X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lib%2FAnalysis%2FLint.cpp;h=48ea8885e310cb4ce62386e61748963d3d07d5bb;hb=5f36b46bf0fa9dbdb6caede9a6a1d65a640c4e1a;hp=5c44638fbb074ac63c2ba8d1ac6b9e5a11eb8839;hpb=67f6bf70d2cdb8fe74fe6872d90b7d09afe5dd69;p=oota-llvm.git diff --git a/lib/Analysis/Lint.cpp b/lib/Analysis/Lint.cpp index 5c44638fbb0..48ea8885e31 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/Lint.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/Lint.cpp @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ // those aren't comprehensive either. Second, many conditions cannot be // checked statically. This pass does no dynamic instrumentation, so it // can't check for all possible problems. -// +// // Another limitation is that it assumes all code will be executed. A store // through a null pointer in a basic block which is never reached is harmless, // but this pass will warn about it anyway. This is the main reason why most @@ -26,17 +26,18 @@ // less obvious. If an optimization pass appears to be introducing a warning, // it may be that the optimization pass is merely exposing an existing // condition in the code. -// +// // This code may be run before instcombine. In many cases, instcombine checks // for the same kinds of things and turns instructions with undefined behavior // into unreachable (or equivalent). Because of this, this pass makes some // effort to look through bitcasts and so on. -// +// //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #include "llvm/Analysis/Lint.h" #include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/AssumptionTracker.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h" #include "llvm/Analysis/Loads.h" @@ -96,11 +97,12 @@ namespace { Value *findValue(Value *V, bool OffsetOk) const; Value *findValueImpl(Value *V, bool OffsetOk, - SmallPtrSet &Visited) const; + SmallPtrSetImpl &Visited) const; public: Module *Mod; AliasAnalysis *AA; + AssumptionTracker *AT; DominatorTree *DT; const DataLayout *DL; TargetLibraryInfo *TLI; @@ -118,6 +120,7 @@ namespace { void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override { AU.setPreservesAll(); AU.addRequired(); + AU.addRequired(); AU.addRequired(); AU.addRequired(); } @@ -137,8 +140,8 @@ namespace { // that failed. This provides a nice place to put a breakpoint if you want // to see why something is not correct. void CheckFailed(const Twine &Message, - const Value *V1 = 0, const Value *V2 = 0, - const Value *V3 = 0, const Value *V4 = 0) { + const Value *V1 = nullptr, const Value *V2 = nullptr, + const Value *V3 = nullptr, const Value *V4 = nullptr) { MessagesStr << Message.str() << "\n"; WriteValue(V1); WriteValue(V2); @@ -151,6 +154,7 @@ namespace { char Lint::ID = 0; INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(Lint, "lint", "Statically lint-checks LLVM IR", false, true) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(AssumptionTracker) INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfo) INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass) INITIALIZE_AG_DEPENDENCY(AliasAnalysis) @@ -175,9 +179,10 @@ INITIALIZE_PASS_END(Lint, "lint", "Statically lint-checks LLVM IR", bool Lint::runOnFunction(Function &F) { Mod = F.getParent(); AA = &getAnalysis(); + AT = &getAnalysis(); DT = &getAnalysis().getDomTree(); DataLayoutPass *DLP = getAnalysisIfAvailable(); - DL = DLP ? &DLP->getDataLayout() : 0; + DL = DLP ? &DLP->getDataLayout() : nullptr; TLI = &getAnalysis(); visit(F); dbgs() << MessagesStr.str(); @@ -199,7 +204,7 @@ void Lint::visitCallSite(CallSite CS) { Value *Callee = CS.getCalledValue(); visitMemoryReference(I, Callee, AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - 0, 0, MemRef::Callee); + 0, nullptr, MemRef::Callee); if (Function *F = dyn_cast(findValue(Callee, /*OffsetOk=*/false))) { Assert1(CS.getCallingConv() == F->getCallingConv(), @@ -275,10 +280,10 @@ void Lint::visitCallSite(CallSite CS) { MemCpyInst *MCI = cast(&I); // TODO: If the size is known, use it. visitMemoryReference(I, MCI->getDest(), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - MCI->getAlignment(), 0, + MCI->getAlignment(), nullptr, MemRef::Write); visitMemoryReference(I, MCI->getSource(), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - MCI->getAlignment(), 0, + MCI->getAlignment(), nullptr, MemRef::Read); // Check that the memcpy arguments don't overlap. The AliasAnalysis API @@ -299,10 +304,10 @@ void Lint::visitCallSite(CallSite CS) { MemMoveInst *MMI = cast(&I); // TODO: If the size is known, use it. visitMemoryReference(I, MMI->getDest(), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - MMI->getAlignment(), 0, + MMI->getAlignment(), nullptr, MemRef::Write); visitMemoryReference(I, MMI->getSource(), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - MMI->getAlignment(), 0, + MMI->getAlignment(), nullptr, MemRef::Read); break; } @@ -310,7 +315,7 @@ void Lint::visitCallSite(CallSite CS) { MemSetInst *MSI = cast(&I); // TODO: If the size is known, use it. visitMemoryReference(I, MSI->getDest(), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - MSI->getAlignment(), 0, + MSI->getAlignment(), nullptr, MemRef::Write); break; } @@ -321,17 +326,17 @@ void Lint::visitCallSite(CallSite CS) { &I); visitMemoryReference(I, CS.getArgument(0), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - 0, 0, MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); + 0, nullptr, MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); break; case Intrinsic::vacopy: visitMemoryReference(I, CS.getArgument(0), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - 0, 0, MemRef::Write); + 0, nullptr, MemRef::Write); visitMemoryReference(I, CS.getArgument(1), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - 0, 0, MemRef::Read); + 0, nullptr, MemRef::Read); break; case Intrinsic::vaend: visitMemoryReference(I, CS.getArgument(0), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - 0, 0, MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); + 0, nullptr, MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); break; case Intrinsic::stackrestore: @@ -339,7 +344,7 @@ void Lint::visitCallSite(CallSite CS) { // stack pointer, which the compiler may read from or write to // at any time, so check it for both readability and writeability. visitMemoryReference(I, CS.getArgument(0), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, - 0, 0, MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); + 0, nullptr, MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); break; } } @@ -504,7 +509,8 @@ void Lint::visitShl(BinaryOperator &I) { "Undefined result: Shift count out of range", &I); } -static bool isZero(Value *V, const DataLayout *DL) { +static bool isZero(Value *V, const DataLayout *DL, DominatorTree *DT, + AssumptionTracker *AT) { // Assume undef could be zero. if (isa(V)) return true; @@ -513,7 +519,8 @@ static bool isZero(Value *V, const DataLayout *DL) { if (!VecTy) { unsigned BitWidth = V->getType()->getIntegerBitWidth(); APInt KnownZero(BitWidth, 0), KnownOne(BitWidth, 0); - ComputeMaskedBits(V, KnownZero, KnownOne, DL); + computeKnownBits(V, KnownZero, KnownOne, DL, + 0, AT, dyn_cast(V), DT); return KnownZero.isAllOnesValue(); } @@ -534,7 +541,7 @@ static bool isZero(Value *V, const DataLayout *DL) { return true; APInt KnownZero(BitWidth, 0), KnownOne(BitWidth, 0); - ComputeMaskedBits(Elem, KnownZero, KnownOne, DL); + computeKnownBits(Elem, KnownZero, KnownOne, DL); if (KnownZero.isAllOnesValue()) return true; } @@ -543,22 +550,22 @@ static bool isZero(Value *V, const DataLayout *DL) { } void Lint::visitSDiv(BinaryOperator &I) { - Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL), + Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL, DT, AT), "Undefined behavior: Division by zero", &I); } void Lint::visitUDiv(BinaryOperator &I) { - Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL), + Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL, DT, AT), "Undefined behavior: Division by zero", &I); } void Lint::visitSRem(BinaryOperator &I) { - Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL), + Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL, DT, AT), "Undefined behavior: Division by zero", &I); } void Lint::visitURem(BinaryOperator &I) { - Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL), + Assert1(!isZero(I.getOperand(1), DL, DT, AT), "Undefined behavior: Division by zero", &I); } @@ -572,13 +579,13 @@ void Lint::visitAllocaInst(AllocaInst &I) { } void Lint::visitVAArgInst(VAArgInst &I) { - visitMemoryReference(I, I.getOperand(0), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, 0, 0, - MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); + visitMemoryReference(I, I.getOperand(0), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, 0, + nullptr, MemRef::Read | MemRef::Write); } void Lint::visitIndirectBrInst(IndirectBrInst &I) { - visitMemoryReference(I, I.getAddress(), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, 0, 0, - MemRef::Branchee); + visitMemoryReference(I, I.getAddress(), AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, 0, + nullptr, MemRef::Branchee); Assert1(I.getNumDestinations() != 0, "Undefined behavior: indirectbr with no destinations", &I); @@ -622,7 +629,7 @@ Value *Lint::findValue(Value *V, bool OffsetOk) const { /// findValueImpl - Implementation helper for findValue. Value *Lint::findValueImpl(Value *V, bool OffsetOk, - SmallPtrSet &Visited) const { + SmallPtrSetImpl &Visited) const { // Detect self-referential values. if (!Visited.insert(V)) return UndefValue::get(V->getType()); @@ -652,8 +659,7 @@ Value *Lint::findValueImpl(Value *V, bool OffsetOk, if (W != V) return findValueImpl(W, OffsetOk, Visited); } else if (CastInst *CI = dyn_cast(V)) { - if (CI->isNoopCast(DL ? DL->getIntPtrType(V->getContext()) : - Type::getInt64Ty(V->getContext()))) + if (CI->isNoopCast(DL)) return findValueImpl(CI->getOperand(0), OffsetOk, Visited); } else if (ExtractValueInst *Ex = dyn_cast(V)) { if (Value *W = FindInsertedValue(Ex->getAggregateOperand(), @@ -666,7 +672,7 @@ Value *Lint::findValueImpl(Value *V, bool OffsetOk, if (CastInst::isNoopCast(Instruction::CastOps(CE->getOpcode()), CE->getOperand(0)->getType(), CE->getType(), - DL ? DL->getIntPtrType(V->getContext()) : + DL ? DL->getIntPtrType(V->getType()) : Type::getInt64Ty(V->getContext()))) return findValueImpl(CE->getOperand(0), OffsetOk, Visited); } else if (CE->getOpcode() == Instruction::ExtractValue) { @@ -679,7 +685,7 @@ Value *Lint::findValueImpl(Value *V, bool OffsetOk, // As a last resort, try SimplifyInstruction or constant folding. if (Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast(V)) { - if (Value *W = SimplifyInstruction(Inst, DL, TLI, DT)) + if (Value *W = SimplifyInstruction(Inst, DL, TLI, DT, AT)) return findValueImpl(W, OffsetOk, Visited); } else if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast(V)) { if (Value *W = ConstantFoldConstantExpression(CE, DL, TLI))