When LSR is replacing an instruction, call
authorDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>
Wed, 21 May 2008 00:54:12 +0000 (00:54 +0000)
committerDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>
Wed, 21 May 2008 00:54:12 +0000 (00:54 +0000)
ScalarEvolution::deleteValueFromRecords on it before doing the
replaceAllUsesWith, because ScalarEvolution looks at the instruction's
users to find SCEV references to the instruction's SCEV object in its
internal maps.

Move all of LSR's loop-related state clearing after processing the loop
and before cleaning up dead PHI nodes. This eliminates all of LSR's SCEV
references just before the calls to ScalarEvolution::deleteValueFromRecords
so that when ScalarEvolution drops its own SCEV references, the reference
counts will reach zero and the SCEVs will be deleted immediately.

These changes fix some compiler aborts involving ScalarEvolution holding
onto and reusing SCEV objects for instructions that have been deleted.
No regression test unfortunately; because the symptoms were due to
dangling pointers, reduced testcases ended up being fairly arbitrary.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp

index d9371d2da5d76dbcf1526bed69505d1237584233..c65b83e9a56a5f9c77906f4c7075eff753c5f6f8 100644 (file)
@@ -237,8 +237,8 @@ DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,16> &Insts) {
       if (Value *PNV = PN->hasConstantValue()) {
         if (Instruction *U = dyn_cast<Instruction>(PNV))
           Insts.insert(U);
-        PN->replaceAllUsesWith(PNV);
         SE->deleteValueFromRecords(PN);
+        PN->replaceAllUsesWith(PNV);
         PN->eraseFromParent();
         Changed = true;
         continue;
@@ -1663,8 +1663,8 @@ ICmpInst *LoopStrengthReduce::ChangeCompareStride(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
 
     // Remove the old compare instruction. The old indvar is probably dead too.
     DeadInsts.insert(cast<Instruction>(CondUse->OperandValToReplace));
-    OldCond->replaceAllUsesWith(Cond);
     SE->deleteValueFromRecords(OldCond);
+    OldCond->replaceAllUsesWith(Cond);
     OldCond->eraseFromParent();
 
     IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].Users.pop_back();
@@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@ bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
 #endif
 
   // IVsByStride keeps IVs for one particular loop.
-  IVsByStride.clear();
+  assert(IVsByStride.empty() && "Stale entries in IVsByStride?");
 
   // Sort the StrideOrder so we process larger strides first.
   std::stable_sort(StrideOrder.begin(), StrideOrder.end(), StrideCompare());
@@ -1799,6 +1799,12 @@ bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
     StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(SI->first, SI->second, L, HasOneStride);
   }
 
+  // We're done analyzing this loop; release all the state we built up for it.
+  CastedPointers.clear();
+  IVUsesByStride.clear();
+  IVsByStride.clear();
+  StrideOrder.clear();
+
   // Clean up after ourselves
   if (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
     DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(DeadInsts);
@@ -1826,8 +1832,8 @@ bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
           if (BO->hasOneUse() && PN == *(BO->use_begin())) {
             DeadInsts.insert(BO);
             // Break the cycle, then delete the PHI.
-            PN->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(PN->getType()));
             SE->deleteValueFromRecords(PN);
+            PN->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(PN->getType()));
             PN->eraseFromParent();
           }
         }
@@ -1836,8 +1842,5 @@ bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
     DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(DeadInsts);
   }
 
-  CastedPointers.clear();
-  IVUsesByStride.clear();
-  StrideOrder.clear();
   return false;
 }