x86: Require exact match for 'noxsave' command line option
authorDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:01:33 +0000 (14:01 -0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:05:46 +0000 (15:05 -0800)
commitc97aaf68301be4943f3f1aa0943d8150165a8f61
treec58ec5dcc5fba9b272ea3adec9aae3bfd62678c3
parent69c5d32d83e9f2a7cb4dfd5a5c631470e816bf6a
x86: Require exact match for 'noxsave' command line option

commit 2cd3949f702692cf4c5d05b463f19cd706a92dd3 upstream.

We have some very similarly named command-line options:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:__setup("noxsave", x86_xsave_setup);
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:__setup("noxsaveopt", x86_xsaveopt_setup);
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:__setup("noxsaves", x86_xsaves_setup);

__setup() is designed to match options that take arguments, like
"foo=bar" where you would have:

__setup("foo", x86_foo_func...);

The problem is that "noxsave" actually _matches_ "noxsaves" in
the same way that "foo" matches "foo=bar".  If you boot an old
kernel that does not know about "noxsaves" with "noxsaves" on the
command line, it will interpret the argument as "noxsave", which
is not what you want at all.

This makes the "noxsave" handler only return success when it finds
an *exact* match.

[ tglx: We really need to make __setup() more robust. ]

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141111220133.FE053984@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c