+void Verifier::visitLandingPadInst(LandingPadInst &LPI) {
+ BasicBlock *BB = LPI.getParent();
+
+ // The landingpad instruction is ill-formed if it doesn't have any clauses and
+ // isn't a cleanup.
+ Assert1(LPI.getNumClauses() > 0 || LPI.isCleanup(),
+ "LandingPadInst needs at least one clause or to be a cleanup.", &LPI);
+
+ // The landingpad instruction defines its parent as a landing pad block. The
+ // landing pad block may be branched to only by the unwind edge of an invoke.
+ for (pred_iterator I = pred_begin(BB), E = pred_end(BB); I != E; ++I) {
+ const InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>((*I)->getTerminator());
+ Assert1(II && II->getUnwindDest() == BB,
+ "Block containing LandingPadInst must be jumped to "
+ "only by the unwind edge of an invoke.", &LPI);
+ }
+
+ // The landingpad instruction must be the first non-PHI instruction in the
+ // block.
+ Assert1(LPI.getParent()->getLandingPadInst() == &LPI,
+ "LandingPadInst not the first non-PHI instruction in the block.",
+ &LPI);
+
+ // The personality functions for all landingpad instructions within the same
+ // function should match.
+ if (PersonalityFn)
+ Assert1(LPI.getPersonalityFn() == PersonalityFn,
+ "Personality function doesn't match others in function", &LPI);
+ PersonalityFn = LPI.getPersonalityFn();
+
+ visitInstruction(LPI);
+}
+