using namespace llvm;
CriticalAntiDepBreaker::
-CriticalAntiDepBreaker(MachineFunction& MFi) :
+CriticalAntiDepBreaker(MachineFunction& MFi, const RegisterClassInfo &RCI) :
AntiDepBreaker(), MF(MFi),
MRI(MF.getRegInfo()),
TII(MF.getTarget().getInstrInfo()),
TRI(MF.getTarget().getRegisterInfo()),
- AllocatableSet(TRI->getAllocatableSet(MF)),
+ RegClassInfo(RCI),
Classes(TRI->getNumRegs(), static_cast<const TargetRegisterClass *>(0)),
KillIndices(TRI->getNumRegs(), 0),
DefIndices(TRI->getNumRegs(), 0) {}
const TargetRegisterClass *NewRC = 0;
if (i < MI->getDesc().getNumOperands())
- NewRC = MI->getDesc().OpInfo[i].getRegClass(TRI);
+ NewRC = TII->getRegClass(MI->getDesc(), i, TRI);
// For now, only allow the register to be changed if its register
// class is consistent across all uses.
const TargetRegisterClass *NewRC = 0;
if (i < MI->getDesc().getNumOperands())
- NewRC = MI->getDesc().OpInfo[i].getRegClass(TRI);
+ NewRC = TII->getRegClass(MI->getDesc(), i, TRI);
// For now, only allow the register to be changed if its register
// class is consistent across all uses.
}
}
-// Check all machine instructions that define the antidependent register.
-// Return true if any of these instructions define the new register.
+// Check all machine operands that reference the antidependent register and must
+// be replaced by NewReg. Return true if any of their parent instructions may
+// clobber the new register.
+//
+// Note: AntiDepReg may be referenced by a two-address instruction such that
+// it's use operand is tied to a def operand. We guard against the case in which
+// the two-address instruction also defines NewReg, as may happen with
+// pre/postincrement loads. In this case, both the use and def operands are in
+// RegRefs because the def is inserted by PrescanInstruction and not erased
+// during ScanInstruction. So checking for an instructions with definitions of
+// both NewReg and AntiDepReg covers it.
bool
-CriticalAntiDepBreaker::isNewRegModifiedByRefs(RegRefIter RegRefBegin,
- RegRefIter RegRefEnd,
- unsigned NewReg)
+CriticalAntiDepBreaker::isNewRegClobberedByRefs(RegRefIter RegRefBegin,
+ RegRefIter RegRefEnd,
+ unsigned NewReg)
{
for (RegRefIter I = RegRefBegin; I != RegRefEnd; ++I ) {
- MachineOperand *MO = I->second;
- if (MO->isDef()) continue;
- if (MO->getParent()->modifiesRegister(NewReg, TRI))
+ MachineOperand *RefOper = I->second;
+
+ // Don't allow the instruction defining AntiDepReg to earlyclobber its
+ // operands, in case they may be assigned to NewReg. In this case antidep
+ // breaking must fail, but it's too rare to bother optimizing.
+ if (RefOper->isDef() && RefOper->isEarlyClobber())
return true;
+
+ // Handle cases in which this instructions defines NewReg.
+ MachineInstr *MI = RefOper->getParent();
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
+ const MachineOperand &CheckOper = MI->getOperand(i);
+
+ if (!CheckOper.isReg() || !CheckOper.isDef() ||
+ CheckOper.getReg() != NewReg)
+ continue;
+
+ // Don't allow the instruction to define NewReg and AntiDepReg.
+ // When AntiDepReg is renamed it will be an illegal op.
+ if (RefOper->isDef())
+ return true;
+
+ // Don't allow an instruction using AntiDepReg to be earlyclobbered by
+ // NewReg
+ if (CheckOper.isEarlyClobber())
+ return true;
+
+ // Don't allow inline asm to define NewReg at all. Who know what it's
+ // doing with it.
+ if (MI->isInlineAsm())
+ return true;
+ }
}
return false;
}
unsigned LastNewReg,
const TargetRegisterClass *RC)
{
- for (TargetRegisterClass::iterator R = RC->allocation_order_begin(MF),
- RE = RC->allocation_order_end(MF); R != RE; ++R) {
- unsigned NewReg = *R;
- // Don't consider non-allocatable registers
- if (!AllocatableSet.test(NewReg)) continue;
+ ArrayRef<unsigned> Order = RegClassInfo.getOrder(RC);
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i != Order.size(); ++i) {
+ unsigned NewReg = Order[i];
// Don't replace a register with itself.
if (NewReg == AntiDepReg) continue;
// Don't replace a register with one that was recently used to repair
// If any instructions that define AntiDepReg also define the NewReg, it's
// not suitable. For example, Instruction with multiple definitions can
// result in this condition.
- if (isNewRegModifiedByRefs(RegRefBegin, RegRefEnd, NewReg)) continue;
+ if (isNewRegClobberedByRefs(RegRefBegin, RegRefEnd, NewReg)) continue;
// If NewReg is dead and NewReg's most recent def is not before
// AntiDepReg's kill, it's safe to replace AntiDepReg with NewReg.
assert(((KillIndices[AntiDepReg] == ~0u) != (DefIndices[AntiDepReg] == ~0u))
BreakAntiDependencies(const std::vector<SUnit>& SUnits,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator Begin,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator End,
- unsigned InsertPosIndex) {
+ unsigned InsertPosIndex,
+ DbgValueVector &DbgValues) {
// The code below assumes that there is at least one instruction,
// so just duck out immediately if the block is empty.
if (SUnits.empty()) return 0;
if (Edge->getKind() == SDep::Anti) {
AntiDepReg = Edge->getReg();
assert(AntiDepReg != 0 && "Anti-dependence on reg0?");
- if (!AllocatableSet.test(AntiDepReg))
+ if (!RegClassInfo.isAllocatable(AntiDepReg))
// Don't break anti-dependencies on non-allocatable registers.
AntiDepReg = 0;
else if (KeepRegs.count(AntiDepReg))
// as well.
const SUnit *SU = MISUnitMap[Q->second->getParent()];
if (!SU) continue;
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = SU->DbgInstrList.size() ; i < e ; ++i) {
- MachineInstr *DI = SU->DbgInstrList[i];
- assert (DI->getNumOperands()==3 && DI->getOperand(0).isReg() &&
- DI->getOperand(0).getReg()
- && "Non register dbg_value attached to SUnit!");
- if (DI->getOperand(0).getReg() == AntiDepReg)
- DI->getOperand(0).setReg(NewReg);
- }
+ for (DbgValueVector::iterator DVI = DbgValues.begin(),
+ DVE = DbgValues.end(); DVI != DVE; ++DVI)
+ if (DVI->second == Q->second->getParent())
+ UpdateDbgValue(DVI->first, AntiDepReg, NewReg);
}
// We just went back in time and modified history; the
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff