Relax assertion. In optimized code, it is possible that first instruction is coming...

[oota-llvm.git] / lib / CodeGen / AsmPrinter / AsmPrinterInlineAsm.cpp

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinterInlineAsm.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinterInlineAsm.cpp
index ba6fed2a78ba7eeb66601f0bfd1ac6ea7d89306b..f6f3bae42a80c011bb8305249575d999e07a8a0b 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinterInlineAsm.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinterInlineAsm.cpp
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm(StringRef Str, unsigned LocCookie) const {
   // Tell SrcMgr about this buffer, it takes ownership of the buffer.
   SrcMgr.AddNewSourceBuffer(Buffer, SMLoc());
   
-  AsmParser Parser(SrcMgr, OutContext, OutStreamer, *MAI);
+  AsmParser Parser(TM.getTarget(), SrcMgr, OutContext, OutStreamer, *MAI);
   OwningPtr<TargetAsmParser> TAP(TM.getTarget().createAsmParser(Parser));
   if (!TAP)
     report_fatal_error("Inline asm not supported by this streamer because"
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ void AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm(const MachineInstr *MI) const {
       // Okay, we finally have a value number.  Ask the target to print this
       // operand!
       if (CurVariant == -1 || CurVariant == AsmPrinterVariant) {
-        unsigned OpNo = 1;
+        unsigned OpNo = 2;
 
         bool Error = false;