+++ /dev/null
-; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | FileCheck %s
-
-@X = global i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
-
-declare void @foo()
-
-; This testcase tests for a problem where LICM hoists
-; potentially trapping instructions when they are not guaranteed to execute.
-define i32 @test1(i1 %c) {
-; CHECK: @test1
- %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=2]
- br label %Loop
-Loop: ; preds = %LoopTail, %0
- call void @foo( )
- br i1 %c, label %LoopTail, label %IfUnEqual
-
-IfUnEqual: ; preds = %Loop
-; CHECK: IfUnEqual:
-; CHECK-NEXT: sdiv i32 4, %A
- %B1 = sdiv i32 4, %A ; <i32> [#uses=1]
- br label %LoopTail
-
-LoopTail: ; preds = %IfUnEqual, %Loop
- %B = phi i32 [ 0, %Loop ], [ %B1, %IfUnEqual ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
- br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out: ; preds = %LoopTail
- %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
- ret i32 %C
-}
-
-
-declare void @foo2(i32)
-
-
-;; It is ok and desirable to hoist this potentially trapping instruction.
-define i32 @test2(i1 %c) {
-; CHECK: @test2
-; CHECK-NEXT: load i32* @X
-; CHECK-NEXT: %B = sdiv i32 4, %A
- %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=2]
- br label %Loop
-Loop:
- ;; Should have hoisted this div!
- %B = sdiv i32 4, %A ; <i32> [#uses=2]
- call void @foo2( i32 %B )
- br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out: ; preds = %Loop
- %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
- ret i32 %C
-}
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | FileCheck %s
+
+@X = global i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
+
+declare void @foo()
+
+; This testcase tests for a problem where LICM hoists
+; potentially trapping instructions when they are not guaranteed to execute.
+define i32 @test1(i1 %c) {
+; CHECK: @test1
+ %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ br label %Loop
+Loop: ; preds = %LoopTail, %0
+ call void @foo( )
+ br i1 %c, label %LoopTail, label %IfUnEqual
+
+IfUnEqual: ; preds = %Loop
+; CHECK: IfUnEqual:
+; CHECK-NEXT: sdiv i32 4, %A
+ %B1 = sdiv i32 4, %A ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br label %LoopTail
+
+LoopTail: ; preds = %IfUnEqual, %Loop
+ %B = phi i32 [ 0, %Loop ], [ %B1, %IfUnEqual ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %LoopTail
+ %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %C
+}
+
+
+declare void @foo2(i32)
+
+
+;; It is ok and desirable to hoist this potentially trapping instruction.
+define i32 @test2(i1 %c) {
+; CHECK: @test2
+; CHECK-NEXT: load i32* @X
+; CHECK-NEXT: %B = sdiv i32 4, %A
+ %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ br label %Loop
+Loop:
+ ;; Should have hoisted this div!
+ %B = sdiv i32 4, %A ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ call void @foo2( i32 %B )
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %C
+}