Opc = ARM::VMOVRS;
else if (SPRDest && GPRSrc)
Opc = ARM::VMOVSR;
- else if (ARM::DPRRegClass.contains(DestReg, SrcReg))
+ else if (ARM::DPRRegClass.contains(DestReg, SrcReg) && !Subtarget.isFPOnlySP())
Opc = ARM::VMOVD;
else if (ARM::QPRRegClass.contains(DestReg, SrcReg))
Opc = ARM::VORRq;
BeginIdx = ARM::dsub_0;
SubRegs = 4;
Spacing = 2;
+ } else if (ARM::DPRRegClass.contains(DestReg, SrcReg) && Subtarget.isFPOnlySP()) {
+ Opc = ARM::VMOVS;
+ BeginIdx = ARM::ssub_0;
+ SubRegs = 2;
}
assert(Opc && "Impossible reg-to-reg copy");
// copyPhysReg() calls. Look for VMOVS instructions that can legally be
// widened to VMOVD. We prefer the VMOVD when possible because it may be
// changed into a VORR that can go down the NEON pipeline.
- if (!WidenVMOVS || !MI->isCopy() || Subtarget.isCortexA15())
+ if (!WidenVMOVS || !MI->isCopy() || Subtarget.isCortexA15() ||
+ Subtarget.isFPOnlySP())
return false;
// Look for a copy between even S-registers. That is where we keep floats
// FIXME: The current MachineInstr design does not support relying on machine
// mem operands to determine the width of a memory access. Instead, we expect
// the target to provide this information based on the instruction opcode and
-// operands. However, using MachineMemOperand is a the best solution now for
+// operands. However, using MachineMemOperand is the best solution now for
// two reasons:
//
// 1) getNumMicroOps tries to infer LDM memory width from the total number of MI
return false;
}
+
+bool ARMBaseInstrInfo::getRegSequenceLikeInputs(
+ const MachineInstr &MI, unsigned DefIdx,
+ SmallVectorImpl<RegSubRegPairAndIdx> &InputRegs) const {
+ assert(DefIdx < MI.getDesc().getNumDefs() && "Invalid definition index");
+ assert(MI.isRegSequenceLike() && "Invalid kind of instruction");
+
+ switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
+ case ARM::VMOVDRR:
+ // dX = VMOVDRR rY, rZ
+ // is the same as:
+ // dX = REG_SEQUENCE rY, ssub_0, rZ, ssub_1
+ // Populate the InputRegs accordingly.
+ // rY
+ const MachineOperand *MOReg = &MI.getOperand(1);
+ InputRegs.push_back(
+ RegSubRegPairAndIdx(MOReg->getReg(), MOReg->getSubReg(), ARM::ssub_0));
+ // rZ
+ MOReg = &MI.getOperand(2);
+ InputRegs.push_back(
+ RegSubRegPairAndIdx(MOReg->getReg(), MOReg->getSubReg(), ARM::ssub_1));
+ return true;
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("Target dependent opcode missing");
+}
+
+bool ARMBaseInstrInfo::getExtractSubregLikeInputs(
+ const MachineInstr &MI, unsigned DefIdx,
+ RegSubRegPairAndIdx &InputReg) const {
+ assert(DefIdx < MI.getDesc().getNumDefs() && "Invalid definition index");
+ assert(MI.isExtractSubregLike() && "Invalid kind of instruction");
+
+ switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
+ case ARM::VMOVRRD:
+ // rX, rY = VMOVRRD dZ
+ // is the same as:
+ // rX = EXTRACT_SUBREG dZ, ssub_0
+ // rY = EXTRACT_SUBREG dZ, ssub_1
+ const MachineOperand &MOReg = MI.getOperand(2);
+ InputReg.Reg = MOReg.getReg();
+ InputReg.SubReg = MOReg.getSubReg();
+ InputReg.SubIdx = DefIdx == 0 ? ARM::ssub_0 : ARM::ssub_1;
+ return true;
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("Target dependent opcode missing");
+}
+
+bool ARMBaseInstrInfo::getInsertSubregLikeInputs(
+ const MachineInstr &MI, unsigned DefIdx, RegSubRegPair &BaseReg,
+ RegSubRegPairAndIdx &InsertedReg) const {
+ assert(DefIdx < MI.getDesc().getNumDefs() && "Invalid definition index");
+ assert(MI.isInsertSubregLike() && "Invalid kind of instruction");
+
+ switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
+ case ARM::VSETLNi32:
+ // dX = VSETLNi32 dY, rZ, imm
+ const MachineOperand &MOBaseReg = MI.getOperand(1);
+ const MachineOperand &MOInsertedReg = MI.getOperand(2);
+ const MachineOperand &MOIndex = MI.getOperand(3);
+ BaseReg.Reg = MOBaseReg.getReg();
+ BaseReg.SubReg = MOBaseReg.getSubReg();
+
+ InsertedReg.Reg = MOInsertedReg.getReg();
+ InsertedReg.SubReg = MOInsertedReg.getSubReg();
+ InsertedReg.SubIdx = MOIndex.getImm() == 0 ? ARM::ssub_0 : ARM::ssub_1;
+ return true;
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("Target dependent opcode missing");
+}