operators.
The test difference is just due to the multiplication operands
being commuted (and thus requiring a more elaborate match). In
optimized code, that expression would be folded.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@96816
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
// it is casted back to a pointer, see if the expression can be
// converted into a GEP.
if (CE->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add)
- if (ConstantInt *L = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(CE->getOperand(0)))
- if (ConstantExpr *R = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(CE->getOperand(1)))
+ if (ConstantInt *L = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(CE->getOperand(1)))
+ if (ConstantExpr *R = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(CE->getOperand(0)))
if (R->getOpcode() == Instruction::PtrToInt)
if (GlobalVariable *GV =
dyn_cast<GlobalVariable>(R->getOperand(0))) {
return ConstantExpr::getLShr(C1, C2);
break;
}
+ } else if (isa<ConstantInt>(C1)) {
+ // If C1 is a ConstantInt and C2 is not, swap the operands.
+ if (Instruction::isCommutative(Opcode))
+ return ConstantExpr::get(Opcode, C2, C1);
}
// At this point we know neither constant is an UndefValue.
; CHECK: .globl x
; CHECK: x:
-; CHECK: .quad 3
+; CHECK: .quad ((0+1)&4294967295)*3
@x = global i64 mul (i64 3, i64 ptrtoint (i2* getelementptr (i2* null, i64 1) to i64))