Merge remote-tracking branches 'regulator/fix/anatop', 'regulator/fix/gpio', 'regulat...

[firefly-linux-kernel-4.4.55.git] / virt / kvm / kvm_main.c

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index d8db2f8fce9c7ab727fb5dfa957d5f7ba828fa42..04146a2e1d8191e3e152954824594555884f5f6d 100644 (file)
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -66,9 +66,18 @@
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Qumranet");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
-static unsigned int halt_poll_ns;
+/* halt polling only reduces halt latency by 5-7 us, 500us is enough */
+static unsigned int halt_poll_ns = 500000;
 module_param(halt_poll_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
 
+/* Default doubles per-vcpu halt_poll_ns. */
+static unsigned int halt_poll_ns_grow = 2;
+module_param(halt_poll_ns_grow, int, S_IRUGO);
+
+/* Default resets per-vcpu halt_poll_ns . */
+static unsigned int halt_poll_ns_shrink;
+module_param(halt_poll_ns_shrink, int, S_IRUGO);
+
 /*
  * Ordering of locks:
  *
@@ -217,6 +226,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id)
        vcpu->kvm = kvm;
        vcpu->vcpu_id = id;
        vcpu->pid = NULL;
+       vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
        init_waitqueue_head(&vcpu->wq);
        kvm_async_pf_vcpu_init(vcpu);
 
@@ -387,6 +397,36 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
        return young;
 }
 
+static int kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+                                       struct mm_struct *mm,
+                                       unsigned long start,
+                                       unsigned long end)
+{
+       struct kvm *kvm = mmu_notifier_to_kvm(mn);
+       int young, idx;
+
+       idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+       spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+       /*
+        * Even though we do not flush TLB, this will still adversely
+        * affect performance on pre-Haswell Intel EPT, where there is
+        * no EPT Access Bit to clear so that we have to tear down EPT
+        * tables instead. If we find this unacceptable, we can always
+        * add a parameter to kvm_age_hva so that it effectively doesn't
+        * do anything on clear_young.
+        *
+        * Also note that currently we never issue secondary TLB flushes
+        * from clear_young, leaving this job up to the regular system
+        * cadence. If we find this inaccurate, we might come up with a
+        * more sophisticated heuristic later.
+        */
+       young = kvm_age_hva(kvm, start, end);
+       spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+       srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+
+       return young;
+}
+
 static int kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
                                       struct mm_struct *mm,
                                       unsigned long address)
@@ -419,6 +459,7 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops kvm_mmu_notifier_ops = {
        .invalidate_range_start = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start,
        .invalidate_range_end   = kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end,
        .clear_flush_young      = kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young,
+       .clear_young            = kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_young,
        .test_young             = kvm_mmu_notifier_test_young,
        .change_pte             = kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte,
        .release                = kvm_mmu_notifier_release,
@@ -1906,6 +1947,35 @@ void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty);
 
+static void grow_halt_poll_ns(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       int old, val;
+
+       old = val = vcpu->halt_poll_ns;
+       /* 10us base */
+       if (val == 0 && halt_poll_ns_grow)
+               val = 10000;
+       else
+               val *= halt_poll_ns_grow;
+
+       vcpu->halt_poll_ns = val;
+       trace_kvm_halt_poll_ns_grow(vcpu->vcpu_id, val, old);
+}
+
+static void shrink_halt_poll_ns(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+       int old, val;
+
+       old = val = vcpu->halt_poll_ns;
+       if (halt_poll_ns_shrink == 0)
+               val = 0;
+       else
+               val /= halt_poll_ns_shrink;
+
+       vcpu->halt_poll_ns = val;
+       trace_kvm_halt_poll_ns_shrink(vcpu->vcpu_id, val, old);
+}
+
 static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
        if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
@@ -1928,11 +1998,13 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        ktime_t start, cur;
        DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
        bool waited = false;
+       u64 block_ns;
 
        start = cur = ktime_get();
-       if (halt_poll_ns) {
-               ktime_t stop = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), halt_poll_ns);
+       if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns) {
+               ktime_t stop = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), vcpu->halt_poll_ns);
 
+               ++vcpu->stat.halt_attempted_poll;
                do {
                        /*
                         * This sets KVM_REQ_UNHALT if an interrupt
@@ -1960,7 +2032,22 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        cur = ktime_get();
 
 out:
-       trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start), waited);
+       block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
+
+       if (halt_poll_ns) {
+               if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
+                       ;
+               /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
+               else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
+                       shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
+               /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
+               else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
+                       block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
+                       grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
+       } else
+               vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
+
+       trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_block);
 
@@ -3071,10 +3158,25 @@ static void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct kvm_io_bus *bus)
 static inline int kvm_io_bus_cmp(const struct kvm_io_range *r1,
                                 const struct kvm_io_range *r2)
 {
-       if (r1->addr < r2->addr)
+       gpa_t addr1 = r1->addr;
+       gpa_t addr2 = r2->addr;
+
+       if (addr1 < addr2)
                return -1;
-       if (r1->addr + r1->len > r2->addr + r2->len)
+
+       /* If r2->len == 0, match the exact address.  If r2->len != 0,
+        * accept any overlapping write.  Any order is acceptable for
+        * overlapping ranges, because kvm_io_bus_get_first_dev ensures
+        * we process all of them.
+        */
+       if (r2->len) {
+               addr1 += r1->len;
+               addr2 += r2->len;
+       }
+
+       if (addr1 > addr2)
                return 1;
+
        return 0;
 }