STATISTIC(NumFinished, "Number of splits finished");
STATISTIC(NumSimple, "Number of splits that were simple");
+STATISTIC(NumCopies, "Number of copies inserted for splitting");
+STATISTIC(NumRemats, "Number of rematerialized defs for splitting");
+STATISTIC(NumRepairs, "Number of invalid live ranges repaired");
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Split Analysis
UseBlocks.clear();
ThroughBlocks.clear();
CurLI = 0;
+ DidRepairRange = false;
}
SlotIndex SplitAnalysis::computeLastSplitPoint(unsigned Num) {
if (!calcLiveBlockInfo()) {
// FIXME: calcLiveBlockInfo found inconsistencies in the live range.
// I am looking at you, SimpleRegisterCoalescing!
+ DidRepairRange = true;
+ ++NumRepairs;
DEBUG(dbgs() << "*** Fixing inconsistent live interval! ***\n");
const_cast<LiveIntervals&>(LIS)
.shrinkToUses(const_cast<LiveInterval*>(CurLI));
/// where CurLI is live.
bool SplitAnalysis::calcLiveBlockInfo() {
ThroughBlocks.resize(MF.getNumBlockIDs());
- NumThroughBlocks = 0;
+ NumThroughBlocks = NumGapBlocks = 0;
if (CurLI->empty())
return true;
SlotIndex Start, Stop;
tie(Start, Stop) = LIS.getSlotIndexes()->getMBBRange(BI.MBB);
- // LVI is the first live segment overlapping MBB.
- BI.LiveIn = LVI->start <= Start;
- if (!BI.LiveIn)
- BI.Def = LVI->start;
-
- // Find the first and last uses in the block.
- bool Uses = UseI != UseE && *UseI < Stop;
- if (Uses) {
+ // If the block contains no uses, the range must be live through. At one
+ // point, SimpleRegisterCoalescing could create dangling ranges that ended
+ // mid-block.
+ if (UseI == UseE || *UseI >= Stop) {
+ ++NumThroughBlocks;
+ ThroughBlocks.set(BI.MBB->getNumber());
+ // The range shouldn't end mid-block if there are no uses. This shouldn't
+ // happen.
+ if (LVI->end < Stop)
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ // This block has uses. Find the first and last uses in the block.
BI.FirstUse = *UseI;
assert(BI.FirstUse >= Start);
do ++UseI;
while (UseI != UseE && *UseI < Stop);
BI.LastUse = UseI[-1];
assert(BI.LastUse < Stop);
- }
- // Look for gaps in the live range.
- bool hasGap = false;
- BI.LiveOut = true;
- while (LVI->end < Stop) {
- SlotIndex LastStop = LVI->end;
- if (++LVI == LVE || LVI->start >= Stop) {
- BI.Kill = LastStop;
- BI.LiveOut = false;
- break;
- }
- if (LastStop < LVI->start) {
- hasGap = true;
- BI.Kill = LastStop;
- BI.Def = LVI->start;
+ // LVI is the first live segment overlapping MBB.
+ BI.LiveIn = LVI->start <= Start;
+
+ // Look for gaps in the live range.
+ BI.LiveOut = true;
+ while (LVI->end < Stop) {
+ SlotIndex LastStop = LVI->end;
+ if (++LVI == LVE || LVI->start >= Stop) {
+ BI.LiveOut = false;
+ BI.LastUse = LastStop;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (LastStop < LVI->start) {
+ // There is a gap in the live range. Create duplicate entries for the
+ // live-in snippet and the live-out snippet.
+ ++NumGapBlocks;
+
+ // Push the Live-in part.
+ BI.LiveThrough = false;
+ BI.LiveOut = false;
+ UseBlocks.push_back(BI);
+ UseBlocks.back().LastUse = LastStop;
+
+ // Set up BI for the live-out part.
+ BI.LiveIn = false;
+ BI.LiveOut = true;
+ BI.FirstUse = LVI->start;
+ }
}
- }
- // Don't set LiveThrough when the block has a gap.
- BI.LiveThrough = !hasGap && BI.LiveIn && BI.LiveOut;
- if (Uses)
+ // Don't set LiveThrough when the block has a gap.
+ BI.LiveThrough = BI.LiveIn && BI.LiveOut;
UseBlocks.push_back(BI);
- else {
- ++NumThroughBlocks;
- ThroughBlocks.set(BI.MBB->getNumber());
- }
- // FIXME: This should never happen. The live range stops or starts without a
- // corresponding use. An earlier pass did something wrong.
- if (!BI.LiveThrough && !Uses)
- return false;
- // LVI is now at LVE or LVI->end >= Stop.
- if (LVI == LVE)
- break;
+ // LVI is now at LVE or LVI->end >= Stop.
+ if (LVI == LVE)
+ break;
+ }
// Live segment ends exactly at Stop. Move to the next segment.
if (LVI->end == Stop && ++LVI == LVE)
else
MFI = LIS.getMBBFromIndex(LVI->start);
}
+
+ assert(getNumLiveBlocks() == countLiveBlocks(CurLI) && "Bad block count");
return true;
}
+unsigned SplitAnalysis::countLiveBlocks(const LiveInterval *cli) const {
+ if (cli->empty())
+ return 0;
+ LiveInterval *li = const_cast<LiveInterval*>(cli);
+ LiveInterval::iterator LVI = li->begin();
+ LiveInterval::iterator LVE = li->end();
+ unsigned Count = 0;
+
+ // Loop over basic blocks where li is live.
+ MachineFunction::const_iterator MFI = LIS.getMBBFromIndex(LVI->start);
+ SlotIndex Stop = LIS.getMBBEndIdx(MFI);
+ for (;;) {
+ ++Count;
+ LVI = li->advanceTo(LVI, Stop);
+ if (LVI == LVE)
+ return Count;
+ do {
+ ++MFI;
+ Stop = LIS.getMBBEndIdx(MFI);
+ } while (Stop <= LVI->start);
+ }
+}
+
bool SplitAnalysis::isOriginalEndpoint(SlotIndex Idx) const {
unsigned OrigReg = VRM.getOriginal(CurLI->reg);
const LiveInterval &Orig = LIS.getInterval(OrigReg);
// Now for the fun part. We know that ParentVNI potentially has multiple defs,
// and we may need to create even more phi-defs to preserve VNInfo SSA form.
// Perform a search for all predecessor blocks where we know the dominating
- // VNInfo. Insert phi-def VNInfos along the path back to IdxMBB.
+ // VNInfo.
+ VNInfo *VNI = findReachingDefs(LI, IdxMBB, Idx.getNextSlot());
+
+ // When there were multiple different values, we may need new PHIs.
+ if (!VNI)
+ return updateSSA();
+
+ // Poor man's SSA update for the single-value case.
+ LiveOutPair LOP(VNI, MDT[LIS.getMBBFromIndex(VNI->def)]);
+ for (SmallVectorImpl<LiveInBlock>::iterator I = LiveInBlocks.begin(),
+ E = LiveInBlocks.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ MachineBasicBlock *MBB = I->DomNode->getBlock();
+ SlotIndex Start = LIS.getMBBStartIdx(MBB);
+ if (I->Kill.isValid())
+ LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, I->Kill, VNI));
+ else {
+ LiveOutCache[MBB] = LOP;
+ LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, LIS.getMBBEndIdx(MBB), VNI));
+ }
+ }
+}
+/// findReachingDefs - Search the CFG for known live-out values.
+/// Add required live-in blocks to LiveInBlocks.
+VNInfo *SplitEditor::findReachingDefs(LiveInterval *LI,
+ MachineBasicBlock *KillMBB,
+ SlotIndex Kill) {
// Initialize the live-out cache the first time it is needed.
if (LiveOutSeen.empty()) {
unsigned N = VRM.getMachineFunction().getNumBlockIDs();
}
// Blocks where LI should be live-in.
- SmallVector<MachineDomTreeNode*, 16> LiveIn;
- LiveIn.push_back(MDT[IdxMBB]);
+ SmallVector<MachineBasicBlock*, 16> WorkList(1, KillMBB);
// Remember if we have seen more than one value.
bool UniqueVNI = true;
- VNInfo *IdxVNI = 0;
+ VNInfo *TheVNI = 0;
// Using LiveOutCache as a visited set, perform a BFS for all reaching defs.
- for (unsigned i = 0; i != LiveIn.size(); ++i) {
- MachineBasicBlock *MBB = LiveIn[i]->getBlock();
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i != WorkList.size(); ++i) {
+ MachineBasicBlock *MBB = WorkList[i];
assert(!MBB->pred_empty() && "Value live-in to entry block?");
for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
PE = MBB->pred_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
// Is this a known live-out block?
if (LiveOutSeen.test(Pred->getNumber())) {
if (VNInfo *VNI = LOP.first) {
- if (IdxVNI && IdxVNI != VNI)
+ if (TheVNI && TheVNI != VNI)
UniqueVNI = false;
- IdxVNI = VNI;
+ TheVNI = VNI;
}
continue;
}
LOP.first = VNI;
if (VNI) {
LOP.second = MDT[LIS.getMBBFromIndex(VNI->def)];
- if (IdxVNI && IdxVNI != VNI)
+ if (TheVNI && TheVNI != VNI)
UniqueVNI = false;
- IdxVNI = VNI;
+ TheVNI = VNI;
continue;
}
LOP.second = 0;
// No, we need a live-in value for Pred as well
- if (Pred != IdxMBB)
- LiveIn.push_back(MDT[Pred]);
+ if (Pred != KillMBB)
+ WorkList.push_back(Pred);
else
- UniqueVNI = false; // Loopback to IdxMBB, ask updateSSA() for help.
+ // Loopback to KillMBB, so value is really live through.
+ Kill = SlotIndex();
}
}
- // We may need to add phi-def values to preserve the SSA form.
- if (UniqueVNI) {
- LiveOutPair LOP(IdxVNI, MDT[LIS.getMBBFromIndex(IdxVNI->def)]);
- // Update LiveOutCache, but skip IdxMBB at LiveIn[0].
- for (unsigned i = 1, e = LiveIn.size(); i != e; ++i)
- LiveOutCache[LiveIn[i]->getBlock()] = LOP;
- } else
- IdxVNI = updateSSA(RegIdx, LiveIn, Idx, IdxMBB);
-
- // Since we went through the trouble of a full BFS visiting all reaching defs,
- // the values in LiveIn are now accurate. No more phi-defs are needed
- // for these blocks, so we can color the live ranges.
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = LiveIn.size(); i != e; ++i) {
- MachineBasicBlock *MBB = LiveIn[i]->getBlock();
- SlotIndex Start = LIS.getMBBStartIdx(MBB);
- VNInfo *VNI = LiveOutCache[MBB].first;
+ // Transfer WorkList to LiveInBlocks in reverse order.
+ // This ordering works best with updateSSA().
+ LiveInBlocks.clear();
+ LiveInBlocks.reserve(WorkList.size());
+ while(!WorkList.empty())
+ LiveInBlocks.push_back(MDT[WorkList.pop_back_val()]);
- // Anything in LiveIn other than IdxMBB is live-through.
- // In IdxMBB, we should stop at Idx unless the same value is live-out.
- if (MBB == IdxMBB && IdxVNI != VNI)
- LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, Idx.getNextSlot(), IdxVNI));
- else
- LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, LIS.getMBBEndIdx(MBB), VNI));
- }
+ // The kill block may not be live-through.
+ assert(LiveInBlocks.back().DomNode->getBlock() == KillMBB);
+ LiveInBlocks.back().Kill = Kill;
+
+ return UniqueVNI ? TheVNI : 0;
}
-VNInfo *SplitEditor::updateSSA(unsigned RegIdx,
- SmallVectorImpl<MachineDomTreeNode*> &LiveIn,
- SlotIndex Idx,
- const MachineBasicBlock *IdxMBB) {
+void SplitEditor::updateSSA() {
// This is essentially the same iterative algorithm that SSAUpdater uses,
// except we already have a dominator tree, so we don't have to recompute it.
- LiveInterval *LI = Edit->get(RegIdx);
- VNInfo *IdxVNI = 0;
unsigned Changes;
do {
Changes = 0;
// Propagate live-out values down the dominator tree, inserting phi-defs
- // when necessary. Since LiveIn was created by a BFS, going backwards makes
- // it more likely for us to visit immediate dominators before their
- // children.
- for (unsigned i = LiveIn.size(); i; --i) {
- MachineDomTreeNode *Node = LiveIn[i-1];
+ // when necessary.
+ for (SmallVectorImpl<LiveInBlock>::iterator I = LiveInBlocks.begin(),
+ E = LiveInBlocks.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ MachineDomTreeNode *Node = I->DomNode;
+ // Skip block if the live-in value has already been determined.
+ if (!Node)
+ continue;
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = Node->getBlock();
MachineDomTreeNode *IDom = Node->getIDom();
LiveOutPair IDomValue;
// This is probably an unreachable block that has survived somehow.
bool needPHI = !IDom || !LiveOutSeen.test(IDom->getBlock()->getNumber());
- // IDom dominates all of our predecessors, but it may not be the immediate
- // dominator. Check if any of them have live-out values that are properly
- // dominated by IDom. If so, we need a phi-def here.
+ // IDom dominates all of our predecessors, but it may not be their
+ // immediate dominator. Check if any of them have live-out values that are
+ // properly dominated by IDom. If so, we need a phi-def here.
if (!needPHI) {
IDomValue = LiveOutCache[IDom->getBlock()];
for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
}
}
+ // The value may be live-through even if Kill is set, as can happen when
+ // we are called from extendRange. In that case LiveOutSeen is true, and
+ // LiveOutCache indicates a foreign or missing value.
+ LiveOutPair &LOP = LiveOutCache[MBB];
+
// Create a phi-def if required.
if (needPHI) {
++Changes;
SlotIndex Start = LIS.getMBBStartIdx(MBB);
+ unsigned RegIdx = RegAssign.lookup(Start);
+ LiveInterval *LI = Edit->get(RegIdx);
VNInfo *VNI = LI->getNextValue(Start, 0, LIS.getVNInfoAllocator());
VNI->setIsPHIDef(true);
- // We no longer need LI to be live-in.
- LiveIn.erase(LiveIn.begin()+(i-1));
- // Blocks in LiveIn are either IdxMBB, or have a value live-through.
- if (MBB == IdxMBB)
- IdxVNI = VNI;
- // Check if we need to update live-out info.
- LiveOutPair &LOP = LiveOutCache[MBB];
- if (LOP.second == Node || !LiveOutSeen.test(MBB->getNumber())) {
- // We already have a live-out defined in MBB, so this must be IdxMBB.
- assert(MBB == IdxMBB && "Adding phi-def to known live-out");
- LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, Idx.getNextSlot(), VNI));
- } else {
- // This phi-def is also live-out, so color the whole block.
+ I->Value = VNI;
+ // This block is done, we know the final value.
+ I->DomNode = 0;
+ if (I->Kill.isValid())
+ LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, I->Kill, VNI));
+ else {
LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, LIS.getMBBEndIdx(MBB), VNI));
LOP = LiveOutPair(VNI, Node);
}
} else if (IDomValue.first) {
- // No phi-def here. Remember incoming value for IdxMBB.
- if (MBB == IdxMBB) {
- IdxVNI = IDomValue.first;
- // IdxMBB need not be live-out.
- if (!LiveOutSeen.test(MBB->getNumber()))
- continue;
- }
- assert(LiveOutSeen.test(MBB->getNumber()) && "Expected live-out block");
+ // No phi-def here. Remember incoming value.
+ I->Value = IDomValue.first;
+ if (I->Kill.isValid())
+ continue;
// Propagate IDomValue if needed:
// MBB is live-out and doesn't define its own value.
- LiveOutPair &LOP = LiveOutCache[MBB];
if (LOP.second != Node && LOP.first != IDomValue.first) {
++Changes;
LOP = IDomValue;
}
} while (Changes);
- assert(IdxVNI && "Didn't find value for Idx");
- return IdxVNI;
+ // The values in LiveInBlocks are now accurate. No more phi-defs are needed
+ // for these blocks, so we can color the live ranges.
+ for (SmallVectorImpl<LiveInBlock>::iterator I = LiveInBlocks.begin(),
+ E = LiveInBlocks.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ if (!I->DomNode)
+ continue;
+ assert(I->Value && "No live-in value found");
+ MachineBasicBlock *MBB = I->DomNode->getBlock();
+ SlotIndex Start = LIS.getMBBStartIdx(MBB);
+ unsigned RegIdx = RegAssign.lookup(Start);
+ LiveInterval *LI = Edit->get(RegIdx);
+ LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, I->Kill.isValid() ?
+ I->Kill : LIS.getMBBEndIdx(MBB), I->Value));
+ }
}
VNInfo *SplitEditor::defFromParent(unsigned RegIdx,
SlotIndex Def;
LiveInterval *LI = Edit->get(RegIdx);
+ // We may be trying to avoid interference that ends at a deleted instruction,
+ // so always begin RegIdx 0 early and all others late.
+ bool Late = RegIdx != 0;
+
// Attempt cheap-as-a-copy rematerialization.
LiveRangeEdit::Remat RM(ParentVNI);
if (Edit->canRematerializeAt(RM, UseIdx, true, LIS)) {
- Def = Edit->rematerializeAt(MBB, I, LI->reg, RM, LIS, TII, TRI);
+ Def = Edit->rematerializeAt(MBB, I, LI->reg, RM, LIS, TII, TRI, Late);
+ ++NumRemats;
} else {
// Can't remat, just insert a copy from parent.
CopyMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, DebugLoc(), TII.get(TargetOpcode::COPY), LI->reg)
.addReg(Edit->getReg());
- Def = LIS.InsertMachineInstrInMaps(CopyMI).getDefIndex();
+ Def = LIS.getSlotIndexes()->insertMachineInstrInMaps(CopyMI, Late)
+ .getDefIndex();
+ ++NumCopies;
}
// Define the value in Reg.
DEBUG(dump());
}
-/// transferSimpleValues - Transfer all simply defined values to the new live
-/// ranges.
-/// Values that were rematerialized or that have multiple defs are left alone.
-bool SplitEditor::transferSimpleValues() {
+/// transferValues - Transfer all possible values to the new live ranges.
+/// Values that were rematerialized are left alone, they need extendRange().
+bool SplitEditor::transferValues() {
bool Skipped = false;
+ LiveInBlocks.clear();
RegAssignMap::const_iterator AssignI = RegAssign.begin();
for (LiveInterval::const_iterator ParentI = Edit->getParent().begin(),
ParentE = Edit->getParent().end(); ParentI != ParentE; ++ParentI) {
RegIdx = 0;
End = std::min(End, AssignI.start());
}
+
+ // The interval [Start;End) is continuously mapped to RegIdx, ParentVNI.
DEBUG(dbgs() << " [" << Start << ';' << End << ")=" << RegIdx);
+ LiveInterval *LI = Edit->get(RegIdx);
+
+ // Check for a simply defined value that can be blitted directly.
if (VNInfo *VNI = Values.lookup(std::make_pair(RegIdx, ParentVNI->id))) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << ':' << VNI->id);
- Edit->get(RegIdx)->addRange(LiveRange(Start, End, VNI));
- } else
+ LI->addRange(LiveRange(Start, End, VNI));
+ Start = End;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ // Skip rematerialized values, we need to use extendRange() and
+ // extendPHIKillRanges() to completely recompute the live ranges.
+ if (Edit->didRematerialize(ParentVNI)) {
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "(remat)");
Skipped = true;
+ Start = End;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ // Initialize the live-out cache the first time it is needed.
+ if (LiveOutSeen.empty()) {
+ unsigned N = VRM.getMachineFunction().getNumBlockIDs();
+ LiveOutSeen.resize(N);
+ LiveOutCache.resize(N);
+ }
+
+ // This value has multiple defs in RegIdx, but it wasn't rematerialized,
+ // so the live range is accurate. Add live-in blocks in [Start;End) to the
+ // LiveInBlocks.
+ MachineFunction::iterator MBB = LIS.getMBBFromIndex(Start);
+ SlotIndex BlockStart, BlockEnd;
+ tie(BlockStart, BlockEnd) = LIS.getSlotIndexes()->getMBBRange(MBB);
+
+ // The first block may be live-in, or it may have its own def.
+ if (Start != BlockStart) {
+ VNInfo *VNI = LI->extendInBlock(BlockStart,
+ std::min(BlockEnd, End).getPrevSlot());
+ assert(VNI && "Missing def for complex mapped value");
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << ':' << VNI->id << "*BB#" << MBB->getNumber());
+ // MBB has its own def. Is it also live-out?
+ if (BlockEnd <= End) {
+ LiveOutSeen.set(MBB->getNumber());
+ LiveOutCache[MBB] = LiveOutPair(VNI, MDT[MBB]);
+ }
+ // Skip to the next block for live-in.
+ ++MBB;
+ BlockStart = BlockEnd;
+ }
+
+ // Handle the live-in blocks covered by [Start;End).
+ assert(Start <= BlockStart && "Expected live-in block");
+ while (BlockStart < End) {
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << ">BB#" << MBB->getNumber());
+ BlockEnd = LIS.getMBBEndIdx(MBB);
+ if (BlockStart == ParentVNI->def) {
+ // This block has the def of a parent PHI, so it isn't live-in.
+ assert(ParentVNI->isPHIDef() && "Non-phi defined at block start?");
+ VNInfo *VNI = LI->extendInBlock(BlockStart,
+ std::min(BlockEnd, End).getPrevSlot());
+ assert(VNI && "Missing def for complex mapped parent PHI");
+ if (End >= BlockEnd) {
+ // Live-out as well.
+ LiveOutSeen.set(MBB->getNumber());
+ LiveOutCache[MBB] = LiveOutPair(VNI, MDT[MBB]);
+ }
+ } else {
+ // This block needs a live-in value.
+ LiveInBlocks.push_back(MDT[MBB]);
+ // The last block covered may not be live-out.
+ if (End < BlockEnd)
+ LiveInBlocks.back().Kill = End;
+ else {
+ // Live-out, but we need updateSSA to tell us the value.
+ LiveOutSeen.set(MBB->getNumber());
+ LiveOutCache[MBB] = LiveOutPair((VNInfo*)0,
+ (MachineDomTreeNode*)0);
+ }
+ }
+ BlockStart = BlockEnd;
+ ++MBB;
+ }
Start = End;
} while (Start != ParentI->end);
DEBUG(dbgs() << '\n');
}
+
+ if (!LiveInBlocks.empty())
+ updateSSA();
+
return Skipped;
}
Edit->eliminateDeadDefs(Dead, LIS, VRM, TII);
}
-void SplitEditor::finish() {
+void SplitEditor::finish(SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> *LRMap) {
++NumFinished;
// At this point, the live intervals in Edit contain VNInfos corresponding to
assert((*I)->hasAtLeastOneValue() && "Split interval has no value");
#endif
- // Transfer the simply mapped values, check if any are complex.
- bool Complex = transferSimpleValues();
- if (Complex)
+ // Transfer the simply mapped values, check if any are skipped.
+ bool Skipped = transferValues();
+ if (Skipped)
extendPHIKillRanges();
else
++NumSimple;
// Rewrite virtual registers, possibly extending ranges.
- rewriteAssigned(Complex);
+ rewriteAssigned(Skipped);
// Delete defs that were rematted everywhere.
- if (Complex)
+ if (Skipped)
deleteRematVictims();
// Get rid of unused values and set phi-kill flags.
for (LiveRangeEdit::iterator I = Edit->begin(), E = Edit->end(); I != E; ++I)
(*I)->RenumberValues(LIS);
+ // Provide a reverse mapping from original indices to Edit ranges.
+ if (LRMap) {
+ LRMap->clear();
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = Edit->size(); i != e; ++i)
+ LRMap->push_back(i);
+ }
+
// Now check if any registers were separated into multiple components.
ConnectedVNInfoEqClasses ConEQ(LIS);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Edit->size(); i != e; ++i) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << " " << NumComp << " components: " << *li << '\n');
SmallVector<LiveInterval*, 8> dups;
dups.push_back(li);
- for (unsigned i = 1; i != NumComp; ++i)
+ for (unsigned j = 1; j != NumComp; ++j)
dups.push_back(&Edit->create(LIS, VRM));
ConEQ.Distribute(&dups[0], MRI);
+ // The new intervals all map back to i.
+ if (LRMap)
+ LRMap->resize(Edit->size(), i);
}
// Calculate spill weight and allocation hints for new intervals.
Edit->calculateRegClassAndHint(VRM.getMachineFunction(), LIS, SA.Loops);
+
+ assert(!LRMap || LRMap->size() == Edit->size());
}