#define SEEK_MAX SEEK_END
struct fstrim_range {
- uint64_t start;
- uint64_t len;
- uint64_t minlen;
+ __u64 start;
+ __u64 len;
+ __u64 minlen;
};
/* And dynamically-tunable limits and defaults: */
sector_t (*bmap)(struct address_space *, sector_t);
void (*invalidatepage) (struct page *, unsigned long);
int (*releasepage) (struct page *, gfp_t);
+ void (*freepage)(struct page *);
ssize_t (*direct_IO)(int, struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
loff_t offset, unsigned long nr_segs);
int (*get_xip_mem)(struct address_space *, pgoff_t, int,
struct list_head i_wb_list; /* backing dev IO list */
struct list_head i_lru; /* inode LRU list */
struct list_head i_sb_list;
- struct list_head i_dentry;
+ union {
+ struct list_head i_dentry;
+ struct rcu_head i_rcu;
+ };
unsigned long i_ino;
atomic_t i_count;
unsigned int i_nlink;
#else
struct list_head s_files;
#endif
- /* s_dentry_lru and s_nr_dentry_unused are protected by dcache_lock */
+ /* s_dentry_lru, s_nr_dentry_unused protected by dcache.c lru locks */
struct list_head s_dentry_lru; /* unused dentry lru */
int s_nr_dentry_unused; /* # of dentry on lru */
{
ino_t res;
+ /*
+ * Don't strictly need d_lock here? If the parent ino could change
+ * then surely we'd have a deeper race in the caller?
+ */
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
res = dentry->d_parent->d_inode->i_ino;
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);