-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=arm | grep moveq | count 1
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=arm | grep movgt | count 1
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=arm | grep movlt | count 3
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=arm | grep movle | count 1
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=arm | grep movls | count 1
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=arm | grep movhi | count 1
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=arm -mattr=+vfp2 | \
-; RUN: grep fcpydmi | count 1
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=arm | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=arm -mattr=+vfp2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-VFP
+; RUN: llc < %s -mattr=+neon,+thumb2 -mtriple=thumbv7-apple-darwin | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NEON
define i32 @f1(i32 %a.s) {
+;CHECK: f1:
+;CHECK: moveq
entry:
%tmp = icmp eq i32 %a.s, 4
%tmp1.s = select i1 %tmp, i32 2, i32 3
}
define i32 @f2(i32 %a.s) {
+;CHECK: f2:
+;CHECK: movgt
entry:
%tmp = icmp sgt i32 %a.s, 4
%tmp1.s = select i1 %tmp, i32 2, i32 3
}
define i32 @f3(i32 %a.s, i32 %b.s) {
+;CHECK: f3:
+;CHECK: movlt
entry:
%tmp = icmp slt i32 %a.s, %b.s
%tmp1.s = select i1 %tmp, i32 2, i32 3
}
define i32 @f4(i32 %a.s, i32 %b.s) {
+;CHECK: f4:
+;CHECK: movle
entry:
%tmp = icmp sle i32 %a.s, %b.s
%tmp1.s = select i1 %tmp, i32 2, i32 3
}
define i32 @f5(i32 %a.u, i32 %b.u) {
+;CHECK: f5:
+;CHECK: movls
entry:
%tmp = icmp ule i32 %a.u, %b.u
%tmp1.s = select i1 %tmp, i32 2, i32 3
}
define i32 @f6(i32 %a.u, i32 %b.u) {
+;CHECK: f6:
+;CHECK: movhi
entry:
%tmp = icmp ugt i32 %a.u, %b.u
%tmp1.s = select i1 %tmp, i32 2, i32 3
}
define double @f7(double %a, double %b) {
+;CHECK: f7:
+;CHECK: movlt
+;CHECK: movlt
+;CHECK-VFP: f7:
+;CHECK-VFP: vmovmi
%tmp = fcmp olt double %a, 1.234e+00
%tmp1 = select i1 %tmp, double -1.000e+00, double %b
ret double %tmp1
}
+
+; <rdar://problem/7260094>
+;
+; We used to generate really horrible code for this function. The main cause was
+; a lack of a custom lowering routine for an ISD::SELECT. This would result in
+; two "it" blocks in the code: one for the "icmp" and another to move the index
+; into the constant pool based on the value of the "icmp". If we have one "it"
+; block generated, odds are good that we have close to the ideal code for this:
+;
+; CHECK-NEON: _f8:
+; CHECK-NEON: movw [[REGISTER_1:r[0-9]+]], #1123
+; CHECK-NEON-NEXT: movs [[REGISTER_2:r[0-9]+]], #0
+; CHECK-NEON-NEXT: cmp r0, [[REGISTER_1]]
+; CHECK-NEON-NEXT: adr [[REGISTER_3:r[0-9]+]], #LCPI
+; CHECK-NEON-NEXT: it eq
+; CHECK-NEON-NEXT: moveq [[REGISTER_2]], #4
+; CHECK-NEON-NEXT: ldr
+; CHECK-NEON: bx
+
+define arm_apcscc float @f8(i32 %a) nounwind {
+ %tmp = icmp eq i32 %a, 1123
+ %tmp1 = select i1 %tmp, float 0x3FF3BE76C0000000, float 0x40030E9A20000000
+ ret float %tmp1
+}