When comparing a zero-extended value against a constant small enough to
be in range of the inner type, it doesn't matter whether a signed or
unsigned compare operation (for the outer type) is being used. This is
why the code in adjustSubwordCmp had this assertion:
assert(C.ICmpType == SystemZICMP::Any &&
"Signedness shouldn't matter here.");
assuming the the caller had already detected that fact. However, it
turns out that there cases, in particular with always-true or always-
false conditions that have not been eliminated when compiling at -O0,
where this is not true.
Instead of failing an assertion if C.ICmpType is not SystemZICMP::Any
here, we can simply *set* it safely to SystemZICMP::Any, however.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@255786
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
} else if (Load->getExtensionType() == ISD::ZEXTLOAD) {
if (Value > Mask)
return;
- assert(C.ICmpType == SystemZICMP::Any &&
- "Signedness shouldn't matter here.");
+ // If the constant is in range, we can use any comparison.
+ C.ICmpType = SystemZICMP::Any;
} else
return;
--- /dev/null
+; This used to crash the backend due to a failed assertion.
+; No particular output expected, but must compile.
+;
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=s390x-linux-gnu
+
+define void @test(i16 *%input, i32 *%result) {
+entry:
+ %0 = load i16, i16* %input, align 2
+ %1 = zext i16 %0 to i32
+ %2 = icmp slt i32 %1, 0
+ br i1 %2, label %if.then, label %if.else
+
+if.then:
+ store i32 1, i32* %result, align 4
+ br label %return
+
+if.else:
+ store i32 0, i32* %result, align 4
+ br label %return
+
+return:
+ ret void
+}
+