Two if statements do the same work, we can merge them to
one. And fix some typos. There is just code simplification,
no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
for (i = 0; i < n_elt; i++) {
id = ntohs(hmacs->hmac_ids[i]);
for (i = 0; i < n_elt; i++) {
id = ntohs(hmacs->hmac_ids[i]);
- /* Check the id is in the supported range */
- if (id > SCTP_AUTH_HMAC_ID_MAX) {
- id = 0;
- continue;
- }
-
- /* See is we support the id. Supported IDs have name and
- * length fields set, so that we can allocated and use
+ /* Check the id is in the supported range. And
+ * see if we support the id. Supported IDs have name and
+ * length fields set, so that we can allocate and use
* them. We can safely just check for name, for without the
* name, we can't allocate the TFM.
*/
* them. We can safely just check for name, for without the
* name, we can't allocate the TFM.
*/
- if (!sctp_hmac_list[id].hmac_name) {
+ if (id > SCTP_AUTH_HMAC_ID_MAX ||
+ !sctp_hmac_list[id].hmac_name) {