->getParent()->getInstList(), ii,
+ Constant::getNullValue(PointerType::getUnqual(Type::Int32Ty)));
+</pre></div></li>
+
+ <li><tt>ReplaceInstWithInst</tt>
+
+ <p>This function replaces a particular instruction with another
+ instruction, inserting the new instruction into the basic block at the
+ location where the old instruction was, and replacing any uses of the old
+ instruction with the new instruction. The following example illustrates
+ the replacement of one <tt>AllocaInst</tt> with another.</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+AllocaInst* instToReplace = ...;
+BasicBlock::iterator ii(instToReplace);
+
+ReplaceInstWithInst(instToReplace->getParent()->getInstList(), ii,
+ new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty, 0, "ptrToReplacedInt"));
+</pre></div></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p><i>Replacing multiple uses of <tt>User</tt>s and <tt>Value</tt>s</i></p>
+
+<p>You can use <tt>Value::replaceAllUsesWith</tt> and
+<tt>User::replaceUsesOfWith</tt> to change more than one use at a time. See the
+doxygen documentation for the <a href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Value.html">Value Class</a>
+and <a href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1User.html">User Class</a>, respectively, for more
+information.</p>
+
+<!-- Value::replaceAllUsesWith User::replaceUsesOfWith Point out:
+include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/ especially BasicBlockUtils.h with:
+ReplaceInstWithValue, ReplaceInstWithInst -->
+
+</div>
+
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="schanges_deletingGV">Deleting <tt>GlobalVariable</tt>s</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Deleting a global variable from a module is just as easy as deleting an
+Instruction. First, you must have a pointer to the global variable that you wish
+ to delete. You use this pointer to erase it from its parent, the module.
+ For example:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+<a href="#GlobalVariable">GlobalVariable</a> *GV = .. ;
+
+GV->eraseFromParent();
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="advanced">Advanced Topics</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+This section describes some of the advanced or obscure API's that most clients
+do not need to be aware of. These API's tend manage the inner workings of the
+LLVM system, and only need to be accessed in unusual circumstances.
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="TypeResolve">LLVM Type Resolution</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>
+The LLVM type system has a very simple goal: allow clients to compare types for
+structural equality with a simple pointer comparison (aka a shallow compare).
+This goal makes clients much simpler and faster, and is used throughout the LLVM
+system.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Unfortunately achieving this goal is not a simple matter. In particular,
+recursive types and late resolution of opaque types makes the situation very
+difficult to handle. Fortunately, for the most part, our implementation makes
+most clients able to be completely unaware of the nasty internal details. The
+primary case where clients are exposed to the inner workings of it are when
+building a recursive type. In addition to this case, the LLVM bitcode reader,
+assembly parser, and linker also have to be aware of the inner workings of this
+system.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+For our purposes below, we need three concepts. First, an "Opaque Type" is
+exactly as defined in the <a href="LangRef.html#t_opaque">language
+reference</a>. Second an "Abstract Type" is any type which includes an
+opaque type as part of its type graph (for example "<tt>{ opaque, i32 }</tt>").
+Third, a concrete type is a type that is not an abstract type (e.g. "<tt>{ i32,
+float }</tt>").
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="BuildRecType">Basic Recursive Type Construction</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>
+Because the most common question is "how do I build a recursive type with LLVM",
+we answer it now and explain it as we go. Here we include enough to cause this
+to be emitted to an output .ll file:
+</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+%mylist = type { %mylist*, i32 }
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>
+To build this, use the following LLVM APIs:
+</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+// <i>Create the initial outer struct</i>
+<a href="#PATypeHolder">PATypeHolder</a> StructTy = OpaqueType::get();
+std::vector<const Type*> Elts;
+Elts.push_back(PointerType::getUnqual(StructTy));
+Elts.push_back(Type::Int32Ty);
+StructType *NewSTy = StructType::get(Elts);
+
+// <i>At this point, NewSTy = "{ opaque*, i32 }". Tell VMCore that</i>
+// <i>the struct and the opaque type are actually the same.</i>
+cast<OpaqueType>(StructTy.get())-><a href="#refineAbstractTypeTo">refineAbstractTypeTo</a>(NewSTy);
+
+// <i>NewSTy is potentially invalidated, but StructTy (a <a href="#PATypeHolder">PATypeHolder</a>) is</i>
+// <i>kept up-to-date</i>
+NewSTy = cast<StructType>(StructTy.get());
+
+// <i>Add a name for the type to the module symbol table (optional)</i>
+MyModule->addTypeName("mylist", NewSTy);
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>
+This code shows the basic approach used to build recursive types: build a
+non-recursive type using 'opaque', then use type unification to close the cycle.
+The type unification step is performed by the <tt><a
+href="#refineAbstractTypeTo">refineAbstractTypeTo</a></tt> method, which is
+described next. After that, we describe the <a
+href="#PATypeHolder">PATypeHolder class</a>.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="refineAbstractTypeTo">The <tt>refineAbstractTypeTo</tt> method</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+The <tt>refineAbstractTypeTo</tt> method starts the type unification process.
+While this method is actually a member of the DerivedType class, it is most
+often used on OpaqueType instances. Type unification is actually a recursive
+process. After unification, types can become structurally isomorphic to
+existing types, and all duplicates are deleted (to preserve pointer equality).
+</p>
+
+<p>
+In the example above, the OpaqueType object is definitely deleted.
+Additionally, if there is an "{ \2*, i32}" type already created in the system,
+the pointer and struct type created are <b>also</b> deleted. Obviously whenever
+a type is deleted, any "Type*" pointers in the program are invalidated. As
+such, it is safest to avoid having <i>any</i> "Type*" pointers to abstract types
+live across a call to <tt>refineAbstractTypeTo</tt> (note that non-abstract
+types can never move or be deleted). To deal with this, the <a
+href="#PATypeHolder">PATypeHolder</a> class is used to maintain a stable
+reference to a possibly refined type, and the <a
+href="#AbstractTypeUser">AbstractTypeUser</a> class is used to update more
+complex datastructures.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="PATypeHolder">The PATypeHolder Class</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+PATypeHolder is a form of a "smart pointer" for Type objects. When VMCore
+happily goes about nuking types that become isomorphic to existing types, it
+automatically updates all PATypeHolder objects to point to the new type. In the
+example above, this allows the code to maintain a pointer to the resultant
+resolved recursive type, even though the Type*'s are potentially invalidated.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+PATypeHolder is an extremely light-weight object that uses a lazy union-find
+implementation to update pointers. For example the pointer from a Value to its
+Type is maintained by PATypeHolder objects.
+</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="AbstractTypeUser">The AbstractTypeUser Class</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>
+Some data structures need more to perform more complex updates when types get
+resolved. To support this, a class can derive from the AbstractTypeUser class.
+This class
+allows it to get callbacks when certain types are resolved. To register to get
+callbacks for a particular type, the DerivedType::{add/remove}AbstractTypeUser
+methods can be called on a type. Note that these methods only work for <i>
+ abstract</i> types. Concrete types (those that do not include any opaque
+objects) can never be refined.
+</p>
+</div>
+
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="SymbolTable">The <tt>ValueSymbolTable</tt> and
+ <tt>TypeSymbolTable</tt> classes</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>The <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1ValueSymbolTable.html">
+ValueSymbolTable</a></tt> class provides a symbol table that the <a
+href="#Function"><tt>Function</tt></a> and <a href="#Module">
+<tt>Module</tt></a> classes use for naming value definitions. The symbol table
+can provide a name for any <a href="#Value"><tt>Value</tt></a>.
+The <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1TypeSymbolTable.html">
+TypeSymbolTable</a></tt> class is used by the <tt>Module</tt> class to store
+names for types.</p>
+
+<p>Note that the <tt>SymbolTable</tt> class should not be directly accessed
+by most clients. It should only be used when iteration over the symbol table
+names themselves are required, which is very special purpose. Note that not
+all LLVM
+<tt><a href="#Value">Value</a></tt>s have names, and those without names (i.e. they have
+an empty name) do not exist in the symbol table.
+</p>
+
+<p>These symbol tables support iteration over the values/types in the symbol
+table with <tt>begin/end/iterator</tt> and supports querying to see if a
+specific name is in the symbol table (with <tt>lookup</tt>). The
+<tt>ValueSymbolTable</tt> class exposes no public mutator methods, instead,
+simply call <tt>setName</tt> on a value, which will autoinsert it into the
+appropriate symbol table. For types, use the Module::addTypeName method to
+insert entries into the symbol table.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="UserLayout">The <tt>User</tt> and owned <tt>Use</tt> classes' memory layout</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>The <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1User.html">
+User</a></tt> class provides a basis for expressing the ownership of <tt>User</tt>
+towards other <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Value.html">
+Value</a></tt>s. The <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Use.html">
+Use</a></tt> helper class is employed to do the bookkeeping and to facilitate <i>O(1)</i>
+addition and removal.</p>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="Use2User">Interaction and relationship between <tt>User</tt> and <tt>Use</tt> objects</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+A subclass of <tt>User</tt> can choose between incorporating its <tt>Use</tt> objects
+or refer to them out-of-line by means of a pointer. A mixed variant
+(some <tt>Use</tt>s inline others hung off) is impractical and breaks the invariant
+that the <tt>Use</tt> objects belonging to the same <tt>User</tt> form a contiguous array.
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<p>
+We have 2 different layouts in the <tt>User</tt> (sub)classes:
+<ul>
+<li><p>Layout a)
+The <tt>Use</tt> object(s) are inside (resp. at fixed offset) of the <tt>User</tt>
+object and there are a fixed number of them.</p>
+
+<li><p>Layout b)
+The <tt>Use</tt> object(s) are referenced by a pointer to an
+array from the <tt>User</tt> object and there may be a variable
+number of them.</p>
+</ul>
+<p>
+As of v2.4 each layout still possesses a direct pointer to the
+start of the array of <tt>Use</tt>s. Though not mandatory for layout a),
+we stick to this redundancy for the sake of simplicity.
+The <tt>User</tt> object also stores the number of <tt>Use</tt> objects it
+has. (Theoretically this information can also be calculated
+given the scheme presented below.)</p>
+<p>
+Special forms of allocation operators (<tt>operator new</tt>)
+enforce the following memory layouts:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li><p>Layout a) is modelled by prepending the <tt>User</tt> object by the <tt>Use[]</tt> array.</p>
+
+<pre>
+...---.---.---.---.-------...
+ | P | P | P | P | User
+'''---'---'---'---'-------'''
+</pre>
+
+<li><p>Layout b) is modelled by pointing at the <tt>Use[]</tt> array.</p>
+<pre>
+.-------...
+| User
+'-------'''
+ |
+ v
+ .---.---.---.---...
+ | P | P | P | P |
+ '---'---'---'---'''
+</pre>
+</ul>
+<i>(In the above figures '<tt>P</tt>' stands for the <tt>Use**</tt> that
+ is stored in each <tt>Use</tt> object in the member <tt>Use::Prev</tt>)</i>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="Waymarking">The waymarking algorithm</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+Since the <tt>Use</tt> objects are deprived of the direct (back)pointer to
+their <tt>User</tt> objects, there must be a fast and exact method to
+recover it. This is accomplished by the following scheme:</p>
+</div>
+
+A bit-encoding in the 2 LSBits (least significant bits) of the <tt>Use::Prev</tt> allows to find the
+start of the <tt>User</tt> object:
+<ul>
+<li><tt>00</tt> —> binary digit 0</li>
+<li><tt>01</tt> —> binary digit 1</li>
+<li><tt>10</tt> —> stop and calculate (<tt>s</tt>)</li>
+<li><tt>11</tt> —> full stop (<tt>S</tt>)</li>
+</ul>
+<p>
+Given a <tt>Use*</tt>, all we have to do is to walk till we get
+a stop and we either have a <tt>User</tt> immediately behind or
+we have to walk to the next stop picking up digits
+and calculating the offset:</p>
+<pre>
+.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.----------------
+| 1 | s | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | s | 1 | 1 | 0 | s | 1 | 1 | s | 1 | S | User (or User*)
+'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'----------------
+ |+15 |+10 |+6 |+3 |+1
+ | | | | |__>
+ | | | |__________>
+ | | |______________________>
+ | |______________________________________>
+ |__________________________________________________________>
+</pre>
+<p>
+Only the significant number of bits need to be stored between the
+stops, so that the <i>worst case is 20 memory accesses</i> when there are
+1000 <tt>Use</tt> objects associated with a <tt>User</tt>.</p>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="ReferenceImpl">Reference implementation</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+The following literate Haskell fragment demonstrates the concept:</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+> import Test.QuickCheck
+>
+> digits :: Int -> [Char] -> [Char]
+> digits 0 acc = '0' : acc
+> digits 1 acc = '1' : acc
+> digits n acc = digits (n `div` 2) $ digits (n `mod` 2) acc
+>
+> dist :: Int -> [Char] -> [Char]
+> dist 0 [] = ['S']
+> dist 0 acc = acc
+> dist 1 acc = let r = dist 0 acc in 's' : digits (length r) r
+> dist n acc = dist (n - 1) $ dist 1 acc
+>
+> takeLast n ss = reverse $ take n $ reverse ss
+>
+> test = takeLast 40 $ dist 20 []
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+Printing <test> gives: <tt>"1s100000s11010s10100s1111s1010s110s11s1S"</tt></p>
+<p>
+The reverse algorithm computes the length of the string just by examining
+a certain prefix:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+> pref :: [Char] -> Int
+> pref "S" = 1
+> pref ('s':'1':rest) = decode 2 1 rest
+> pref (_:rest) = 1 + pref rest
+>
+> decode walk acc ('0':rest) = decode (walk + 1) (acc * 2) rest
+> decode walk acc ('1':rest) = decode (walk + 1) (acc * 2 + 1) rest
+> decode walk acc _ = walk + acc
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+Now, as expected, printing <pref test> gives <tt>40</tt>.</p>
+<p>
+We can <i>quickCheck</i> this with following property:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+> testcase = dist 2000 []
+> testcaseLength = length testcase
+>
+> identityProp n = n > 0 && n <= testcaseLength ==> length arr == pref arr
+> where arr = takeLast n testcase
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+As expected <quickCheck identityProp> gives:</p>
+
+<pre>
+*Main> quickCheck identityProp
+OK, passed 100 tests.
+</pre>
+<p>
+Let's be a bit more exhaustive:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+>
+> deepCheck p = check (defaultConfig { configMaxTest = 500 }) p
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+And here is the result of <deepCheck identityProp>:</p>
+
+<pre>
+*Main> deepCheck identityProp
+OK, passed 500 tests.
+</pre>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="Tagging">Tagging considerations</a>
+</div>
+
+<p>
+To maintain the invariant that the 2 LSBits of each <tt>Use**</tt> in <tt>Use</tt>
+never change after being set up, setters of <tt>Use::Prev</tt> must re-tag the
+new <tt>Use**</tt> on every modification. Accordingly getters must strip the
+tag bits.</p>
+<p>
+For layout b) instead of the <tt>User</tt> we find a pointer (<tt>User*</tt> with LSBit set).
+Following this pointer brings us to the <tt>User</tt>. A portable trick ensures
+that the first bytes of <tt>User</tt> (if interpreted as a pointer) never has
+the LSBit set. (Portability is relying on the fact that all known compilers place the
+<tt>vptr</tt> in the first word of the instances.)</p>
+
+</div>
+
+ <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="coreclasses">The Core LLVM Class Hierarchy Reference </a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p><tt>#include "<a href="/doxygen/Type_8h-source.html">llvm/Type.h</a>"</tt>
+<br>doxygen info: <a href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Type.html">Type Class</a></p>
+
+<p>The Core LLVM classes are the primary means of representing the program
+being inspected or transformed. The core LLVM classes are defined in
+header files in the <tt>include/llvm/</tt> directory, and implemented in
+the <tt>lib/VMCore</tt> directory.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="Type">The <tt>Type</tt> class and Derived Types</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+ <p><tt>Type</tt> is a superclass of all type classes. Every <tt>Value</tt> has
+ a <tt>Type</tt>. <tt>Type</tt> cannot be instantiated directly but only
+ through its subclasses. Certain primitive types (<tt>VoidType</tt>,
+ <tt>LabelType</tt>, <tt>FloatType</tt> and <tt>DoubleType</tt>) have hidden
+ subclasses. They are hidden because they offer no useful functionality beyond
+ what the <tt>Type</tt> class offers except to distinguish themselves from
+ other subclasses of <tt>Type</tt>.</p>
+ <p>All other types are subclasses of <tt>DerivedType</tt>. Types can be
+ named, but this is not a requirement. There exists exactly
+ one instance of a given shape at any one time. This allows type equality to
+ be performed with address equality of the Type Instance. That is, given two
+ <tt>Type*</tt> values, the types are identical if the pointers are identical.
+ </p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="m_Type">Important Public Methods</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt>bool isInteger() const</tt>: Returns true for any integer type.</li>
+
+ <li><tt>bool isFloatingPoint()</tt>: Return true if this is one of the two
+ floating point types.</li>
+
+ <li><tt>bool isAbstract()</tt>: Return true if the type is abstract (contains
+ an OpaqueType anywhere in its definition).</li>
+
+ <li><tt>bool isSized()</tt>: Return true if the type has known size. Things
+ that don't have a size are abstract types, labels and void.</li>
+
+</ul>
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="derivedtypes">Important Derived Types</a>
+</div>
+<div class="doc_text">
+<dl>
+ <dt><tt>IntegerType</tt></dt>
+ <dd>Subclass of DerivedType that represents integer types of any bit width.
+ Any bit width between <tt>IntegerType::MIN_INT_BITS</tt> (1) and
+ <tt>IntegerType::MAX_INT_BITS</tt> (~8 million) can be represented.
+ <ul>
+ <li><tt>static const IntegerType* get(unsigned NumBits)</tt>: get an integer
+ type of a specific bit width.</li>
+ <li><tt>unsigned getBitWidth() const</tt>: Get the bit width of an integer
+ type.</li>
+ </ul>
+ </dd>
+ <dt><tt>SequentialType</tt></dt>
+ <dd>This is subclassed by ArrayType and PointerType
+ <ul>
+ <li><tt>const Type * getElementType() const</tt>: Returns the type of each
+ of the elements in the sequential type. </li>
+ </ul>
+ </dd>
+ <dt><tt>ArrayType</tt></dt>
+ <dd>This is a subclass of SequentialType and defines the interface for array
+ types.
+ <ul>
+ <li><tt>unsigned getNumElements() const</tt>: Returns the number of
+ elements in the array. </li>
+ </ul>
+ </dd>
+ <dt><tt>PointerType</tt></dt>
+ <dd>Subclass of SequentialType for pointer types.</dd>
+ <dt><tt>VectorType</tt></dt>
+ <dd>Subclass of SequentialType for vector types. A
+ vector type is similar to an ArrayType but is distinguished because it is
+ a first class type wherease ArrayType is not. Vector types are used for
+ vector operations and are usually small vectors of of an integer or floating
+ point type.</dd>
+ <dt><tt>StructType</tt></dt>
+ <dd>Subclass of DerivedTypes for struct types.</dd>
+ <dt><tt><a name="FunctionType">FunctionType</a></tt></dt>
+ <dd>Subclass of DerivedTypes for function types.
+ <ul>
+ <li><tt>bool isVarArg() const</tt>: Returns true if its a vararg
+ function</li>
+ <li><tt> const Type * getReturnType() const</tt>: Returns the
+ return type of the function.</li>
+ <li><tt>const Type * getParamType (unsigned i)</tt>: Returns
+ the type of the ith parameter.</li>
+ <li><tt> const unsigned getNumParams() const</tt>: Returns the
+ number of formal parameters.</li>
+ </ul>
+ </dd>
+ <dt><tt>OpaqueType</tt></dt>
+ <dd>Sublcass of DerivedType for abstract types. This class
+ defines no content and is used as a placeholder for some other type. Note
+ that OpaqueType is used (temporarily) during type resolution for forward
+ references of types. Once the referenced type is resolved, the OpaqueType
+ is replaced with the actual type. OpaqueType can also be used for data
+ abstraction. At link time opaque types can be resolved to actual types
+ of the same name.</dd>
+</dl>
+</div>
+
+
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="Module">The <tt>Module</tt> class</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p><tt>#include "<a
+href="/doxygen/Module_8h-source.html">llvm/Module.h</a>"</tt><br> doxygen info:
+<a href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Module.html">Module Class</a></p>
+
+<p>The <tt>Module</tt> class represents the top level structure present in LLVM
+programs. An LLVM module is effectively either a translation unit of the
+original program or a combination of several translation units merged by the
+linker. The <tt>Module</tt> class keeps track of a list of <a
+href="#Function"><tt>Function</tt></a>s, a list of <a
+href="#GlobalVariable"><tt>GlobalVariable</tt></a>s, and a <a
+href="#SymbolTable"><tt>SymbolTable</tt></a>. Additionally, it contains a few
+helpful member functions that try to make common operations easy.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="m_Module">Important Public Members of the <tt>Module</tt> class</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt>Module::Module(std::string name = "")</tt></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>Constructing a <a href="#Module">Module</a> is easy. You can optionally
+provide a name for it (probably based on the name of the translation unit).</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt>Module::iterator</tt> - Typedef for function list iterator<br>
+ <tt>Module::const_iterator</tt> - Typedef for const_iterator.<br>
+
+ <tt>begin()</tt>, <tt>end()</tt>
+ <tt>size()</tt>, <tt>empty()</tt>
+
+ <p>These are forwarding methods that make it easy to access the contents of
+ a <tt>Module</tt> object's <a href="#Function"><tt>Function</tt></a>
+ list.</p></li>
+
+ <li><tt>Module::FunctionListType &getFunctionList()</tt>
+
+ <p> Returns the list of <a href="#Function"><tt>Function</tt></a>s. This is
+ necessary to use when you need to update the list or perform a complex
+ action that doesn't have a forwarding method.</p>
+
+ <p><!-- Global Variable --></p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<hr>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt>Module::global_iterator</tt> - Typedef for global variable list iterator<br>
+
+ <tt>Module::const_global_iterator</tt> - Typedef for const_iterator.<br>
+
+ <tt>global_begin()</tt>, <tt>global_end()</tt>
+ <tt>global_size()</tt>, <tt>global_empty()</tt>
+
+ <p> These are forwarding methods that make it easy to access the contents of
+ a <tt>Module</tt> object's <a
+ href="#GlobalVariable"><tt>GlobalVariable</tt></a> list.</p></li>
+
+ <li><tt>Module::GlobalListType &getGlobalList()</tt>
+
+ <p>Returns the list of <a
+ href="#GlobalVariable"><tt>GlobalVariable</tt></a>s. This is necessary to
+ use when you need to update the list or perform a complex action that
+ doesn't have a forwarding method.</p>
+
+ <p><!-- Symbol table stuff --> </p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<hr>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt><a href="#SymbolTable">SymbolTable</a> *getSymbolTable()</tt>
+
+ <p>Return a reference to the <a href="#SymbolTable"><tt>SymbolTable</tt></a>
+ for this <tt>Module</tt>.</p>
+
+ <p><!-- Convenience methods --></p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<hr>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt><a href="#Function">Function</a> *getFunction(const std::string
+ &Name, const <a href="#FunctionType">FunctionType</a> *Ty)</tt>
+
+ <p>Look up the specified function in the <tt>Module</tt> <a
+ href="#SymbolTable"><tt>SymbolTable</tt></a>. If it does not exist, return
+ <tt>null</tt>.</p></li>
+
+ <li><tt><a href="#Function">Function</a> *getOrInsertFunction(const
+ std::string &Name, const <a href="#FunctionType">FunctionType</a> *T)</tt>
+
+ <p>Look up the specified function in the <tt>Module</tt> <a
+ href="#SymbolTable"><tt>SymbolTable</tt></a>. If it does not exist, add an
+ external declaration for the function and return it.</p></li>
+
+ <li><tt>std::string getTypeName(const <a href="#Type">Type</a> *Ty)</tt>
+
+ <p>If there is at least one entry in the <a
+ href="#SymbolTable"><tt>SymbolTable</tt></a> for the specified <a
+ href="#Type"><tt>Type</tt></a>, return it. Otherwise return the empty
+ string.</p></li>
+
+ <li><tt>bool addTypeName(const std::string &Name, const <a
+ href="#Type">Type</a> *Ty)</tt>
+
+ <p>Insert an entry in the <a href="#SymbolTable"><tt>SymbolTable</tt></a>
+ mapping <tt>Name</tt> to <tt>Ty</tt>. If there is already an entry for this
+ name, true is returned and the <a
+ href="#SymbolTable"><tt>SymbolTable</tt></a> is not modified.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+</div>
+
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="Value">The <tt>Value</tt> class</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p><tt>#include "<a href="/doxygen/Value_8h-source.html">llvm/Value.h</a>"</tt>
+<br>
+doxygen info: <a href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Value.html">Value Class</a></p>
+
+<p>The <tt>Value</tt> class is the most important class in the LLVM Source
+base. It represents a typed value that may be used (among other things) as an
+operand to an instruction. There are many different types of <tt>Value</tt>s,
+such as <a href="#Constant"><tt>Constant</tt></a>s,<a
+href="#Argument"><tt>Argument</tt></a>s. Even <a
+href="#Instruction"><tt>Instruction</tt></a>s and <a
+href="#Function"><tt>Function</tt></a>s are <tt>Value</tt>s.</p>
+
+<p>A particular <tt>Value</tt> may be used many times in the LLVM representation
+for a program. For example, an incoming argument to a function (represented
+with an instance of the <a href="#Argument">Argument</a> class) is "used" by
+every instruction in the function that references the argument. To keep track
+of this relationship, the <tt>Value</tt> class keeps a list of all of the <a
+href="#User"><tt>User</tt></a>s that is using it (the <a
+href="#User"><tt>User</tt></a> class is a base class for all nodes in the LLVM
+graph that can refer to <tt>Value</tt>s). This use list is how LLVM represents
+def-use information in the program, and is accessible through the <tt>use_</tt>*
+methods, shown below.</p>
+
+<p>Because LLVM is a typed representation, every LLVM <tt>Value</tt> is typed,
+and this <a href="#Type">Type</a> is available through the <tt>getType()</tt>
+method. In addition, all LLVM values can be named. The "name" of the
+<tt>Value</tt> is a symbolic string printed in the LLVM code:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+%<b>foo</b> = add i32 1, 2
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p><a name="nameWarning">The name of this instruction is "foo".</a> <b>NOTE</b>
+that the name of any value may be missing (an empty string), so names should
+<b>ONLY</b> be used for debugging (making the source code easier to read,
+debugging printouts), they should not be used to keep track of values or map
+between them. For this purpose, use a <tt>std::map</tt> of pointers to the
+<tt>Value</tt> itself instead.</p>
+
+<p>One important aspect of LLVM is that there is no distinction between an SSA
+variable and the operation that produces it. Because of this, any reference to
+the value produced by an instruction (or the value available as an incoming
+argument, for example) is represented as a direct pointer to the instance of
+the class that
+represents this value. Although this may take some getting used to, it
+simplifies the representation and makes it easier to manipulate.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="m_Value">Important Public Members of the <tt>Value</tt> class</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt>Value::use_iterator</tt> - Typedef for iterator over the
+use-list<br>
+ <tt>Value::use_const_iterator</tt> - Typedef for const_iterator over
+the use-list<br>
+ <tt>unsigned use_size()</tt> - Returns the number of users of the
+value.<br>
+ <tt>bool use_empty()</tt> - Returns true if there are no users.<br>
+ <tt>use_iterator use_begin()</tt> - Get an iterator to the start of
+the use-list.<br>
+ <tt>use_iterator use_end()</tt> - Get an iterator to the end of the
+use-list.<br>
+ <tt><a href="#User">User</a> *use_back()</tt> - Returns the last
+element in the list.
+ <p> These methods are the interface to access the def-use
+information in LLVM. As with all other iterators in LLVM, the naming
+conventions follow the conventions defined by the <a href="#stl">STL</a>.</p>
+ </li>
+ <li><tt><a href="#Type">Type</a> *getType() const</tt>
+ <p>This method returns the Type of the Value.</p>
+ </li>
+ <li><tt>bool hasName() const</tt><br>
+ <tt>std::string getName() const</tt><br>
+ <tt>void setName(const std::string &Name)</tt>
+ <p> This family of methods is used to access and assign a name to a <tt>Value</tt>,
+be aware of the <a href="#nameWarning">precaution above</a>.</p>
+ </li>
+ <li><tt>void replaceAllUsesWith(Value *V)</tt>
+
+ <p>This method traverses the use list of a <tt>Value</tt> changing all <a
+ href="#User"><tt>User</tt>s</a> of the current value to refer to
+ "<tt>V</tt>" instead. For example, if you detect that an instruction always
+ produces a constant value (for example through constant folding), you can
+ replace all uses of the instruction with the constant like this:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+Inst->replaceAllUsesWith(ConstVal);
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+</ul>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="User">The <tt>User</tt> class</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>
+<tt>#include "<a href="/doxygen/User_8h-source.html">llvm/User.h</a>"</tt><br>
+doxygen info: <a href="/doxygen/classllvm_1_1User.html">User Class</a><br>
+Superclass: <a href="#Value"><tt>Value</tt></a></p>
+
+<p>The <tt>User</tt> class is the common base class of all LLVM nodes that may
+refer to <a href="#Value"><tt>Value</tt></a>s. It exposes a list of "Operands"
+that are all of the <a href="#Value"><tt>Value</tt></a>s that the User is
+referring to. The <tt>User</tt> class itself is a subclass of
+<tt>Value</tt>.</p>