inta is checked to be zero in a IRQ_NONE branch so afterwards it
cannot be zero as it is never modified.
Signed-off-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
[reword the patch title and fix comment]
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
struct iwl_trans *trans = data;
struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
u32 inta, inta_mask;
struct iwl_trans *trans = data;
struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
u32 inta, inta_mask;
- irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
lockdep_assert_held(&trans_pcie->irq_lock);
lockdep_assert_held(&trans_pcie->irq_lock);
* or due to sporadic interrupts thrown from our NIC. */
if (!inta) {
IWL_DEBUG_ISR(trans, "Ignore interrupt, inta == 0\n");
* or due to sporadic interrupts thrown from our NIC. */
if (!inta) {
IWL_DEBUG_ISR(trans, "Ignore interrupt, inta == 0\n");
+ /*
+ * Re-enable interrupts here since we don't have anything to
+ * service, but only in case the handler won't run. Note that
+ * the handler can be scheduled because of a previous
+ * interrupt.
+ */
+ if (test_bit(STATUS_INT_ENABLED, &trans_pcie->status) &&
+ !trans_pcie->inta)
+ iwl_enable_interrupts(trans);
+ return IRQ_NONE;
}
if ((inta == 0xFFFFFFFF) || ((inta & 0xFFFFFFF0) == 0xa5a5a5a0)) {
}
if ((inta == 0xFFFFFFFF) || ((inta & 0xFFFFFFF0) == 0xa5a5a5a0)) {
trans_pcie->inta |= inta;
/* the thread will service interrupts and re-enable them */
trans_pcie->inta |= inta;
/* the thread will service interrupts and re-enable them */
- if (likely(inta))
- return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
-
- ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
-
-none:
- /* re-enable interrupts here since we don't have anything to service. */
- /* only Re-enable if disabled by irq and no schedules tasklet. */
- if (test_bit(STATUS_INT_ENABLED, &trans_pcie->status) &&
- !trans_pcie->inta)
- iwl_enable_interrupts(trans);
-
- return ret;
+ return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
}
/* interrupt handler using ict table, with this interrupt driver will
}
/* interrupt handler using ict table, with this interrupt driver will