Target Independent Opportunities:
-===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+We should make the following changes to clean up MachineInstr:
+
+1. Add an Opcode field to TargetInstrDescriptor, so you can tell the opcode of
+ an instruction with just a TargetInstrDescriptor*.
+2. Remove the Opcode field from MachineInstr, replacing it with a
+ TargetInstrDescriptor*.
+3. Getting information about a machine instr then becomes:
+ MI->getInfo()->isTwoAddress()
+ instead of:
+ const TargetInstrInfo &TII = ...
+ TII.isTwoAddrInstr(MI->getOpcode())
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+With the recent changes to make the implicit def/use set explicit in
+machineinstrs, we should change the target descriptions for 'call' instructions
+so that the .td files don't list all the call-clobbered registers as implicit
+defs. Instead, these should be added by the code generator (e.g. on the dag).
+
+This has a number of uses:
+
+1. PPC32/64 and X86 32/64 can avoid having multiple copies of call instructions
+ for their different impdef sets.
+2. Targets with multiple calling convs (e.g. x86) which have different clobber
+ sets don't need copies of call instructions.
+3. 'Interprocedural register allocation' can be done to reduce the clobber sets
+ of calls.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
FreeBench/mason contains code like this:
a bunch of loads from m. It would be better to avoid the memcpy and just do
loads from the static array.
-===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+Make the PPC branch selector target independant
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Get the C front-end to expand hypot(x,y) -> llvm.sqrt(x*x+y*y) when errno and
precision don't matter (ffastmath). Misc/mandel will like this. :)
Number 1 is the preferred solution.
+This has been "fixed" by a TableGen hack. But that is a short term workaround
+which will be removed once the proper fix is made.
+
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-DAG combine this into mul A, 8:
+On targets with expensive 64-bit multiply, we could LSR this:
+
+for (i = ...; ++i) {
+ x = 1ULL << i;
+
+into:
+ long long tmp = 1;
+ for (i = ...; ++i, tmp+=tmp)
+ x = tmp;
+
+This would be a win on ppc32, but not x86 or ppc64.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+Shrink: (setlt (loadi32 P), 0) -> (setlt (loadi8 Phi), 0)
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+Reassociate should turn: X*X*X*X -> t=(X*X) (t*t) to eliminate a multiply.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-int %test(int %A) {
- %B = mul int %A, 8 ;; shift
- %C = add int %B, 7 ;; dead, no demanded bits.
- %D = and int %C, -8 ;; dead once add is gone.
- ret int %D
+Interesting? testcase for add/shift/mul reassoc:
+
+int bar(int x, int y) {
+ return x*x*x+y+x*x*x*x*x*y*y*y*y;
+}
+int foo(int z, int n) {
+ return bar(z, n) + bar(2*z, 2*n);
}
-This sort of thing occurs in the alloca lowering code and other places that
-are generating alignment of an already aligned value.
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+These two functions should generate the same code on big-endian systems:
+
+int g(int *j,int *l) { return memcmp(j,l,4); }
+int h(int *j, int *l) { return *j - *l; }
+
+this could be done in SelectionDAGISel.cpp, along with other special cases,
+for 1,2,4,8 bytes.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+This code:
+int rot(unsigned char b) { int a = ((b>>1) ^ (b<<7)) & 0xff; return a; }
+
+Can be improved in two ways:
+
+1. The instcombiner should eliminate the type conversions.
+2. The X86 backend should turn this into a rotate by one bit.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+Add LSR exit value substitution. It'll probably be a win for Ackermann, etc.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+It would be nice to revert this patch:
+http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20060213/031986.html
+
+And teach the dag combiner enough to simplify the code expanded before
+legalize. It seems plausible that this knowledge would let it simplify other
+stuff too.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+For packed types, TargetData.cpp::getTypeInfo() returns alignment that is equal
+to the type size. It works but can be overly conservative as the alignment of
+specific packed types are target dependent.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-Turn this into a signed shift right in instcombine:
+We should add 'unaligned load/store' nodes, and produce them from code like
+this:
-int f(unsigned x) {
- return x >> 31 ? -1 : 0;
+v4sf example(float *P) {
+ return (v4sf){P[0], P[1], P[2], P[3] };
}
-http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25600
-http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01492.html
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+We should constant fold packed type casts at the LLVM level, regardless of the
+cast. Currently we cannot fold some casts because we don't have TargetData
+information in the constant folder, so we don't know the endianness of the
+target!
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-We should reassociate:
-int f(int a, int b){ return a * a + 2 * a * b + b * b; }
-into:
-int f(int a, int b) { return a * (a + 2 * b) + b * b; }
-to eliminate a multiply.
+Add support for conditional increments, and other related patterns. Instead
+of:
+
+ movl 136(%esp), %eax
+ cmpl $0, %eax
+ je LBB16_2 #cond_next
+LBB16_1: #cond_true
+ incl _foo
+LBB16_2: #cond_next
+
+emit:
+ movl _foo, %eax
+ cmpl $1, %edi
+ sbbl $-1, %eax
+ movl %eax, _foo
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-On targets with expensive 64-bit multiply, we could LSR this:
+Combine: a = sin(x), b = cos(x) into a,b = sincos(x).
-for (i = ...; ++i) {
- x = 1ULL << i;
+Expand these to calls of sin/cos and stores:
+ double sincos(double x, double *sin, double *cos);
+ float sincosf(float x, float *sin, float *cos);
+ long double sincosl(long double x, long double *sin, long double *cos);
-into:
- long long tmp = 1;
- for (i = ...; ++i, tmp+=tmp)
- x = tmp;
+Doing so could allow SROA of the destination pointers. See also:
+http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17687
-This would be a win on ppc32, but not x86 or ppc64.
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+Scalar Repl cannot currently promote this testcase to 'ret long cst':
+
+ %struct.X = type { int, int }
+ %struct.Y = type { %struct.X }
+ulong %bar() {
+ %retval = alloca %struct.Y, align 8 ; <%struct.Y*> [#uses=3]
+ %tmp12 = getelementptr %struct.Y* %retval, int 0, uint 0, uint 0
+ store int 0, int* %tmp12
+ %tmp15 = getelementptr %struct.Y* %retval, int 0, uint 0, uint 1
+ store int 1, int* %tmp15
+ %retval = cast %struct.Y* %retval to ulong*
+ %retval = load ulong* %retval ; <ulong> [#uses=1]
+ ret ulong %retval
+}
+
+it should be extended to do so.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-Shrink: (setlt (loadi32 P), 0) -> (setlt (loadi8 Phi), 0)
+Turn this into a single byte store with no load (the other 3 bytes are
+unmodified):
+
+void %test(uint* %P) {
+ %tmp = load uint* %P
+ %tmp14 = or uint %tmp, 3305111552
+ %tmp15 = and uint %tmp14, 3321888767
+ store uint %tmp15, uint* %P
+ ret void
+}
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-Reassociate is missing this:
+dag/inst combine "clz(x)>>5 -> x==0" for 32-bit x.
+
+Compile:
-int test(int X, int Y) {
- return (X+X+Y+Y); // (X+Y) << 1;
+int bar(int x)
+{
+ int t = __builtin_clz(x);
+ return -(t>>5);
}
-it needs to turn the shifts into multiplies to get it.
+to:
+
+_bar: addic r3,r3,-1
+ subfe r3,r3,r3
+ blr
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-These two functions should generate the same code on big-endian systems:
+Legalize should lower ctlz like this:
+ ctlz(x) = popcnt((x-1) & ~x)
-int g(int *j,int *l) { return memcmp(j,l,4); }
-int h(int *j, int *l) { return *j - *l; }
+on targets that have popcnt but not ctlz. itanium, what else?
-this could be done in SelectionDAGISel.cpp, along with other special cases,
-for 1,2,4,8 bytes.
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+quantum_sigma_x in 462.libquantum contains the following loop:
+
+ for(i=0; i<reg->size; i++)
+ {
+ /* Flip the target bit of each basis state */
+ reg->node[i].state ^= ((MAX_UNSIGNED) 1 << target);
+ }
+
+Where MAX_UNSIGNED/state is a 64-bit int. On a 32-bit platform it would be just
+so cool to turn it into something like:
+
+ long long Res = ((MAX_UNSIGNED) 1 << target);
+ if (target < 32) {
+ for(i=0; i<reg->size; i++)
+ reg->node[i].state ^= Res & 0xFFFFFFFFULL;
+ } else {
+ for(i=0; i<reg->size; i++)
+ reg->node[i].state ^= Res & 0xFFFFFFFF00000000ULL
+ }
+
+... which would only do one 32-bit XOR per loop iteration instead of two.
+
+It would also be nice to recognize the reg->size doesn't alias reg->node[i], but
+alas...
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+This isn't recognized as bswap by instcombine:
+
+unsigned int swap_32(unsigned int v) {
+ v = ((v & 0x00ff00ffU) << 8) | ((v & 0xff00ff00U) >> 8);
+ v = ((v & 0x0000ffffU) << 16) | ((v & 0xffff0000U) >> 16);
+ return v;
+}
+
+Nor is this:
+
+ushort %bad(ushort %a) {
+entry:
+ %tmp = cast ushort %a to uint ; <uint> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp2 = shr uint %tmp, ubyte 8 ; <uint> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp2 = cast uint %tmp2 to ushort ; <ushort> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp5 = shl ushort %a, ubyte 8 ; <ushort> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp6 = or ushort %tmp2, %tmp5 ; <ushort> [#uses=1]
+ ret ushort %tmp6
+}
+
+unsigned short bad(unsigned short a) {
+ return ((a & 0xff00) >> 8 | (a & 0x00ff) << 8);
+}
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+These should turn into single 16-bit (unaligned?) loads on little/big endian
+processors.
+
+unsigned short read_16_le(const unsigned char *adr) {
+ return adr[0] | (adr[1] << 8);
+}
+unsigned short read_16_be(const unsigned char *adr) {
+ return (adr[0] << 8) | adr[1];
+}
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+-scalarrepl should promote this to be a vector scalar.
+
+ %struct..0anon = type { <4 x float> }
+implementation ; Functions:
+void %test1(<4 x float> %V, float* %P) {
+entry:
+ %u = alloca %struct..0anon, align 16 ; <%struct..0anon*> [#uses=2]
+ %tmp = getelementptr %struct..0anon* %u, int 0, uint 0 ; <<4 x float>*> [#uses=1]
+ store <4 x float> %V, <4 x float>* %tmp
+ %tmp1 = cast %struct..0anon* %u to [4 x float]* ; <[4 x float]*> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp = getelementptr [4 x float]* %tmp1, int 0, int 1 ; <float*> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp = load float* %tmp ; <float> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp3 = mul float %tmp, 2.000000e+00 ; <float> [#uses=1]
+ store float %tmp3, float* %P
+ ret void
+}
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+-instcombine should handle this transform:
+ setcc (sdiv X / C1 ), C2
+when X, C1, and C2 are unsigned. Similarly for udiv and signed operands.
+
+Currently InstCombine avoids this transform but will do it when the signs of
+the operands and the sign of the divide match. See the FIXME in
+InstructionCombining.cpp in the visitSetCondInst method after the switch case
+for Instruction::UDiv (around line 4447) for more details.
+
+The SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash and hash2 tests have examples of
+this construct.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+Instcombine misses several of these cases (see the testcase in the patch):
+http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg01519.html
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+viterbi speeds up *significantly* if the various "history" related copy loops
+are turned into memcpy calls at the source level. We need a "loops to memcpy"
+pass.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+-predsimplify should transform this:
+
+void bad(unsigned x)
+{
+ if (x > 4)
+ bar(12);
+ else if (x > 3)
+ bar(523);
+ else if (x > 2)
+ bar(36);
+ else if (x > 1)
+ bar(65);
+ else if (x > 0)
+ bar(45);
+ else
+ bar(367);
+}
+
+into:
+
+void good(unsigned x)
+{
+ if (x == 4)
+ bar(523);
+ else if (x == 3)
+ bar(36);
+ else if (x == 2)
+ bar(65);
+ else if (x == 1)
+ bar(45);
+ else if (x == 0)
+ bar(367);
+ else
+ bar(12);
+}
+
+to enable further optimizations.
+
+//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//