-//===- DominatorSet.cpp - Dominator Set Calculation --------------*- C++ -*--=//
+//===- Dominators.cpp - Dominator Calculation -----------------------------===//
//
-// This file provides a simple class to calculate the dominator set of a method.
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file implements simple dominator construction algorithms for finding
+// forward dominators. Postdominators are available in libanalysis, but are not
+// included in libvmcore, because it's not needed. Forward dominators are
+// needed to support the Verifier pass.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
-#include "llvm/Transforms/UnifyMethodExitNodes.h"
-#include "llvm/Method.h"
-#include "Support/DepthFirstIterator.h"
-#include "Support/STLExtras.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/DominatorInternals.h"
+#include "llvm/Assembly/Writer.h"
+#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include <algorithm>
-using std::set;
+using namespace llvm;
+// Always verify dominfo if expensive checking is enabled.
+#ifdef XDEBUG
+static bool VerifyDomInfo = true;
+#else
+static bool VerifyDomInfo = false;
+#endif
+static cl::opt<bool,true>
+VerifyDomInfoX("verify-dom-info", cl::location(VerifyDomInfo),
+ cl::desc("Verify dominator info (time consuming)"));
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// Helper Template
+// DominatorTree Implementation
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-// set_intersect - Identical to set_intersection, except that it works on
-// set<>'s and is nicer to use. Functionally, this iterates through S1,
-// removing elements that are not contained in S2.
//
-template <class Ty, class Ty2>
-void set_intersect(set<Ty> &S1, const set<Ty2> &S2) {
- for (typename set<Ty>::iterator I = S1.begin(); I != S1.end();) {
- const Ty &E = *I;
- ++I;
- if (!S2.count(E)) S1.erase(E); // Erase element if not in S2
- }
-}
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// DominatorSet Implementation
+// Provide public access to DominatorTree information. Implementation details
+// can be found in DominatorInternals.h.
+//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-AnalysisID cfg::DominatorSet::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorSet>());
-AnalysisID cfg::DominatorSet::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorSet>());
+TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION(class llvm::DomTreeNodeBase<BasicBlock>);
+TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION(class llvm::DominatorTreeBase<BasicBlock>);
-bool cfg::DominatorSet::runOnMethod(Method *M) {
- Doms.clear(); // Reset from the last time we were run...
+char DominatorTree::ID = 0;
+INITIALIZE_PASS(DominatorTree, "domtree",
+ "Dominator Tree Construction", true, true)
- if (isPostDominator())
- calcPostDominatorSet(M);
- else
- calcForwardDominatorSet(M);
+bool DominatorTree::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
+ DT->recalculate(F);
return false;
}
+void DominatorTree::verifyAnalysis() const {
+ if (!VerifyDomInfo) return;
-// calcForwardDominatorSet - This method calculates the forward dominator sets
-// for the specified method.
-//
-void cfg::DominatorSet::calcForwardDominatorSet(Method *M) {
- Root = M->getEntryNode();
- assert(Root->pred_begin() == Root->pred_end() &&
- "Root node has predecessors in method!");
-
- bool Changed;
- do {
- Changed = false;
-
- DomSetType WorkingSet;
- df_iterator<Method*> It = df_begin(M), End = df_end(M);
- for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
- const BasicBlock *BB = *It;
- BasicBlock::pred_const_iterator PI = BB->pred_begin(),
- PEnd = BB->pred_end();
- if (PI != PEnd) { // Is there SOME predecessor?
- // Loop until we get to a predecessor that has had it's dom set filled
- // in at least once. We are guaranteed to have this because we are
- // traversing the graph in DFO and have handled start nodes specially.
- //
- while (Doms[*PI].size() == 0) ++PI;
- WorkingSet = Doms[*PI];
-
- for (++PI; PI != PEnd; ++PI) { // Intersect all of the predecessor sets
- DomSetType &PredSet = Doms[*PI];
- if (PredSet.size())
- set_intersect(WorkingSet, PredSet);
- }
- }
-
- WorkingSet.insert(BB); // A block always dominates itself
- DomSetType &BBSet = Doms[BB];
- if (BBSet != WorkingSet) {
- BBSet.swap(WorkingSet); // Constant time operation!
- Changed = true; // The sets changed.
- }
- WorkingSet.clear(); // Clear out the set for next iteration
- }
- } while (Changed);
-}
-
-// Postdominator set constructor. This ctor converts the specified method to
-// only have a single exit node (return stmt), then calculates the post
-// dominance sets for the method.
-//
-void cfg::DominatorSet::calcPostDominatorSet(Method *M) {
- // Since we require that the unify all exit nodes pass has been run, we know
- // that there can be at most one return instruction in the method left.
- // Get it.
- //
- Root = getAnalysis<UnifyMethodExitNodes>().getExitNode();
-
- if (Root == 0) { // No exit node for the method? Postdomsets are all empty
- for (Method::const_iterator MI = M->begin(), ME = M->end(); MI != ME; ++MI)
- Doms[*MI] = DomSetType();
- return;
- }
-
- bool Changed;
- do {
- Changed = false;
-
- set<const BasicBlock*> Visited;
- DomSetType WorkingSet;
- idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> It = idf_begin(Root), End = idf_end(Root);
- for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
- const BasicBlock *BB = *It;
- BasicBlock::succ_const_iterator PI = BB->succ_begin(),
- PEnd = BB->succ_end();
- if (PI != PEnd) { // Is there SOME predecessor?
- // Loop until we get to a successor that has had it's dom set filled
- // in at least once. We are guaranteed to have this because we are
- // traversing the graph in DFO and have handled start nodes specially.
- //
- while (Doms[*PI].size() == 0) ++PI;
- WorkingSet = Doms[*PI];
-
- for (++PI; PI != PEnd; ++PI) { // Intersect all of the successor sets
- DomSetType &PredSet = Doms[*PI];
- if (PredSet.size())
- set_intersect(WorkingSet, PredSet);
- }
- }
-
- WorkingSet.insert(BB); // A block always dominates itself
- DomSetType &BBSet = Doms[BB];
- if (BBSet != WorkingSet) {
- BBSet.swap(WorkingSet); // Constant time operation!
- Changed = true; // The sets changed.
- }
- WorkingSet.clear(); // Clear out the set for next iteration
- }
- } while (Changed);
-}
-
-// getAnalysisUsageInfo - This obviously provides a dominator set, but it also
-// uses the UnifyMethodExitNodes pass if building post-dominators
-//
-void cfg::DominatorSet::getAnalysisUsageInfo(Pass::AnalysisSet &Requires,
- Pass::AnalysisSet &Destroyed,
- Pass::AnalysisSet &Provided) {
- if (isPostDominator()) {
- Provided.push_back(PostDomID);
- Requires.push_back(UnifyMethodExitNodes::ID);
- } else {
- Provided.push_back(ID);
- }
-}
-
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// ImmediateDominators Implementation
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-AnalysisID cfg::ImmediateDominators::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::ImmediateDominators>());
-AnalysisID cfg::ImmediateDominators::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::ImmediateDominators>());
-
-// calcIDoms - Calculate the immediate dominator mapping, given a set of
-// dominators for every basic block.
-void cfg::ImmediateDominators::calcIDoms(const DominatorSet &DS) {
- // Loop over all of the nodes that have dominators... figuring out the IDOM
- // for each node...
- //
- for (DominatorSet::const_iterator DI = DS.begin(), DEnd = DS.end();
- DI != DEnd; ++DI) {
- const BasicBlock *BB = DI->first;
- const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DI->second;
- unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
- if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
+ Function &F = *getRoot()->getParent();
- // Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping over
- // nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator set is
- // equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does not exist
- // in it. This means that it is one level higher in the dom chain than the
- // current node, and it is our idom!
- //
- DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
- DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
- for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
- // All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number of elements
- // in the dominator set indicates what level the node is at in the chain.
- // We want the node immediately above us, so it will have an identical
- // dominator set, except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
- // dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
- //
- if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
- IDoms[BB] = *I;
- break;
- }
- }
+ DominatorTree OtherDT;
+ OtherDT.getBase().recalculate(F);
+ if (compare(OtherDT)) {
+ errs() << "DominatorTree is not up to date!\nComputed:\n";
+ print(errs());
+ errs() << "\nActual:\n";
+ OtherDT.print(errs());
+ abort();
}
}
-
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// DominatorTree Implementation
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
-AnalysisID cfg::DominatorTree::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorTree>());
-AnalysisID cfg::DominatorTree::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorTree>());
-
-// DominatorTree::reset - Free all of the tree node memory.
-//
-void cfg::DominatorTree::reset() {
- for (NodeMapType::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I)
- delete I->second;
- Nodes.clear();
-}
-
-
-#if 0
-// Given immediate dominators, we can also calculate the dominator tree
-cfg::DominatorTree::DominatorTree(const ImmediateDominators &IDoms)
- : DominatorBase(IDoms.getRoot()) {
- const Method *M = Root->getParent();
-
- Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
-
- // Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
- for (df_iterator<const Method*> I = df_begin(M), E = df_end(M); I != E; ++I) {
- const BasicBlock *BB = *I, *IDom = IDoms[*I];
-
- if (IDom != 0) { // Ignore the root node and other nasty nodes
- // We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
- // because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
- //
- assert(Nodes[IDom] && "No node for IDOM?");
- Node *IDomNode = Nodes[IDom];
-
- // Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
- // IDomNode
- Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
- }
- }
+void DominatorTree::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *) const {
+ DT->print(OS);
}
-#endif
-
-void cfg::DominatorTree::calculate(const DominatorSet &DS) {
- Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
- if (!isPostDominator()) {
- // Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
- for (df_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = df_begin(Root), E = df_end(Root);
- I != E; ++I) {
- const BasicBlock *BB = *I;
- const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
- unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
- if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
-
- // Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping over
- // nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator set is
- // equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does not exist
- // in it. This means that it is one level higher in the dom chain than the
- // current node, and it is our idom! We know that we have already added
- // a DominatorTree node for our idom, because the idom must be a
- // predecessor in the depth first order that we are iterating through the
- // method.
- //
- DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
- DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
- for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
- // All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number of
- // elements in the dominator set indicates what level the node is at in
- // the chain. We want the node immediately above us, so it will have
- // an identical dominator set, except that BB will not dominate it...
- // therefore it's dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
- //
- if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
- // We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
- // because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
- //
- Node *IDomNode = Nodes[*I];
- assert(IDomNode && "No node for IDOM?");
-
- // Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
- // IDomNode
- Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- } else if (Root) {
- // Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
- for (idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = idf_begin(Root), E = idf_end(Root);
- I != E; ++I) {
- const BasicBlock *BB = *I;
- const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
- unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
- if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
-
- // Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping
- // over nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator
- // set is equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does
- // not exist in it. This means that it is one level higher in the dom
- // chain than the current node, and it is our idom! We know that we have
- // already added a DominatorTree node for our idom, because the idom must
- // be a predecessor in the depth first order that we are iterating through
- // the method.
- //
- DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
- DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
- for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
- // All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number
- // of elements in the dominator set indicates what level the
- // node is at in the chain. We want the node immediately
- // above us, so it will have an identical dominator set,
- // except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
- // dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
- //
- if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
- // We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
- // because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
- //
- Node *IDomNode = Nodes[*I];
- assert(IDomNode && "No node for IDOM?");
-
- // Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
- // IDomNode
- Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- }
+// dominates - Return true if Def dominates a use in User. This performs
+// the special checks necessary if Def and User are in the same basic block.
+// Note that Def doesn't dominate a use in Def itself!
+bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
+ const Instruction *User) const {
+ const BasicBlock *UseBB = User->getParent();
+ const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent();
+
+ assert(isReachableFromEntry(DefBB) && isReachableFromEntry(UseBB) &&
+ "We only handle reachable blocks");
+
+ // An instruction doesn't dominate a use in itself.
+ if (Def == User)
+ return false;
+
+ // The value defined by an invoke dominates an instruction only if
+ // it dominates every instruction in UseBB.
+ // A PHI is dominated only if the instruction dominates every possible use
+ // in the UseBB.
+ if (isa<InvokeInst>(Def) || isa<PHINode>(User))
+ return dominates(Def, UseBB);
+
+ if (DefBB != UseBB)
+ return dominates(DefBB, UseBB);
+
+ // Loop through the basic block until we find Def or User.
+ BasicBlock::const_iterator I = DefBB->begin();
+ for (; &*I != Def && &*I != User; ++I)
+ /*empty*/;
+
+ return &*I == Def;
}
+// true if Def would dominate a use in any instruction in UseBB.
+// note that dominates(Def, Def->getParent()) is false.
+bool DominatorTree::dominates(const Instruction *Def,
+ const BasicBlock *UseBB) const {
+ const BasicBlock *DefBB = Def->getParent();
+ assert(isReachableFromEntry(DefBB) && isReachableFromEntry(UseBB) &&
+ "We only handle reachable blocks");
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// DominanceFrontier Implementation
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+ if (DefBB == UseBB)
+ return false;
-AnalysisID cfg::DominanceFrontier::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominanceFrontier>());
-AnalysisID cfg::DominanceFrontier::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominanceFrontier>());
+ const InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(Def);
+ if (!II)
+ return dominates(DefBB, UseBB);
-const cfg::DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
-cfg::DominanceFrontier::calcDomFrontier(const DominatorTree &DT,
- const DominatorTree::Node *Node) {
- // Loop over CFG successors to calculate DFlocal[Node]
- const BasicBlock *BB = Node->getNode();
- DomSetType &S = Frontiers[BB]; // The new set to fill in...
+ // Invoke results are only usable in the normal destination, not in the
+ // exceptional destination.
+ BasicBlock *NormalDest = II->getNormalDest();
+ if (!dominates(NormalDest, UseBB))
+ return false;
- for (BasicBlock::succ_const_iterator SI = BB->succ_begin(),
- SE = BB->succ_end(); SI != SE; ++SI) {
- // Does Node immediately dominate this successor?
- if (DT[*SI]->getIDom() != Node)
- S.insert(*SI);
- }
+ // Simple case: if the normal destination has a single predecessor, the
+ // fact that it dominates the use block implies that we also do.
+ if (NormalDest->getSinglePredecessor())
+ return true;
- // At this point, S is DFlocal. Now we union in DFup's of our children...
- // Loop through and visit the nodes that Node immediately dominates (Node's
- // children in the IDomTree)
+ // The normal edge from the invoke is critical. Conceptually, what we would
+ // like to do is split it and check if the new block dominates the use.
+ // With X being the new block, the graph would look like:
//
- for (DominatorTree::Node::const_iterator NI = Node->begin(), NE = Node->end();
- NI != NE; ++NI) {
- DominatorTree::Node *IDominee = *NI;
- const DomSetType &ChildDF = calcDomFrontier(DT, IDominee);
-
- DomSetType::const_iterator CDFI = ChildDF.begin(), CDFE = ChildDF.end();
- for (; CDFI != CDFE; ++CDFI) {
- if (!Node->dominates(DT[*CDFI]))
- S.insert(*CDFI);
- }
- }
-
- return S;
-}
-
-const cfg::DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
-cfg::DominanceFrontier::calcPostDomFrontier(const DominatorTree &DT,
- const DominatorTree::Node *Node) {
- // Loop over CFG successors to calculate DFlocal[Node]
- const BasicBlock *BB = Node->getNode();
- DomSetType &S = Frontiers[BB]; // The new set to fill in...
- if (!Root) return S;
-
- for (BasicBlock::pred_const_iterator SI = BB->pred_begin(),
- SE = BB->pred_end(); SI != SE; ++SI) {
- // Does Node immediately dominate this predeccessor?
- if (DT[*SI]->getIDom() != Node)
- S.insert(*SI);
- }
-
- // At this point, S is DFlocal. Now we union in DFup's of our children...
- // Loop through and visit the nodes that Node immediately dominates (Node's
- // children in the IDomTree)
+ // DefBB
+ // /\ . .
+ // / \ . .
+ // / \ . .
+ // / \ | |
+ // A X B C
+ // | \ | /
+ // . \|/
+ // . NormalDest
+ // .
//
- for (DominatorTree::Node::const_iterator NI = Node->begin(), NE = Node->end();
- NI != NE; ++NI) {
- DominatorTree::Node *IDominee = *NI;
- const DomSetType &ChildDF = calcPostDomFrontier(DT, IDominee);
-
- DomSetType::const_iterator CDFI = ChildDF.begin(), CDFE = ChildDF.end();
- for (; CDFI != CDFE; ++CDFI) {
- if (!Node->dominates(DT[*CDFI]))
- S.insert(*CDFI);
- }
+ // Given the definition of dominance, NormalDest is dominated by X iff X
+ // dominates all of NormalDest's predecessors (X, B, C in the example). X
+ // trivially dominates itself, so we only have to find if it dominates the
+ // other predecessors. Since the only way out of X is via NormalDest, X can
+ // only properly dominate a node if NormalDest dominates that node too.
+ for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(NormalDest),
+ E = pred_end(NormalDest); PI != E; ++PI) {
+ const BasicBlock *BB = *PI;
+ if (BB == DefBB)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!dominates(NormalDest, BB))
+ return false;
}
-
- return S;
+ return true;
}