-; This testcase failed due to a bad assertion in SymbolTable.cpp, removed in
-; the 1.20 revision. Basically the symbol table assumed that if there was an
-; abstract type in the symbol table, [in this case for the entry %foo of type
-; void(opaque)* ], that there should have also been named types by now. This
+; This testcase failed due to a bad assertion in SymbolTable.cpp, removed in
+; the 1.20 revision. Basically the symbol table assumed that if there was an
+; abstract type in the symbol table, [in this case for the entry %foo of type
+; void(opaque)* ], that there should have also been named types by now. This