X-Git-Url: http://demsky.eecs.uci.edu/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=lib%2FCodeGen%2FBranchFolding.cpp;h=7f98df0d22ea4318f0bc4256771df7de03717975;hb=98ec91ea80e042907aac8d3cbd9614d29f6cba45;hp=4f76aac27991f7031f143b4d252e1f62c9025221;hpb=071c62fad0b25ad4131e7f984173a796c1e63f61;p=oota-llvm.git diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp index 4f76aac2799..7f98df0d22e 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp @@ -105,17 +105,6 @@ void BranchFolder::RemoveDeadBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { while (!MBB->succ_empty()) MBB->removeSuccessor(MBB->succ_end()-1); - // If there are any labels in the basic block, unregister them from - // MachineModuleInfo. - if (MMI && !MBB->empty()) { - for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB->begin(), E = MBB->end(); - I != E; ++I) { - if (I->isLabel()) - // The label ID # is always operand #0, an immediate. - MMI->InvalidateLabel(I->getOperand(0).getImm()); - } - } - // Remove the block. MF->erase(MBB); } @@ -133,7 +122,7 @@ bool BranchFolder::OptimizeImpDefsBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { SmallSet ImpDefRegs; MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB->begin(); while (I != MBB->end()) { - if (I->getOpcode() != TargetInstrInfo::IMPLICIT_DEF) + if (!I->isImplicitDef()) break; unsigned Reg = I->getOperand(0).getReg(); ImpDefRegs.insert(Reg); @@ -203,7 +192,7 @@ bool BranchFolder::OptimizeFunction(MachineFunction &MF, MadeChange |= MadeChangeThisIteration; } - // See if any jump tables have become mergable or dead as the code generator + // See if any jump tables have become dead as the code generator // did its thing. MachineJumpTableInfo *JTI = MF.getJumpTableInfo(); if (JTI == 0) { @@ -211,27 +200,8 @@ bool BranchFolder::OptimizeFunction(MachineFunction &MF, return MadeChange; } - const std::vector &JTs = JTI->getJumpTables(); - // Figure out how these jump tables should be merged. - std::vector JTMapping; - JTMapping.reserve(JTs.size()); - - // We always keep the 0th jump table. - JTMapping.push_back(0); - - // Scan the jump tables, seeing if there are any duplicates. Note that this - // is N^2, which should be fixed someday. - for (unsigned i = 1, e = JTs.size(); i != e; ++i) { - if (JTs[i].MBBs.empty()) - JTMapping.push_back(i); - else - JTMapping.push_back(JTI->getJumpTableIndex(JTs[i].MBBs)); - } - - // If a jump table was merge with another one, walk the function rewriting - // references to jump tables to reference the new JT ID's. Keep track of - // whether we see a jump table idx, if not, we can delete the JT. - BitVector JTIsLive(JTs.size()); + // Walk the function to find jump tables that are live. + BitVector JTIsLive(JTI->getJumpTables().size()); for (MachineFunction::iterator BB = MF.begin(), E = MF.end(); BB != E; ++BB) { for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); @@ -239,17 +209,14 @@ bool BranchFolder::OptimizeFunction(MachineFunction &MF, for (unsigned op = 0, e = I->getNumOperands(); op != e; ++op) { MachineOperand &Op = I->getOperand(op); if (!Op.isJTI()) continue; - unsigned NewIdx = JTMapping[Op.getIndex()]; - Op.setIndex(NewIdx); // Remember that this JT is live. - JTIsLive.set(NewIdx); + JTIsLive.set(Op.getIndex()); } } - // Finally, remove dead jump tables. This happens either because the - // indirect jump was unreachable (and thus deleted) or because the jump - // table was merged with some other one. + // Finally, remove dead jump tables. This happens when the + // indirect jump was unreachable (and thus deleted). for (unsigned i = 0, e = JTIsLive.size(); i != e; ++i) if (!JTIsLive.test(i)) { JTI->RemoveJumpTable(i); @@ -297,28 +264,21 @@ static unsigned HashMachineInstr(const MachineInstr *MI) { return Hash; } -/// HashEndOfMBB - Hash the last few instructions in the MBB. For blocks -/// with no successors, we hash two instructions, because cross-jumping -/// only saves code when at least two instructions are removed (since a -/// branch must be inserted). For blocks with a successor, one of the -/// two blocks to be tail-merged will end with a branch already, so -/// it gains to cross-jump even for one instruction. -static unsigned HashEndOfMBB(const MachineBasicBlock *MBB, - unsigned minCommonTailLength) { +/// HashEndOfMBB - Hash the last instruction in the MBB. +static unsigned HashEndOfMBB(const MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { MachineBasicBlock::const_iterator I = MBB->end(); if (I == MBB->begin()) return 0; // Empty MBB. --I; - unsigned Hash = HashMachineInstr(I); - - if (I == MBB->begin() || minCommonTailLength == 1) - return Hash; // Single instr MBB. + // Skip debug info so it will not affect codegen. + while (I->isDebugValue()) { + if (I==MBB->begin()) + return 0; // MBB empty except for debug info. + --I; + } - --I; - // Hash in the second-to-last instruction. - Hash ^= HashMachineInstr(I) << 2; - return Hash; + return HashMachineInstr(I); } /// ComputeCommonTailLength - Given two machine basic blocks, compute the number @@ -334,39 +294,74 @@ static unsigned ComputeCommonTailLength(MachineBasicBlock *MBB1, unsigned TailLen = 0; while (I1 != MBB1->begin() && I2 != MBB2->begin()) { --I1; --I2; + // Skip debugging pseudos; necessary to avoid changing the code. + while (I1->isDebugValue()) { + if (I1==MBB1->begin()) { + while (I2->isDebugValue()) { + if (I2==MBB2->begin()) + // I1==DBG at begin; I2==DBG at begin + return TailLen; + --I2; + } + ++I2; + // I1==DBG at begin; I2==non-DBG, or first of DBGs not at begin + return TailLen; + } + --I1; + } + // I1==first (untested) non-DBG preceding known match + while (I2->isDebugValue()) { + if (I2==MBB2->begin()) { + ++I1; + // I1==non-DBG, or first of DBGs not at begin; I2==DBG at begin + return TailLen; + } + --I2; + } + // I1, I2==first (untested) non-DBGs preceding known match if (!I1->isIdenticalTo(I2) || // FIXME: This check is dubious. It's used to get around a problem where // people incorrectly expect inline asm directives to remain in the same // relative order. This is untenable because normal compiler // optimizations (like this one) may reorder and/or merge these // directives. - I1->getOpcode() == TargetInstrInfo::INLINEASM) { + I1->isInlineAsm()) { ++I1; ++I2; break; } ++TailLen; } + // Back past possible debugging pseudos at beginning of block. This matters + // when one block differs from the other only by whether debugging pseudos + // are present at the beginning. (This way, the various checks later for + // I1==MBB1->begin() work as expected.) + if (I1 == MBB1->begin() && I2 != MBB2->begin()) { + --I2; + while (I2->isDebugValue()) { + if (I2 == MBB2->begin()) { + return TailLen; + } + --I2; + } + ++I2; + } + if (I2 == MBB2->begin() && I1 != MBB1->begin()) { + --I1; + while (I1->isDebugValue()) { + if (I1 == MBB1->begin()) + return TailLen; + --I1; + } + ++I1; + } return TailLen; } /// ReplaceTailWithBranchTo - Delete the instruction OldInst and everything -/// after it, replacing it with an unconditional branch to NewDest. This -/// returns true if OldInst's block is modified, false if NewDest is modified. +/// after it, replacing it with an unconditional branch to NewDest. void BranchFolder::ReplaceTailWithBranchTo(MachineBasicBlock::iterator OldInst, MachineBasicBlock *NewDest) { - MachineBasicBlock *OldBB = OldInst->getParent(); - - // Remove all the old successors of OldBB from the CFG. - while (!OldBB->succ_empty()) - OldBB->removeSuccessor(OldBB->succ_begin()); - - // Remove all the dead instructions from the end of OldBB. - OldBB->erase(OldInst, OldBB->end()); - - // If OldBB isn't immediately before OldBB, insert a branch to it. - if (++MachineFunction::iterator(OldBB) != MachineFunction::iterator(NewDest)) - TII->InsertBranch(*OldBB, NewDest, 0, SmallVector()); - OldBB->addSuccessor(NewDest); + TII->ReplaceTailWithBranchTo(OldInst, NewDest); ++NumTailMerge; } @@ -375,6 +370,9 @@ void BranchFolder::ReplaceTailWithBranchTo(MachineBasicBlock::iterator OldInst, /// iterator. This returns the new MBB. MachineBasicBlock *BranchFolder::SplitMBBAt(MachineBasicBlock &CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator BBI1) { + if (!TII->isLegalToSplitMBBAt(CurMBB, BBI1)) + return 0; + MachineFunction &MF = *CurMBB.getParent(); // Create the fall-through block. @@ -412,6 +410,8 @@ static unsigned EstimateRuntime(MachineBasicBlock::iterator I, MachineBasicBlock::iterator E) { unsigned Time = 0; for (; I != E; ++I) { + if (I->isDebugValue()) + continue; const TargetInstrDesc &TID = I->getDesc(); if (TID.isCall()) Time += 10; @@ -433,18 +433,20 @@ static void FixTail(MachineBasicBlock *CurMBB, MachineBasicBlock *SuccBB, MachineFunction::iterator I = llvm::next(MachineFunction::iterator(CurMBB)); MachineBasicBlock *TBB = 0, *FBB = 0; SmallVector Cond; + DebugLoc dl; // FIXME: this is nowhere if (I != MF->end() && !TII->AnalyzeBranch(*CurMBB, TBB, FBB, Cond, true)) { MachineBasicBlock *NextBB = I; if (TBB == NextBB && !Cond.empty() && !FBB) { if (!TII->ReverseBranchCondition(Cond)) { TII->RemoveBranch(*CurMBB); - TII->InsertBranch(*CurMBB, SuccBB, NULL, Cond); + TII->InsertBranch(*CurMBB, SuccBB, NULL, Cond, dl); return; } } } - TII->InsertBranch(*CurMBB, SuccBB, NULL, SmallVector()); + TII->InsertBranch(*CurMBB, SuccBB, NULL, + SmallVector(), dl); } bool @@ -615,9 +617,10 @@ void BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash(unsigned CurHash, /// CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock - None of the blocks to be tail-merged consist /// only of the common tail. Create a block that does by splitting one. -unsigned BranchFolder::CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *&PredBB, - unsigned maxCommonTailLength) { - unsigned commonTailIndex = 0; +bool BranchFolder::CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *&PredBB, + unsigned maxCommonTailLength, + unsigned &commonTailIndex) { + commonTailIndex = 0; unsigned TimeEstimate = ~0U; for (unsigned i = 0, e = SameTails.size(); i != e; ++i) { // Use PredBB if possible; that doesn't require a new branch. @@ -639,10 +642,17 @@ unsigned BranchFolder::CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *&PredBB, SameTails[commonTailIndex].getTailStartPos(); MachineBasicBlock *MBB = SameTails[commonTailIndex].getBlock(); + // If the common tail includes any debug info we will take it pretty + // randomly from one of the inputs. Might be better to remove it? DEBUG(dbgs() << "\nSplitting BB#" << MBB->getNumber() << ", size " << maxCommonTailLength); MachineBasicBlock *newMBB = SplitMBBAt(*MBB, BBI); + if (!newMBB) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "... failed!"); + return false; + } + SameTails[commonTailIndex].setBlock(newMBB); SameTails[commonTailIndex].setTailStartPos(newMBB->begin()); @@ -650,7 +660,7 @@ unsigned BranchFolder::CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *&PredBB, if (PredBB == MBB) PredBB = newMBB; - return commonTailIndex; + return true; } // See if any of the blocks in MergePotentials (which all have a common single @@ -745,7 +755,11 @@ bool BranchFolder::TryTailMergeBlocks(MachineBasicBlock *SuccBB, !SameTails[commonTailIndex].tailIsWholeBlock())) { // None of the blocks consist entirely of the common tail. // Split a block so that one does. - commonTailIndex = CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(PredBB, maxCommonTailLength); + if (!CreateCommonTailOnlyBlock(PredBB, + maxCommonTailLength, commonTailIndex)) { + RemoveBlocksWithHash(CurHash, SuccBB, PredBB); + continue; + } } MachineBasicBlock *MBB = SameTails[commonTailIndex].getBlock(); @@ -781,7 +795,7 @@ bool BranchFolder::TailMergeBlocks(MachineFunction &MF) { MergePotentials.clear(); for (MachineFunction::iterator I = MF.begin(), E = MF.end(); I != E; ++I) { if (I->succ_empty()) - MergePotentials.push_back(MergePotentialsElt(HashEndOfMBB(I, 2U), I)); + MergePotentials.push_back(MergePotentialsElt(HashEndOfMBB(I), I)); } // See if we can do any tail merging on those. @@ -862,13 +876,13 @@ bool BranchFolder::TailMergeBlocks(MachineFunction &MF) { } // Remove the unconditional branch at the end, if any. if (TBB && (Cond.empty() || FBB)) { + DebugLoc dl; // FIXME: this is nowhere TII->RemoveBranch(*PBB); if (!Cond.empty()) // reinsert conditional branch only, for now - TII->InsertBranch(*PBB, (TBB == IBB) ? FBB : TBB, 0, NewCond); + TII->InsertBranch(*PBB, (TBB == IBB) ? FBB : TBB, 0, NewCond, dl); } - MergePotentials.push_back(MergePotentialsElt(HashEndOfMBB(PBB, 1U), - *P)); + MergePotentials.push_back(MergePotentialsElt(HashEndOfMBB(PBB), *P)); } } if (MergePotentials.size() >= 2) @@ -908,6 +922,29 @@ bool BranchFolder::OptimizeBranches(MachineFunction &MF) { return MadeChange; } +// Blocks should be considered empty if they contain only debug info; +// else the debug info would affect codegen. +static bool IsEmptyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { + if (MBB->empty()) + return true; + for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MBB->begin(), MBBE = MBB->end(); + MBBI!=MBBE; ++MBBI) { + if (!MBBI->isDebugValue()) + return false; + } + return true; +} + +// Blocks with only debug info and branches should be considered the same +// as blocks with only branches. +static bool IsBranchOnlyBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { + MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI, MBBE; + for (MBBI = MBB->begin(), MBBE = MBB->end(); MBBI!=MBBE; ++MBBI) { + if (!MBBI->isDebugValue()) + break; + } + return (MBBI->getDesc().isBranch()); +} /// IsBetterFallthrough - Return true if it would be clearly better to /// fall-through to MBB1 than to fall through into MBB2. This has to return @@ -919,15 +956,21 @@ static bool IsBetterFallthrough(MachineBasicBlock *MBB1, // MBB1 doesn't, we prefer to fall through into MBB1. This allows us to // optimize branches that branch to either a return block or an assert block // into a fallthrough to the return. - if (MBB1->empty() || MBB2->empty()) return false; + if (IsEmptyBlock(MBB1) || IsEmptyBlock(MBB2)) return false; // If there is a clear successor ordering we make sure that one block // will fall through to the next if (MBB1->isSuccessor(MBB2)) return true; if (MBB2->isSuccessor(MBB1)) return false; - MachineInstr *MBB1I = --MBB1->end(); - MachineInstr *MBB2I = --MBB2->end(); + // Neither block consists entirely of debug info (per IsEmptyBlock check), + // so we needn't test for falling off the beginning here. + MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBB1I = --MBB1->end(); + while (MBB1I->isDebugValue()) + --MBB1I; + MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBB2I = --MBB2->end(); + while (MBB2I->isDebugValue()) + --MBB2I; return MBB2I->getDesc().isCall() && !MBB1I->getDesc().isCall(); } @@ -936,6 +979,7 @@ static bool IsBetterFallthrough(MachineBasicBlock *MBB1, bool BranchFolder::OptimizeBlock(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) { bool MadeChange = false; MachineFunction &MF = *MBB->getParent(); + DebugLoc dl; // FIXME: this is nowhere ReoptimizeBlock: MachineFunction::iterator FallThrough = MBB; @@ -945,7 +989,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: // explicitly. Landing pads should not do this since the landing-pad table // points to this block. Blocks with their addresses taken shouldn't be // optimized away. - if (MBB->empty() && !MBB->isLandingPad() && !MBB->hasAddressTaken()) { + if (IsEmptyBlock(MBB) && !MBB->isLandingPad() && !MBB->hasAddressTaken()) { // Dead block? Leave for cleanup later. if (MBB->pred_empty()) return MadeChange; @@ -987,7 +1031,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: TII->RemoveBranch(PrevBB); PriorCond.clear(); if (PriorTBB != MBB) - TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorTBB, 0, PriorCond); + TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorTBB, 0, PriorCond, dl); MadeChange = true; ++NumBranchOpts; goto ReoptimizeBlock; @@ -1026,7 +1070,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: // the condition is false, remove the uncond second branch. if (PriorFBB == MBB) { TII->RemoveBranch(PrevBB); - TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorTBB, 0, PriorCond); + TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorTBB, 0, PriorCond, dl); MadeChange = true; ++NumBranchOpts; goto ReoptimizeBlock; @@ -1039,7 +1083,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: SmallVector NewPriorCond(PriorCond); if (!TII->ReverseBranchCondition(NewPriorCond)) { TII->RemoveBranch(PrevBB); - TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorFBB, 0, NewPriorCond); + TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorFBB, 0, NewPriorCond, dl); MadeChange = true; ++NumBranchOpts; goto ReoptimizeBlock; @@ -1068,22 +1112,6 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: !IsBetterFallthrough(PriorTBB, MBB)) DoTransform = false; - // We don't want to do this transformation if we have control flow like: - // br cond BB2 - // BB1: - // .. - // jmp BBX - // BB2: - // .. - // ret - // - // In this case, we could actually be moving the return block *into* a - // loop! - if (DoTransform && !MBB->succ_empty() && - (!PriorTBB->canFallThrough() || PriorTBB->empty())) - DoTransform = false; - - if (DoTransform) { // Reverse the branch so we will fall through on the previous true cond. SmallVector NewPriorCond(PriorCond); @@ -1092,7 +1120,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: << "To make fallthrough to: " << *PriorTBB << "\n"); TII->RemoveBranch(PrevBB); - TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, MBB, 0, NewPriorCond); + TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, MBB, 0, NewPriorCond, dl); // Move this block to the end of the function. MBB->moveAfter(--MF.end()); @@ -1121,7 +1149,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: SmallVector NewCond(CurCond); if (!TII->ReverseBranchCondition(NewCond)) { TII->RemoveBranch(*MBB); - TII->InsertBranch(*MBB, CurFBB, CurTBB, NewCond); + TII->InsertBranch(*MBB, CurFBB, CurTBB, NewCond, dl); MadeChange = true; ++NumBranchOpts; goto ReoptimizeBlock; @@ -1131,13 +1159,29 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: // If this branch is the only thing in its block, see if we can forward // other blocks across it. if (CurTBB && CurCond.empty() && CurFBB == 0 && - MBB->begin()->getDesc().isBranch() && CurTBB != MBB && + IsBranchOnlyBlock(MBB) && CurTBB != MBB && !MBB->hasAddressTaken()) { // This block may contain just an unconditional branch. Because there can // be 'non-branch terminators' in the block, try removing the branch and // then seeing if the block is empty. TII->RemoveBranch(*MBB); - + // If the only things remaining in the block are debug info, remove these + // as well, so this will behave the same as an empty block in non-debug + // mode. + if (!MBB->empty()) { + bool NonDebugInfoFound = false; + for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB->begin(), E = MBB->end(); + I != E; ++I) { + if (!I->isDebugValue()) { + NonDebugInfoFound = true; + break; + } + } + if (!NonDebugInfoFound) + // Make the block empty, losing the debug info (we could probably + // improve this in some cases.) + MBB->erase(MBB->begin(), MBB->end()); + } // If this block is just an unconditional branch to CurTBB, we can // usually completely eliminate the block. The only case we cannot // completely eliminate the block is when the block before this one @@ -1160,7 +1204,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: PriorFBB = MBB; } TII->RemoveBranch(PrevBB); - TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorTBB, PriorFBB, PriorCond); + TII->InsertBranch(PrevBB, PriorTBB, PriorFBB, PriorCond, dl); } // Iterate through all the predecessors, revectoring each in-turn. @@ -1186,7 +1230,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: if (!NewCurUnAnalyzable && NewCurTBB && NewCurTBB == NewCurFBB) { TII->RemoveBranch(*PMBB); NewCurCond.clear(); - TII->InsertBranch(*PMBB, NewCurTBB, 0, NewCurCond); + TII->InsertBranch(*PMBB, NewCurTBB, 0, NewCurCond, dl); MadeChange = true; ++NumBranchOpts; PMBB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges(NewCurTBB, 0, false); @@ -1206,7 +1250,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: } // Add the branch back if the block is more than just an uncond branch. - TII->InsertBranch(*MBB, CurTBB, 0, CurCond); + TII->InsertBranch(*MBB, CurTBB, 0, CurCond, dl); } } @@ -1246,7 +1290,7 @@ ReoptimizeBlock: if (CurFallsThru) { MachineBasicBlock *NextBB = llvm::next(MachineFunction::iterator(MBB)); CurCond.clear(); - TII->InsertBranch(*MBB, NextBB, 0, CurCond); + TII->InsertBranch(*MBB, NextBB, 0, CurCond, dl); } MBB->moveAfter(PredBB); MadeChange = true;