ARM: improve RTABI 4.2 conformance on Linux

[oota-llvm.git] / lib / CodeGen / CodeGenPrepare.cpp

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
index d5039b2e8517cfdc523e91697ee25ae6a7f23f36..948fddc6ed8d766bd7eeb473d399a22144cd5f9b 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
@@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
   PromotedInsts.clear();
 
   ModifiedDT = false;
-  if (TM) TLI = TM->getTargetLowering();
+  if (TM)
+    TLI = TM->getSubtargetImpl()->getTargetLowering();
   TLInfo = &getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfo>();
   DominatorTreeWrapperPass *DTWP =
       getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
@@ -662,10 +663,13 @@ SinkShiftAndTruncate(BinaryOperator *ShiftI, Instruction *User, ConstantInt *CI,
     if (!ISDOpcode)
       continue;
 
-    // If the use is actually a legal node, there will not be an implicit
-    // truncate.
+    // If the use is actually a legal node, there will not be an
+    // implicit truncate.
+    // FIXME: always querying the result type is just an
+    // approximation; some nodes' legality is determined by the
+    // operand or other means. There's no good way to find out though.
     if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISDOpcode,
-                                     EVT::getEVT(TruncUser->getType())))
+                                     EVT::getEVT(TruncUser->getType(), true)))
       continue;
 
     // Don't bother for PHI nodes.