; Test that the inliner doesn't leave around dead allocas, and that it folds
; uncond branches away after it is done specializing.
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -inline | llvm-dis | \
-; RUN: not grep {alloca.*uses=0}
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -inline | llvm-dis | \
-; RUN: not grep {br label}
+; RUN: opt < %s -inline -S | FileCheck %s
+
@A = weak global i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
@B = weak global i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
@C = weak global i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
declare void @ext(i32*)
define void @test() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test(
+; CHECK-NOT: ret
+;
+; FIXME: This should be a CHECK-NOT, but currently we have a bug that causes us
+; to not nuke unused allocas.
+; CHECK: alloca
+; CHECK-NOT: ret
+;
+; No branches should survive the inliner's cleanup.
+; CHECK-NOT: br
+; CHECK: ret void
+
entry:
tail call fastcc void @foo( i32 1 )
tail call fastcc void @foo( i32 2 )
tail call fastcc void @foo( i32 8 )
ret void
}
+
+declare void @f(i32 %x)
+
+define void @inner2(i32 %x, i32 %y, i32 %z, i1 %b) {
+entry:
+ %cmp1 = icmp ne i32 %x, 0
+ br i1 %cmp1, label %then1, label %end1
+
+then1:
+ call void @f(i32 %x)
+ br label %end1
+
+end1:
+ %x2 = and i32 %x, %z
+ %cmp2 = icmp sgt i32 %x2, 1
+ br i1 %cmp2, label %then2, label %end2
+
+then2:
+ call void @f(i32 %x2)
+ br label %end2
+
+end2:
+ %y2 = or i32 %y, %z
+ %cmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %y2, 0
+ br i1 %cmp3, label %then3, label %end3
+
+then3:
+ call void @f(i32 %y2)
+ br label %end3
+
+end3:
+ br i1 %b, label %end3.1, label %end3.2
+
+end3.1:
+ %x3.1 = or i32 %x, 10
+ br label %end3.3
+
+end3.2:
+ %x3.2 = or i32 %x, 10
+ br label %end3.3
+
+end3.3:
+ %x3.3 = phi i32 [ %x3.1, %end3.1 ], [ %x3.2, %end3.2 ]
+ %cmp4 = icmp slt i32 %x3.3, 1
+ br i1 %cmp4, label %then4, label %end4
+
+then4:
+ call void @f(i32 %x3.3)
+ br label %end4
+
+end4:
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @outer2(i32 %z, i1 %b) {
+; Ensure that after inlining, none of the blocks with a call to @f actually
+; make it through inlining.
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @outer2(
+; CHECK-NOT: call
+; CHECK: ret void
+
+entry:
+ call void @inner2(i32 0, i32 -1, i32 %z, i1 %b)
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @PR12470_inner(i16 signext %p1) nounwind uwtable {
+entry:
+ br i1 undef, label %cond.true, label %cond.false
+
+cond.true:
+ br label %cond.end
+
+cond.false:
+ %conv = sext i16 %p1 to i32
+ br label %cond.end
+
+cond.end:
+ %cond = phi i32 [ undef, %cond.true ], [ 0, %cond.false ]
+ %tobool = icmp eq i32 %cond, 0
+ br i1 %tobool, label %if.end5, label %if.then
+
+if.then:
+ ret void
+
+if.end5:
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @PR12470_outer() {
+; This previously crashed during inliner cleanup and folding inner return
+; instructions. Check that we don't crash and we produce a function with a single
+; return instruction due to merging the returns of the inlined function.
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @PR12470_outer(
+; CHECK-NOT: call
+; CHECK: ret void
+; CHECK-NOT: ret void
+; CHECK: }
+
+entry:
+ call void @PR12470_inner(i16 signext 1)
+ ret void
+}
+
+define void @crasher_inner() nounwind uwtable {
+entry:
+ br i1 false, label %for.end28, label %for.body6
+
+for.body6:
+ br i1 undef, label %for.body6, label %for.cond12.for.inc26_crit_edge
+
+for.cond12.for.inc26_crit_edge:
+ br label %for.body6.1
+
+for.end28:
+ ret void
+
+for.body6.1:
+ br i1 undef, label %for.body6.1, label %for.cond12.for.inc26_crit_edge.1
+
+for.cond12.for.inc26_crit_edge.1:
+ br label %for.body6.2
+
+for.body6.2:
+ br i1 undef, label %for.body6.2, label %for.cond12.for.inc26_crit_edge.2
+
+for.cond12.for.inc26_crit_edge.2:
+ br label %for.end28
+}
+
+define void @crasher_outer() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @crasher_outer(
+; CHECK-NOT: call
+; CHECK: ret void
+; CHECK-NOT: ret
+; CHECK: }
+entry:
+ tail call void @crasher_inner()
+ ret void
+}