[Hexagon] Fixing load instruction parsing and reenabling tests.

[oota-llvm.git] / test / CodeGen / PowerPC / empty-functions.ll

diff --git a/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/empty-functions.ll b/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/empty-functions.ll
index 41fe5094daf586c69a4e3d6a11e0c5b84ad81656..aa760d82b1c7beb7f7a5ec2ed203c0112d712232 100644 (file)
--- a/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/empty-functions.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/empty-functions.ll
@@ -17,16 +17,18 @@ entry:
 
 ; An empty function is perfectly fine on ELF.
 ; LINUX-NO-FP: func:
+; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: {{^}}.L[[BEGIN:.*]]:{{$}}
 ; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: .cfi_startproc
 ; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: {{^}}#
-; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: {{^}}.L{{.*}}:{{$}}
-; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: .size   func, .L{{.*}}-func
+; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: {{^}}.L[[END:.*]]:{{$}}
+; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: .size   func, .L[[END]]-.L[[BEGIN]]
 ; LINUX-NO-FP-NEXT: .cfi_endproc
 
 ; A cfi directive can point to the end of a function. It (and in fact the
 ; entire body) could be optimized out because of the unreachable, but we
 ; don't do it right now.
 ; LINUX-FP: func:
+; LINUX-FP-NEXT: {{^}}.L[[BEGIN:.*]]:{{$}}
 ; LINUX-FP-NEXT: .cfi_startproc
 ; LINUX-FP-NEXT: {{^}}#
 ; LINUX-FP-NEXT: stw 31, -4(1)
@@ -38,6 +40,6 @@ entry:
 ; LINUX-FP-NEXT: mr 31, 1
 ; LINUX-FP-NEXT:{{^}}.L{{.*}}:{{$}}
 ; LINUX-FP-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_register r31
-; LINUX-FP-NEXT:{{^}}.L{{.*}}:{{$}}
-; LINUX-FP-NEXT: .size   func, .Lfunc_end0-func
+; LINUX-FP-NEXT: {{^}}.L[[END:.*]]:{{$}}
+; LINUX-FP-NEXT: .size   func, .L[[END]]-.L[[BEGIN]]
 ; LINUX-FP-NEXT: .cfi_endproc