example, two instructions might be equally valid for some given IR and one is
chosen in preference to the other.
+bclri.b:
+ It is not possible to emit bclri.b since andi.b covers exactly the
+ same cases. andi.b should use fractionally less power than bclri.b in
+ most hardware implementations so it is used in preference to bclri.b.
+
vshf.w:
It is not possible to emit vshf.w when the shuffle description is
constant since shf.w covers exactly the same cases. shf.w is used
It is not possible to emit splati.w since shf.w covers the same cases.
shf.w will be emitted instead.
-copy_s.w
+copy_s.w:
On MIPS32, the copy_u.d intrinsic will emit this instruction instead of
copy_u.w. This is semantically equivalent since the general-purpose
register file is 32-bits wide.
+
+binsri.[bhwd], binsli.[bhwd]:
+ These two operations are equivalent to each other with the operands
+ swapped and condition inverted. The compiler may use either one as
+ appropriate.
+ Furthermore, the compiler may use bsel.[bhwd] for some masks that do
+ not survive the legalization process (this is a bug and will be fixed).
+
+bmnz.v, bmz.v, bsel.v:
+ These three operations differ only in the operand that is tied to the
+ result.
+ It is (currently) not possible to emit bmz.v, or bsel.v since bmnz.v is
+ the same operation and will be emitted instead.
+ In future, the compiler may choose between these three instructions
+ according to register allocation.
+
+bmnzi.b, bmzi.b:
+ Like their non-immediate counterparts, bmnzi.v and bmzi.v are the same
+ operation with the operands swapped. bmnzi.v will (currently) be emitted
+ for both cases.
+
+bseli.v:
+ Unlike the non-immediate versions, bseli.v is distinguishable from
+ bmnzi.b and bmzi.b and can be emitted.