static void emitDwarfRegOp(const AsmPrinter &AP, int Reg) {
assert(Reg >= 0);
if (Reg < 32) {
- AP.OutStreamer.AddComment(dwarf::
- OperationEncodingString(dwarf::DW_OP_reg0 + Reg));
+ AP.OutStreamer.AddComment(
+ dwarf::OperationEncodingString(dwarf::DW_OP_reg0 + Reg));
AP.EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_reg0 + Reg);
} else {
AP.OutStreamer.AddComment("DW_OP_regx");
int Reg, int Offset, bool Deref) {
assert(Reg >= 0);
if (Reg < 32) {
- AP.OutStreamer.AddComment(dwarf::
- OperationEncodingString(dwarf::DW_OP_breg0 + Reg));
+ AP.OutStreamer.AddComment(
+ dwarf::OperationEncodingString(dwarf::DW_OP_breg0 + Reg));
AP.EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_breg0 + Reg);
} else {
AP.OutStreamer.AddComment("DW_OP_bregx");
if (Indirect || MLoc.isIndirect()) {
// FIXME: We have no reasonable way of handling errors in here. The
// caller might be in the middle of a dwarf expression. We should
- // probably assert that Reg >= 0 once debug info generation is more mature.
- OutStreamer.AddComment("nop (invalid dwarf register number for indirect loc)");
+ // probably assert that Reg >= 0 once debug info generation is more
+ // mature.
+ OutStreamer.AddComment(
+ "nop (invalid dwarf register number for indirect loc)");
EmitInt8(dwarf::DW_OP_nop);
return;
}