SDValue N1_0 = N1->getOperand(0);
SDValue N1_1 = N1->getOperand(1);
SDValue N1_2 = N1->getOperand(2);
- if (N1_2 == N2) {
+ if (N1_2 == N2 && N0.getValueType() == N1_0.getValueType()) {
// Create the actual and node if we can generate good code for it.
if (!TLI.shouldNormalizeToSelectSequence(*DAG.getContext(), VT)) {
SDValue And = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, SDLoc(N), N0.getValueType(),
SDValue N2_0 = N2->getOperand(0);
SDValue N2_1 = N2->getOperand(1);
SDValue N2_2 = N2->getOperand(2);
- if (N2_1 == N1) {
+ if (N2_1 == N1 && N0.getValueType() == N2_0.getValueType()) {
// Create the actual or node if we can generate good code for it.
if (!TLI.shouldNormalizeToSelectSequence(*DAG.getContext(), VT)) {
SDValue Or = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, SDLoc(N), N0.getValueType(),
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: llc -o - %s
+; The selection DAG select(select()) normalisation crashed for different types
+; on the condition inputs.
+target datalayout = "E-m:m-p:32:32-i8:8:32-i16:16:32-i64:64-n32-S64"
+target triple = "mips--"
+
+define i64 @foobar(double %a) #0 {
+entry:
+ %0 = bitcast double %a to i64
+ %trunc = trunc i64 %0 to i32
+ %and = and i32 %trunc, 32767
+ %sub = add nsw i32 %and, -16383
+ %cmp = icmp ugt i32 %and, 16382
+ %and5 = and i32 %trunc, 32768
+ %tobool = icmp eq i32 %and5, 0
+ %or = and i1 %cmp, %tobool
+ %cmp6 = icmp ugt i32 %sub, 64
+ %sext = sext i1 %cmp6 to i64
+ %retval.0 = select i1 %or, i64 %sext, i64 0
+ ret i64 %retval.0
+}