SmallPtrSet<SDNode*, 32> &NodesLeadingTo);
void LegalizeSetCCOperands(SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS, SDValue &CC);
+ void LegalizeSetCCCondCode(MVT VT, SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS, SDValue &CC);
+ void LegalizeSetCC(MVT VT, SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS, SDValue &CC) {
+ LegalizeSetCCOperands(LHS, RHS, CC);
+ LegalizeSetCCCondCode(VT, LHS, RHS, CC);
+ }
SDValue ExpandLibCall(RTLIB::Libcall LC, SDNode *Node, bool isSigned,
SDValue &Hi);
if (CFP->isValueValidForType(SVT, CFP->getValueAPF()) &&
// Only do this if the target has a native EXTLOAD instruction from
// smaller type.
- TLI.isLoadXLegal(ISD::EXTLOAD, SVT) &&
+ TLI.isLoadExtLegal(ISD::EXTLOAD, SVT) &&
TLI.ShouldShrinkFPConstant(OrigVT)) {
const Type *SType = SVT.getTypeForMVT();
LLVMC = cast<ConstantFP>(ConstantExpr::getFPTrunc(LLVMC, SType));
Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(3); // RHS
Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(1); // CC
- LegalizeSetCCOperands(Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4);
+ LegalizeSetCC(Node->getValueType(0), Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4);
LastCALLSEQ_END = DAG.getEntryNode();
- // If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCCOperands,
+ // If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC,
// the LHS is a legal SETCC itself. In this case, we need to compare
// the result against zero to select between true and false values.
if (Tmp3.getNode() == 0) {
// nice to have an effective generic way of getting these benefits...
// Until such a way is found, don't insist on promoting i1 here.
(SrcVT != MVT::i1 ||
- TLI.getLoadXAction(ExtType, MVT::i1) == TargetLowering::Promote)) {
+ TLI.getLoadExtAction(ExtType, MVT::i1) == TargetLowering::Promote)) {
// Promote to a byte-sized load if not loading an integral number of
// bytes. For example, promote EXTLOAD:i20 -> EXTLOAD:i24.
unsigned NewWidth = SrcVT.getStoreSizeInBits();
Tmp1 = LegalizeOp(Result);
Tmp2 = LegalizeOp(Ch);
} else {
- switch (TLI.getLoadXAction(ExtType, SrcVT)) {
+ switch (TLI.getLoadExtAction(ExtType, SrcVT)) {
default: assert(0 && "This action is not supported yet!");
case TargetLowering::Custom:
isCustom = true;
Tmp4 = LegalizeOp(Node->getOperand(3)); // False
SDValue CC = Node->getOperand(4);
- LegalizeSetCCOperands(Tmp1, Tmp2, CC);
+ LegalizeSetCC(Node->getValueType(0), Tmp1, Tmp2, CC);
- // If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCCOperands,
+ // If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC,
// the LHS is a legal SETCC itself. In this case, we need to compare
// the result against zero to select between true and false values.
if (Tmp2.getNode() == 0) {
Tmp1 = Node->getOperand(0);
Tmp2 = Node->getOperand(1);
Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(2);
- LegalizeSetCCOperands(Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3);
+ LegalizeSetCC(Node->getValueType(0), Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3);
// If we had to Expand the SetCC operands into a SELECT node, then it may
// not always be possible to return a true LHS & RHS. In this case, just
RHS = Tmp2;
}
+/// LegalizeSetCCCondCode - Legalize a SETCC with given LHS and RHS and
+/// condition code CC on the current target. This routine assumes LHS and rHS
+/// have already been legalized by LegalizeSetCCOperands. It expands SETCC with
+/// illegal condition code into AND / OR of multiple SETCC values.
+void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCCondCode(MVT VT,
+ SDValue &LHS, SDValue &RHS,
+ SDValue &CC) {
+ MVT OpVT = LHS.getValueType();
+ ISD::CondCode CCCode = cast<CondCodeSDNode>(CC)->get();
+ switch (TLI.getCondCodeAction(CCCode, OpVT)) {
+ default: assert(0 && "Unknown condition code action!");
+ case TargetLowering::Legal:
+ // Nothing to do.
+ break;
+ case TargetLowering::Expand: {
+ ISD::CondCode CC1 = ISD::SETCC_INVALID, CC2 = ISD::SETCC_INVALID;
+ unsigned Opc = 0;
+ switch (CCCode) {
+ default: assert(0 && "Don't know how to expand this condition!"); abort();
+ case ISD::SETOEQ: CC1 = ISD::SETEQ; CC2 = ISD::SETO; Opc = ISD::AND; break;
+ case ISD::SETOGT: CC1 = ISD::SETGT; CC2 = ISD::SETO; Opc = ISD::AND; break;
+ case ISD::SETOGE: CC1 = ISD::SETGE; CC2 = ISD::SETO; Opc = ISD::AND; break;
+ case ISD::SETOLT: CC1 = ISD::SETLT; CC2 = ISD::SETO; Opc = ISD::AND; break;
+ case ISD::SETOLE: CC1 = ISD::SETLE; CC2 = ISD::SETO; Opc = ISD::AND; break;
+ case ISD::SETONE: CC1 = ISD::SETNE; CC2 = ISD::SETO; Opc = ISD::AND; break;
+ case ISD::SETUEQ: CC1 = ISD::SETEQ; CC2 = ISD::SETUO; Opc = ISD::OR; break;
+ case ISD::SETUGT: CC1 = ISD::SETGT; CC2 = ISD::SETUO; Opc = ISD::OR; break;
+ case ISD::SETUGE: CC1 = ISD::SETGE; CC2 = ISD::SETUO; Opc = ISD::OR; break;
+ case ISD::SETULT: CC1 = ISD::SETLT; CC2 = ISD::SETUO; Opc = ISD::OR; break;
+ case ISD::SETULE: CC1 = ISD::SETLE; CC2 = ISD::SETUO; Opc = ISD::OR; break;
+ case ISD::SETUNE: CC1 = ISD::SETNE; CC2 = ISD::SETUO; Opc = ISD::OR; break;
+ // FIXME: Implement more expansions.
+ }
+
+ SDValue SetCC1 = DAG.getSetCC(VT, LHS, RHS, CC1);
+ SDValue SetCC2 = DAG.getSetCC(VT, LHS, RHS, CC2);
+ LHS = DAG.getNode(Opc, VT, SetCC1, SetCC2);
+ RHS = SDValue();
+ CC = SDValue();
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
/// EmitStackConvert - Emit a store/load combination to the stack. This stores
/// SrcOp to a stack slot of type SlotVT, truncating it if needed. It then does
/// a load from the stack slot to DestVT, extending it if needed.
Hi = Source;
}
+ // Check to see if the target has a custom way to lower this. If so, use it.
+ // (Note we've already expanded the operand in this case.)
+ switch (TLI.getOperationAction(ISD::UINT_TO_FP, SourceVT)) {
+ default: assert(0 && "This action not implemented for this operation!");
+ case TargetLowering::Legal:
+ case TargetLowering::Expand:
+ break; // This case is handled below.
+ case TargetLowering::Custom: {
+ SDValue NV = TLI.LowerOperation(DAG.getNode(ISD::UINT_TO_FP, DestTy,
+ Source), DAG);
+ if (NV.getNode())
+ return LegalizeOp(NV);
+ break; // The target decided this was legal after all
+ }
+ }
+
// If this is unsigned, and not supported, first perform the conversion to
// signed, then adjust the result if the sign bit is set.
SDValue SignedConv = ExpandIntToFP(true, DestTy, Source);
projects / oota-llvm.git / blobdiff