<li><a href="#build">Build Problems</a>
<ol>
<li>When I run configure, it finds the wrong C compiler.</li>
- <li>I compile the code, and I get some error about <tt>/localhome</tt>.</li>
<li>The <tt>configure</tt> script finds the right C compiler, but it uses the
LLVM linker from a previous build. What do I do?</li>
<li>When creating a dynamic library, I get a strange GLIBC error.</li>
<li><a href="#langs">What source languages are supported?</a></li>
<li><a href="#langhlsupp">What support is there for higher level source
language constructs for building a compiler?</a></li>
+ <li><a href="GetElementPtr.html">I don't understand the GetElementPtr
+ instruction. Help!</a></li>
</ol>
<li><a href="#cfe">Using the GCC Front End</a>
How can I disable all optimizations when compiling code using the LLVM GCC front end?
</li>
+ <li><a href="#translatec++">Can I use LLVM to convert C++ code to C code?</a></li>
+
</ol>
</li>
</div>
-<div class="question">
-<p>I compile the code, and I get some error about <tt>/localhome</tt>.</p>
-</div>
-
-<div class="answer">
-
-<p>There are several possible causes for this. The first is that you didn't set
-a pathname properly when using <tt>configure</tt>, and it defaulted to a
-pathname that we use on our research machines.</p>
-
-<p>Another possibility is that we hardcoded a path in our Makefiles. If you see
-this, please email the LLVM bug mailing list with the name of the offending
-Makefile and a description of what is wrong with it.</p>
-
-</div>
-
<div class="question">
<p>The <tt>configure</tt> script finds the right C compiler, but it uses the
LLVM linker from a previous build. What do I do?</p>
<a href="CompilerDriver.html">compiler driver</a> which simplifies the task
of running optimizations, linking, and executable generation.</p>
</div>
+
+<div class="question"><a name="langhlsupp">
+ <p>I don't understand the GetElementPtr
+ instruction. Help!</a></p>
+</div>
+<div class="answer">
+ <p>See <a href="GetElementPtr.html">The Often Misunderstood GEP
+ Instruction</a>.</li>
+</div>
+
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_section">
<a name="cfe">Using the GCC Front End</a>
<p>
To work around this, perform the following steps:
</p>
-
<ol>
- <li>
- Make sure the CC and CXX environment variables contains the full path to the
- LLVM GCC front end.
- </li>
+ <li>Make sure the CC and CXX environment variables contains the full path to
+ the LLVM GCC front end.</li>
- <li>
- Make sure that the regular C compiler is first in your PATH.
- </li>
+ <li>Make sure that the regular C compiler is first in your PATH. </li>
- <li>
- Add the string "-Wl,-native" to your CFLAGS environment variable.
- </li>
+ <li>Add the string "-Wl,-native" to your CFLAGS environment variable.</li>
</ol>
<p>
-This will allow the gccld linker to create a native code executable instead of
-a shell script that runs the JIT. Creating native code requires standard
-linkage, which in turn will allow the configure script to find out if code is
-not linking on your system because the feature isn't available on your system.
-</p>
+This will allow the <tt>llvm-ld</tt> linker to create a native code executable
+instead of shell script that runs the JIT. Creating native code requires
+standard linkage, which in turn will allow the configure script to find out if
+code is not linking on your system because the feature isn't available on your
+system.</p>
</div>
<div class="question">
</p>
</div>
+
+<div class="question">
+<p>
+<a name="translatec++">Can I use LLVM to convert C++ code to C code?</a>
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="answer">
+<p>Yes, you can use LLVM to convert code from any language LLVM supports to C.
+Note that the generated C code will be very low level (all loops are lowered
+to gotos, etc) and not very pretty (comments are stripped, original source
+formatting is totally lost, variables are renamed, expressions are regrouped),
+so this may not be what you're looking for. However, this is a good way to add
+C++ support for a processor that does not otherwise have a C++ compiler.
+</p>
+
+<p>Use commands like this:</p>
+
+<ol>
+<li><p>Compile your program as normal with llvm-g++:</p></li>
+
+<div class="doc_code">$ llvm-g++ x.cpp -o program</div>
+
+<p>or:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+ llvm-g++ a.cpp -c<br>
+ llvm-g++ b.cpp -c<br>
+ llvm-g++ a.o b.o -o program
+</div>
+
+<p>With llvm-gcc3, this will generate program and program.bc. The .bc file is
+the LLVM version of the program all linked together.</p>
+
+<li><p>Convert the LLVM code to C code, using the LLC tool with the C
+backend:</p></li>
+
+<div class="doc_code">$ llc -march=c program.bc -o program.c</div>
+
+<li><p>Finally, compile the c file:</p></li>
+
+<div class="doc_code">$ cc x.c</div>
+
+</ol>
+
+<p>Note that, by default, the C backend does not support exception handling.
+If you want/need it for a certain program, you can enable it by passing
+"-enable-correct-eh-support" to the llc program. The resultant code will
+use setjmp/longjmp to implement exception support that is correct but
+relatively slow.
+</p>
+
+<p>Also note: this specific sequence of commands won't work if you use a
+function defined in the C++ runtime library (or any other C++ library). To
+access an external C++ library, you must manually
+compile libstdc++ to LLVM bytecode, statically link it into your program, then
+use the commands above to convert the whole result into C code. Alternatively,
+you can compile the libraries and your application into two different chunks
+of C code and link them.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
+
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_section">
<a name="cfe_code">Questions about code generated by the GCC front-end</a>
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff