the same way</a> </li>
<li><a href="#iterate_chains">Iterating over def-use &
use-def chains</a> </li>
+ <li><a href="#iterate_preds">Iterating over predecessors &
+successors of blocks</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="#simplechanges">Making simple changes</a>
<li><a href="#AbstractTypeUser">The AbstractTypeUser Class</a></li>
</ul></li>
- <li><a href="#SymbolTable">The <tt>ValueSymbolTable</tt> and <tt>TypeSymbolTable</tt> classes </a></li>
+ <li><a href="#SymbolTable">The <tt>ValueSymbolTable</tt> and <tt>TypeSymbolTable</tt> classes</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#UserLayout">The <tt>User</tt> and owned <tt>Use</tt> classes' memory layout</a></li>
</ul></li>
<li><a href="#coreclasses">The Core LLVM Class Hierarchy Reference</a>
<div class="doc_author">
<p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a>,
<a href="mailto:dhurjati@cs.uiuc.edu">Dinakar Dhurjati</a>,
- <a href="mailto:jstanley@cs.uiuc.edu">Joel Stanley</a>, and
+ <a href="mailto:ggreif@gmail.com">Gabor Greif</a>,
+ <a href="mailto:jstanley@cs.uiuc.edu">Joel Stanley</a> and
<a href="mailto:rspencer@x10sys.com">Reid Spencer</a></p>
</div>
<dt><tt>cast<></tt>: </dt>
<dd><p>The <tt>cast<></tt> operator is a "checked cast" operation. It
- converts a pointer or reference from a base class to a derived cast, causing
+ converts a pointer or reference from a base class to a derived class, causing
an assertion failure if it is not really an instance of the right type. This
should be used in cases where you have some information that makes you believe
that something is of the right type. An example of the <tt>isa<></tt>
#include "<a href="/doxygen/InstIterator_8h-source.html">llvm/Support/InstIterator.h</a>"
// <i>F is a pointer to a Function instance</i>
-for (inst_iterator i = inst_begin(F), e = inst_end(F); i != e; ++i)
- llvm::cerr << *i << "\n";
+for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I)
+ llvm::cerr << *I << "\n";
</pre>
</div>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
std::set<Instruction*> worklist;
-worklist.insert(inst_begin(F), inst_end(F));
+// or better yet, SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 64> worklist;
+
+for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I)
+ worklist.insert(&*I);
</pre>
</div>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-Instruction* pinst = &*i;
+Instruction *pinst = &*i;
</pre>
</div>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-Instruction* pinst = i;
+Instruction *pinst = i;
</pre>
</div>
virtual runOnFunction(Function& F) {
for (Function::iterator b = F.begin(), be = F.end(); b != be; ++b) {
- for (BasicBlock::iterator i = b->begin(); ie = b->end(); i != ie; ++i) {
+ for (BasicBlock::iterator i = b->begin(), ie = b->end(); i != ie; ++i) {
if (<a href="#CallInst">CallInst</a>* callInst = <a href="#isa">dyn_cast</a><<a
href="#CallInst">CallInst</a>>(&*i)) {
// <i>We know we've encountered a call instruction, so we</i>
// <i>need to determine if it's a call to the</i>
- // <i>function pointed to by m_func or not</i>
-
+ // <i>function pointed to by m_func or not.</i>
if (callInst->getCalledFunction() == targetFunc)
++callCounter;
}
}
private:
- unsigned callCounter;
+ unsigned callCounter;
};
</pre>
</div>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-Function* F = ...;
+Function *F = ...;
for (Value::use_iterator i = F->use_begin(), e = F->use_end(); i != e; ++i)
if (Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*i)) {
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-Instruction* pi = ...;
+Instruction *pi = ...;
for (User::op_iterator i = pi->op_begin(), e = pi->op_end(); i != e; ++i) {
- Value* v = *i;
+ Value *v = *i;
// <i>...</i>
}
</pre>
</div>
+<!--_______________________________________________________________________-->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="iterate_preds">Iterating over predecessors &
+successors of blocks</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Iterating over the predecessors and successors of a block is quite easy
+with the routines defined in <tt>"llvm/Support/CFG.h"</tt>. Just use code like
+this to iterate over all predecessors of BB:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
+BasicBlock *BB = ...;
+
+for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), E = pred_end(BB); PI != E; ++PI) {
+ BasicBlock *Pred = *PI;
+ // <i>...</i>
+}
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>Similarly, to iterate over successors use
+succ_iterator/succ_begin/succ_end.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
<a name="simplechanges">Making simple changes</a>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-AllocaInst* ai = new AllocaInst(Type::IntTy);
+AllocaInst* ai = new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty);
</pre>
</div>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
-AllocaInst* pa = new AllocaInst(Type::IntTy, 0, "indexLoc");
+AllocaInst* pa = new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty, 0, "indexLoc");
</pre>
</div>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
<a href="#Instruction">Instruction</a> *I = .. ;
-<a href="#BasicBlock">BasicBlock</a> *BB = I->getParent();
-
-BB->getInstList().erase(I);
+I->eraseFromParent();
</pre>
</div>
<ul>
<li><tt>ReplaceInstWithValue</tt>
- <p>This function replaces all uses (within a basic block) of a given
- instruction with a value, and then removes the original instruction. The
- following example illustrates the replacement of the result of a particular
+ <p>This function replaces all uses of a given instruction with a value,
+ and then removes the original instruction. The following example
+ illustrates the replacement of the result of a particular
<tt>AllocaInst</tt> that allocates memory for a single integer with a null
pointer to an integer.</p>
BasicBlock::iterator ii(instToReplace);
ReplaceInstWithValue(instToReplace->getParent()->getInstList(), ii,
- Constant::getNullValue(PointerType::get(Type::IntTy)));
+ Constant::getNullValue(PointerType::getUnqual(Type::Int32Ty)));
</pre></div></li>
<li><tt>ReplaceInstWithInst</tt>
<p>This function replaces a particular instruction with another
- instruction. The following example illustrates the replacement of one
- <tt>AllocaInst</tt> with another.</p>
+ instruction, inserting the new instruction into the basic block at the
+ location where the old instruction was, and replacing any uses of the old
+ instruction with the new instruction. The following example illustrates
+ the replacement of one <tt>AllocaInst</tt> with another.</p>
<div class="doc_code">
<pre>
BasicBlock::iterator ii(instToReplace);
ReplaceInstWithInst(instToReplace->getParent()->getInstList(), ii,
- new AllocaInst(Type::IntTy, 0, "ptrToReplacedInt"));
+ new AllocaInst(Type::Int32Ty, 0, "ptrToReplacedInt"));
</pre></div></li>
</ul>
// <i>Create the initial outer struct</i>
<a href="#PATypeHolder">PATypeHolder</a> StructTy = OpaqueType::get();
std::vector<const Type*> Elts;
-Elts.push_back(PointerType::get(StructTy));
-Elts.push_back(Type::IntTy);
+Elts.push_back(PointerType::getUnqual(StructTy));
+Elts.push_back(Type::Int32Ty);
StructType *NewSTy = StructType::get(Elts);
// <i>At this point, NewSTy = "{ opaque*, i32 }". Tell VMCore that</i>
by most clients. It should only be used when iteration over the symbol table
names themselves are required, which is very special purpose. Note that not
all LLVM
-<a href="#Value">Value</a>s have names, and those without names (i.e. they have
+<tt><a href="#Value">Value</a></tt>s have names, and those without names (i.e. they have
an empty name) do not exist in the symbol table.
</p>
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="UserLayout">The <tt>User</tt> and owned <tt>Use</tt> classes' memory layout</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>The <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1User.html">
+User</a></tt> class provides a basis for expressing the ownership of <tt>User</tt>
+towards other <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Value.html">
+Value</a></tt>s. The <tt><a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Use.html">
+Use</a></tt> helper class is employed to do the bookkeeping and to facilitate <i>O(1)</i>
+addition and removal.</p>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="Use2User">Interaction and relationship between <tt>User</tt> and <tt>Use</tt> objects</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+A subclass of <tt>User</tt> can choose between incorporating its <tt>Use</tt> objects
+or refer to them out-of-line by means of a pointer. A mixed variant
+(some <tt>Use</tt>s inline others hung off) is impractical and breaks the invariant
+that the <tt>Use</tt> objects belonging to the same <tt>User</tt> form a contiguous array.
+</p>
+</div>
+
+<p>
+We have 2 different layouts in the <tt>User</tt> (sub)classes:
+<ul>
+<li><p>Layout a)
+The <tt>Use</tt> object(s) are inside (resp. at fixed offset) of the <tt>User</tt>
+object and there are a fixed number of them.</p>
+
+<li><p>Layout b)
+The <tt>Use</tt> object(s) are referenced by a pointer to an
+array from the <tt>User</tt> object and there may be a variable
+number of them.</p>
+</ul>
+<p>
+As of v2.4 each layout still possesses a direct pointer to the
+start of the array of <tt>Use</tt>s. Though not mandatory for layout a),
+we stick to this redundancy for the sake of simplicity.
+The <tt>User</tt> object also stores the number of <tt>Use</tt> objects it
+has. (Theoretically this information can also be calculated
+given the scheme presented below.)</p>
+<p>
+Special forms of allocation operators (<tt>operator new</tt>)
+enforce the following memory layouts:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li><p>Layout a) is modelled by prepending the <tt>User</tt> object by the <tt>Use[]</tt> array.</p>
+
+<pre>
+...---.---.---.---.-------...
+ | P | P | P | P | User
+'''---'---'---'---'-------'''
+</pre>
+
+<li><p>Layout b) is modelled by pointing at the <tt>Use[]</tt> array.</p>
+<pre>
+.-------...
+| User
+'-------'''
+ |
+ v
+ .---.---.---.---...
+ | P | P | P | P |
+ '---'---'---'---'''
+</pre>
+</ul>
+<i>(In the above figures '<tt>P</tt>' stands for the <tt>Use**</tt> that
+ is stored in each <tt>Use</tt> object in the member <tt>Use::Prev</tt>)</i>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="Waymarking">The waymarking algorithm</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+Since the <tt>Use</tt> objects are deprived of the direct (back)pointer to
+their <tt>User</tt> objects, there must be a fast and exact method to
+recover it. This is accomplished by the following scheme:</p>
+</div>
+
+A bit-encoding in the 2 LSBits (least significant bits) of the <tt>Use::Prev</tt> allows to find the
+start of the <tt>User</tt> object:
+<ul>
+<li><tt>00</tt> —> binary digit 0</li>
+<li><tt>01</tt> —> binary digit 1</li>
+<li><tt>10</tt> —> stop and calculate (<tt>s</tt>)</li>
+<li><tt>11</tt> —> full stop (<tt>S</tt>)</li>
+</ul>
+<p>
+Given a <tt>Use*</tt>, all we have to do is to walk till we get
+a stop and we either have a <tt>User</tt> immediately behind or
+we have to walk to the next stop picking up digits
+and calculating the offset:</p>
+<pre>
+.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.---.----------------
+| 1 | s | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | s | 1 | 1 | 0 | s | 1 | 1 | s | 1 | S | User (or User*)
+'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'---'----------------
+ |+15 |+10 |+6 |+3 |+1
+ | | | | |__>
+ | | | |__________>
+ | | |______________________>
+ | |______________________________________>
+ |__________________________________________________________>
+</pre>
+<p>
+Only the significant number of bits need to be stored between the
+stops, so that the <i>worst case is 20 memory accesses</i> when there are
+1000 <tt>Use</tt> objects associated with a <tt>User</tt>.</p>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="ReferenceImpl">Reference implementation</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+<p>
+The following literate Haskell fragment demonstrates the concept:</p>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+> import Test.QuickCheck
+>
+> digits :: Int -> [Char] -> [Char]
+> digits 0 acc = '0' : acc
+> digits 1 acc = '1' : acc
+> digits n acc = digits (n `div` 2) $ digits (n `mod` 2) acc
+>
+> dist :: Int -> [Char] -> [Char]
+> dist 0 [] = ['S']
+> dist 0 acc = acc
+> dist 1 acc = let r = dist 0 acc in 's' : digits (length r) r
+> dist n acc = dist (n - 1) $ dist 1 acc
+>
+> takeLast n ss = reverse $ take n $ reverse ss
+>
+> test = takeLast 40 $ dist 20 []
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+Printing <test> gives: <tt>"1s100000s11010s10100s1111s1010s110s11s1S"</tt></p>
+<p>
+The reverse algorithm computes the length of the string just by examining
+a certain prefix:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+> pref :: [Char] -> Int
+> pref "S" = 1
+> pref ('s':'1':rest) = decode 2 1 rest
+> pref (_:rest) = 1 + pref rest
+>
+> decode walk acc ('0':rest) = decode (walk + 1) (acc * 2) rest
+> decode walk acc ('1':rest) = decode (walk + 1) (acc * 2 + 1) rest
+> decode walk acc _ = walk + acc
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+Now, as expected, printing <pref test> gives <tt>40</tt>.</p>
+<p>
+We can <i>quickCheck</i> this with following property:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+> testcase = dist 2000 []
+> testcaseLength = length testcase
+>
+> identityProp n = n > 0 && n <= testcaseLength ==> length arr == pref arr
+> where arr = takeLast n testcase
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+As expected <quickCheck identityProp> gives:</p>
+
+<pre>
+*Main> quickCheck identityProp
+OK, passed 100 tests.
+</pre>
+<p>
+Let's be a bit more exhaustive:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+>
+> deepCheck p = check (defaultConfig { configMaxTest = 500 }) p
+>
+</pre>
+</div>
+<p>
+And here is the result of <deepCheck identityProp>:</p>
+
+<pre>
+*Main> deepCheck identityProp
+OK, passed 500 tests.
+</pre>
+
+<!-- ______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsubsection">
+ <a name="Tagging">Tagging considerations</a>
+</div>
+
+<p>
+To maintain the invariant that the 2 LSBits of each <tt>Use**</tt> in <tt>Use</tt>
+never change after being set up, setters of <tt>Use::Prev</tt> must re-tag the
+new <tt>Use**</tt> on every modification. Accordingly getters must strip the
+tag bits.</p>
+<p>
+For layout b) instead of the <tt>User</tt> we find a pointer (<tt>User*</tt> with LSBit set).
+Following this pointer brings us to the <tt>User</tt>. A portable trick ensures
+that the first bytes of <tt>User</tt> (if interpreted as a pointer) never has
+the LSBit set. (Portability is relying on the fact that all known compilers place the
+<tt>vptr</tt> in the first word of the instances.)</p>
+
+</div>
+
+ <!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_section">
<a name="coreclasses">The Core LLVM Class Hierarchy Reference </a>
</div>
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="m_Value">Important Public Methods</a>
+ <a name="m_Type">Important Public Methods</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="m_Value">Important Derived Types</a>
+ <a name="derivedtypes">Important Derived Types</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
<dl>
will automatically be inserted into that module's list of
functions.</p></li>
- <li><tt>bool isExternal()</tt>
+ <li><tt>bool isDeclaration()</tt>
<p>Return whether or not the <tt>Function</tt> has a body defined. If the
function is "external", it does not have a body, and thus must be resolved
<hr>
<address>
<a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
- src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"></a>
+ src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss-blue" alt="Valid CSS"></a>
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
- src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01!" /></a>
+ src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01 Strict"></a>
<a href="mailto:dhurjati@cs.uiuc.edu">Dinakar Dhurjati</a> and
<a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff