By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
- The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior.
+ The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
+ sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
.. option:: -version
; CHECK: ret i8
}
+The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
+order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
+before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
+vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
+in the natural order:
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+ // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+ struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
+ Foo f; // emit vtable
+ // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
+
+ struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
+ Bar b;
+ // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
+
+
+With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
+orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
+It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
+sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
+
+.. code-block:: llvm
+
+ ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
+ ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
+ ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
+
+In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
+
+``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
+exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
+the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
+occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
+occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
+
+.. code-block:: llvm
+
+ ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
+ ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
+ ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
+
+This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
+
FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
-but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this, FileCheck
-allows named variables to be defined and substituted into patterns. Here is a
-simple example:
+but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
+:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
+patterns. Here is a simple example:
.. code-block:: llvm
The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
-``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". FileCheck variable
-references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can be
-formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name,
+``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
+variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
+be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name,
then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
-FileCheck variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always get the
-latest value. Note that variables are all read at the start of a "``CHECK``"
-line and are all defined at the end. This means that if you have something
-like "``CHECK: [[XYZ:.*]]x[[XYZ]]``", the check line will read the previous
-value of the ``XYZ`` variable and define a new one after the match is
-performed. If you need to do something like this you can probably take
-advantage of the fact that FileCheck is not actually line-oriented when it
-matches, this allows you to define two separate "``CHECK``" lines that match on
-the same line.
+:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
+get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
+were defined on. For example:
+
+.. code-block:: llvm
+
+ ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
+
+Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
+and don't care exactly which register it is.
FileCheck Expressions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~