The pattern !E && !E->fld is nonsensical. The patch below updates this
according to the assumption that && should be ||. But perhaps another
solution was intended.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@disable and_comm@
expression E;
identifier fld;
@@
- !E && !E->fld
+ !E || !E->fld
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
for(slot = ctrl->slot; slot; slot = slot->next) {
if (slot->device == (hp_slot + ctrl->slot_device_offset))
continue;
- if (!slot->hotplug_slot && !slot->hotplug_slot->info)
+ if (!slot->hotplug_slot || !slot->hotplug_slot->info)
continue;
if (slot->hotplug_slot->info->adapter_status == 0)
continue;