//
// %reg1025 = <sext> %reg1024
// ...
- // %reg1027 = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1025, 4
+ // %reg1027 = COPY %reg1025:4
// %reg1026 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %reg1027, 4
//
// The problem here is that SUBREG_TO_REG is there to assert that an
// implicit zext occurs. It doesn't insert a zext instruction. If we allow
- // the EXTRACT_SUBREG here, it will give us the value after the <sext>,
+ // the COPY here, it will give us the value after the <sext>,
// not the original value of %reg1024 before <sext>.
if (UseMI->getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::SUBREG_TO_REG)
continue;
continue;
unsigned NewVR = MRI->createVirtualRegister(RC);
BuildMI(*UseMBB, UseMI, UseMI->getDebugLoc(),
- TII->get(TargetOpcode::EXTRACT_SUBREG), NewVR)
- .addReg(DstReg).addImm(SubIdx);
+ TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), NewVR)
+ .addReg(DstReg, 0, SubIdx);
UseMO->setReg(NewVR);
++NumReuse;
Changed = true;