#include "DisassemblerEmitter.h"
#include "CodeGenTarget.h"
#include "Record.h"
+#include "X86DisassemblerTables.h"
+#include "X86RecognizableInstr.h"
+#include "ARMDecoderEmitter.h"
+
using namespace llvm;
+using namespace llvm::X86Disassembler;
+
+/// DisassemblerEmitter - Contains disassembler table emitters for various
+/// architectures.
+
+/// X86 Disassembler Emitter
+///
+/// *** IF YOU'RE HERE TO RESOLVE A "Primary decode conflict", LOOK DOWN NEAR
+/// THE END OF THIS COMMENT!
+///
+/// The X86 disassembler emitter is part of the X86 Disassembler, which is
+/// documented in lib/Target/X86/X86Disassembler.h.
+///
+/// The emitter produces the tables that the disassembler uses to translate
+/// instructions. The emitter generates the following tables:
+///
+/// - One table (CONTEXTS_SYM) that contains a mapping of attribute masks to
+/// instruction contexts. Although for each attribute there are cases where
+/// that attribute determines decoding, in the majority of cases decoding is
+/// the same whether or not an attribute is present. For example, a 64-bit
+/// instruction with an OPSIZE prefix and an XS prefix decodes the same way in
+/// all cases as a 64-bit instruction with only OPSIZE set. (The XS prefix
+/// may have effects on its execution, but does not change the instruction
+/// returned.) This allows considerable space savings in other tables.
+/// - Four tables (ONEBYTE_SYM, TWOBYTE_SYM, THREEBYTE38_SYM, and
+/// THREEBYTE3A_SYM) contain the hierarchy that the decoder traverses while
+/// decoding an instruction. At the lowest level of this hierarchy are
+/// instruction UIDs, 16-bit integers that can be used to uniquely identify
+/// the instruction and correspond exactly to its position in the list of
+/// CodeGenInstructions for the target.
+/// - One table (INSTRUCTIONS_SYM) contains information about the operands of
+/// each instruction and how to decode them.
+///
+/// During table generation, there may be conflicts between instructions that
+/// occupy the same space in the decode tables. These conflicts are resolved as
+/// follows in setTableFields() (X86DisassemblerTables.cpp)
+///
+/// - If the current context is the native context for one of the instructions
+/// (that is, the attributes specified for it in the LLVM tables specify
+/// precisely the current context), then it has priority.
+/// - If the current context isn't native for either of the instructions, then
+/// the higher-priority context wins (that is, the one that is more specific).
+/// That hierarchy is determined by outranks() (X86DisassemblerTables.cpp)
+/// - If the current context is native for both instructions, then the table
+/// emitter reports a conflict and dies.
+///
+/// *** RESOLUTION FOR "Primary decode conflict"S
+///
+/// If two instructions collide, typically the solution is (in order of
+/// likelihood):
+///
+/// (1) to filter out one of the instructions by editing filter()
+/// (X86RecognizableInstr.cpp). This is the most common resolution, but
+/// check the Intel manuals first to make sure that (2) and (3) are not the
+/// problem.
+/// (2) to fix the tables (X86.td and its subsidiaries) so the opcodes are
+/// accurate. Sometimes they are not.
+/// (3) to fix the tables to reflect the actual context (for example, required
+/// prefixes), and possibly to add a new context by editing
+/// lib/Target/X86/X86DisassemblerDecoderCommon.h. This is unlikely to be
+/// the cause.
+///
+/// DisassemblerEmitter.cpp contains the implementation for the emitter,
+/// which simply pulls out instructions from the CodeGenTarget and pushes them
+/// into X86DisassemblerTables.
+/// X86DisassemblerTables.h contains the interface for the instruction tables,
+/// which manage and emit the structures discussed above.
+/// X86DisassemblerTables.cpp contains the implementation for the instruction
+/// tables.
+/// X86ModRMFilters.h contains filters that can be used to determine which
+/// ModR/M values are valid for a particular instruction. These are used to
+/// populate ModRMDecisions.
+/// X86RecognizableInstr.h contains the interface for a single instruction,
+/// which knows how to translate itself from a CodeGenInstruction and provide
+/// the information necessary for integration into the tables.
+/// X86RecognizableInstr.cpp contains the implementation for a single
+/// instruction.
void DisassemblerEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
CodeGenTarget Target;
<< " *===---------------------------------------------------------------"
<< "-------===*/\n";
+ // X86 uses a custom disassembler.
+ if (Target.getName() == "X86") {
+ DisassemblerTables Tables;
+
+ const std::vector<const CodeGenInstruction*> &numberedInstructions =
+ Target.getInstructionsByEnumValue();
+
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = numberedInstructions.size(); i != e; ++i)
+ RecognizableInstr::processInstr(Tables, *numberedInstructions[i], i);
+
+ // FIXME: As long as we are using exceptions, might as well drop this to the
+ // actual conflict site.
+ if (Tables.hasConflicts())
+ throw TGError(Target.getTargetRecord()->getLoc(),
+ "Primary decode conflict");
+
+ Tables.emit(OS);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Fixed-instruction-length targets use a common disassembler.
+ if (Target.getName() == "ARM") {
+ ARMDecoderEmitter(Records).run(OS);
+ return;
+ }
+
throw TGError(Target.getTargetRecord()->getLoc(),
"Unable to generate disassembler for this target");
}