-; RUN: llvm-as < %s -o /dev/null -f
+; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as -o /dev/null -f
-; This testcase failed due to a bad assertion in SymbolTable.cpp, removed in the 1.20 revision
-; Basically the symbol table assumed that if there was an abstract type in the symbol table,
-; [in this case for the entry %foo of type void(opaque)* ], that there should have also been
-; named types by now. This was obviously not the case here, and this is valid. Assertion
-; disabled.
+; This testcase failed due to a bad assertion in SymbolTable.cpp, removed in
+; the 1.20 revision. Basically the symbol table assumed that if there was an
+; abstract type in the symbol table, [in this case for the entry %foo of type
+; void(opaque)* ], that there should have also been named types by now. This
+; was obviously not the case here, and this is valid. Assertion disabled.
declare void "foo"(%bb)
%bb = type int