}
setOperationAction(ISD::ConstantFP, MVT::f32, Custom);
+ setOperationAction(ISD::ConstantFP, MVT::f64, Custom);
if (Subtarget->hasNEON()) {
addDRTypeForNEON(MVT::v2f32);
SDValue ARMTargetLowering::LowerConstantFP(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG,
const ARMSubtarget *ST) const {
- if (!ST->useNEONForSinglePrecisionFP() || !ST->hasVFP3() || ST->hasD16())
+ if (!ST->hasVFP3())
return SDValue();
+ bool IsDouble = Op.getValueType() == MVT::f64;
ConstantFPSDNode *CFP = cast<ConstantFPSDNode>(Op);
- assert(Op.getValueType() == MVT::f32 &&
- "ConstantFP custom lowering should only occur for f32.");
// Try splatting with a VMOV.f32...
APFloat FPVal = CFP->getValueAPF();
- int ImmVal = ARM_AM::getFP32Imm(FPVal);
+ int ImmVal = IsDouble ? ARM_AM::getFP64Imm(FPVal) : ARM_AM::getFP32Imm(FPVal);
+
if (ImmVal != -1) {
+ if (IsDouble || !ST->useNEONForSinglePrecisionFP()) {
+ // We have code in place to select a valid ConstantFP already, no need to
+ // do any mangling.
+ return Op;
+ }
+
+ // It's a float and we are trying to use NEON operations where
+ // possible. Lower it to a splat followed by an extract.
SDLoc DL(Op);
SDValue NewVal = DAG.getTargetConstant(ImmVal, MVT::i32);
SDValue VecConstant = DAG.getNode(ARMISD::VMOVFPIMM, DL, MVT::v2f32,
DAG.getConstant(0, MVT::i32));
}
- // If that fails, try a VMOV.i32
+ // The rest of our options are NEON only, make sure that's allowed before
+ // proceeding..
+ if (!ST->hasNEON() || (!IsDouble && !ST->useNEONForSinglePrecisionFP()))
+ return SDValue();
+
EVT VMovVT;
- unsigned iVal = FPVal.bitcastToAPInt().getZExtValue();
- SDValue NewVal = isNEONModifiedImm(iVal, 0, 32, DAG, VMovVT, false,
- VMOVModImm);
+ uint64_t iVal = FPVal.bitcastToAPInt().getZExtValue();
+
+ // It wouldn't really be worth bothering for doubles except for one very
+ // important value, which does happen to match: 0.0. So make sure we don't do
+ // anything stupid.
+ if (IsDouble && (iVal & 0xffffffff) != (iVal >> 32))
+ return SDValue();
+
+ // Try a VMOV.i32 (FIXME: i8, i16, or i64 could work too).
+ SDValue NewVal = isNEONModifiedImm(iVal & 0xffffffffU, 0, 32, DAG, VMovVT,
+ false, VMOVModImm);
if (NewVal != SDValue()) {
SDLoc DL(Op);
SDValue VecConstant = DAG.getNode(ARMISD::VMOVIMM, DL, VMovVT,
NewVal);
+ if (IsDouble)
+ return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MVT::f64, VecConstant);
+
+ // It's a float: cast and extract a vector element.
SDValue VecFConstant = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MVT::v2f32,
VecConstant);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, DL, MVT::f32, VecFConstant,
}
// Finally, try a VMVN.i32
- NewVal = isNEONModifiedImm(~iVal & 0xffffffff, 0, 32, DAG, VMovVT, false,
- VMVNModImm);
+ NewVal = isNEONModifiedImm(~iVal & 0xffffffffU, 0, 32, DAG, VMovVT,
+ false, VMVNModImm);
if (NewVal != SDValue()) {
SDLoc DL(Op);
SDValue VecConstant = DAG.getNode(ARMISD::VMVNIMM, DL, VMovVT, NewVal);
+
+ if (IsDouble)
+ return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MVT::f64, VecConstant);
+
+ // It's a float: cast and extract a vector element.
SDValue VecFConstant = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MVT::v2f32,
VecConstant);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, DL, MVT::f32, VecFConstant,
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=armv7 -mattr=+neon -mcpu=swift %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=armv7 -mattr=+neon -mcpu=cortex-a8 %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NONEONFP %s
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=armv7 -mattr=-neon -mcpu=cortex-a8 %s -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NONEON %s
+
+define arm_aapcs_vfpcc float @test_vmov_f32() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_vmov_f32:
+; CHECK: vmov.f32 d0, #1.0
+
+; CHECK-NONEONFP: vmov.f32 s0, #1.0
+ ret float 1.0
+}
+
+define arm_aapcs_vfpcc float @test_vmov_imm() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_vmov_imm:
+; CHECK: vmov.i32 d0, #0
+
+; CHECK-NONEON-LABEL: test_vmov_imm:
+; CHECK_NONEON: vldr s0, {{.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}
+ ret float 0.0
+}
+
+define arm_aapcs_vfpcc float @test_vmvn_imm() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_vmvn_imm:
+; CHECK: vmvn.i32 d0, #0xb0000000
+
+; CHECK-NONEON-LABEL: test_vmvn_imm:
+; CHECK_NONEON: vldr s0, {{.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}
+ ret float 8589934080.0
+}
+
+define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @test_vmov_f64() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_vmov_f64:
+; CHECK: vmov.f64 d0, #1.0
+
+; CHECK-NONEON-LABEL: test_vmov_f64:
+; CHECK_NONEON: vmov.f64 d0, #1.0
+
+ ret double 1.0
+}
+
+define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @test_vmov_double_imm() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_vmov_double_imm:
+; CHECK: vmov.i32 d0, #0
+
+; CHECK-NONEON-LABEL: test_vmov_double_imm:
+; CHECK_NONEON: vldr d0, {{.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}
+ ret double 0.0
+}
+
+define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @test_vmvn_double_imm() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_vmvn_double_imm:
+; CHECK: vmvn.i32 d0, #0xb0000000
+
+; CHECK-NONEON-LABEL: test_vmvn_double_imm:
+; CHECK_NONEON: vldr d0, {{.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}
+ ret double 0x4fffffff4fffffff
+}
+
+; Make sure we don't ignore the high half of 64-bit values when deciding whether
+; a vmov/vmvn is possible.
+define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @test_notvmvn_double_imm() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test_notvmvn_double_imm:
+; CHECK: vldr d0, {{.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}
+
+; CHECK-NONEON-LABEL: test_notvmvn_double_imm:
+; CHECK_NONEON: vldr d0, {{.?LCPI[0-9]+_[0-9]+}}
+ ret double 0x4fffffffffffffff
+}