- // Determine AntiDepReg's register class, if it is live and is
- // consistently used within a single class.
- const TargetRegisterClass *RC = AntiDepReg != 0 ? Classes[AntiDepReg] : 0;
- assert((AntiDepReg == 0 || RC != NULL) &&
- "Register should be live if it's causing an anti-dependence!");
- if (RC == reinterpret_cast<TargetRegisterClass *>(-1))
- AntiDepReg = 0;
-
- // Look for a suitable register to use to break the anti-depenence.
- //
- // TODO: Instead of picking the first free register, consider which might
- // be the best.
- if (AntiDepReg != 0) {
- for (TargetRegisterClass::iterator R = RC->allocation_order_begin(MF),
- RE = RC->allocation_order_end(MF); R != RE; ++R) {
- unsigned NewReg = *R;
- // Don't replace a register with itself.
- if (NewReg == AntiDepReg) continue;
- // Don't replace a register with one that was recently used to repair
- // an anti-dependence with this AntiDepReg, because that would
- // re-introduce that anti-dependence.
- if (NewReg == LastNewReg[AntiDepReg]) continue;
- // If NewReg is dead and NewReg's most recent def is not before
- // AntiDepReg's kill, it's safe to replace AntiDepReg with NewReg.
- assert(((KillIndices[AntiDepReg] == ~0u) != (DefIndices[AntiDepReg] == ~0u)) &&
- "Kill and Def maps aren't consistent for AntiDepReg!");
- assert(((KillIndices[NewReg] == ~0u) != (DefIndices[NewReg] == ~0u)) &&
- "Kill and Def maps aren't consistent for NewReg!");
- if (KillIndices[NewReg] == ~0u &&
- Classes[NewReg] != reinterpret_cast<TargetRegisterClass *>(-1) &&
- KillIndices[AntiDepReg] <= DefIndices[NewReg]) {
- DEBUG(errs() << "Breaking anti-dependence edge on "
- << TRI->getName(AntiDepReg)
- << " with " << RegRefs.count(AntiDepReg) << " references"
- << " using " << TRI->getName(NewReg) << "!\n");
-
- // Update the references to the old register to refer to the new
- // register.
- std::pair<std::multimap<unsigned, MachineOperand *>::iterator,
- std::multimap<unsigned, MachineOperand *>::iterator>
- Range = RegRefs.equal_range(AntiDepReg);
- for (std::multimap<unsigned, MachineOperand *>::iterator
- Q = Range.first, QE = Range.second; Q != QE; ++Q)
- Q->second->setReg(NewReg);
-
- // We just went back in time and modified history; the
- // liveness information for the anti-depenence reg is now
- // inconsistent. Set the state as if it were dead.
- Classes[NewReg] = Classes[AntiDepReg];
- DefIndices[NewReg] = DefIndices[AntiDepReg];
- KillIndices[NewReg] = KillIndices[AntiDepReg];
- assert(((KillIndices[NewReg] == ~0u) !=
- (DefIndices[NewReg] == ~0u)) &&
- "Kill and Def maps aren't consistent for NewReg!");
-
- Classes[AntiDepReg] = 0;
- DefIndices[AntiDepReg] = KillIndices[AntiDepReg];
- KillIndices[AntiDepReg] = ~0u;
- assert(((KillIndices[AntiDepReg] == ~0u) !=
- (DefIndices[AntiDepReg] == ~0u)) &&
- "Kill and Def maps aren't consistent for AntiDepReg!");
-
- RegRefs.erase(AntiDepReg);
- Changed = true;
- LastNewReg[AntiDepReg] = NewReg;
- break;
+ // Examine all used registers and set/clear kill flag. When a
+ // register is used multiple times we only set the kill flag on
+ // the first use.
+ killedRegs.reset();
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
+ MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
+ if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isUse()) continue;
+ unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
+ if ((Reg == 0) || ReservedRegs.test(Reg)) continue;
+
+ bool kill = false;
+ if (!killedRegs.test(Reg)) {
+ kill = true;
+ // A register is not killed if any subregs are live...
+ for (MCSubRegIterator SubRegs(Reg, TRI); SubRegs.isValid(); ++SubRegs) {
+ if (LiveRegs.test(*SubRegs)) {
+ kill = false;
+ break;
+ }