btrfs: properly handle overlapping areas in memmove_extent_buffer
authorSergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:52:52 +0000 (21:52 +0000)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:25:06 +0000 (20:25 -0400)
Fix data corruption caused by memcpy() usage on overlapping data.
I've observed it first when found out usermode linux crash on btrfs.

?all chain is the following:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at /home/slyfox/linux-2.6/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3900 memcpy_extent_buffer+0x1a5/0x219()
Call Trace:
6fa39a58:  [<601b495e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x1c
6fa39a68:  [<60029ad9>] warn_slowpath_common+0x59/0x70
6fa39aa8:  [<60029b05>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17
6fa39ab8:  [<600efc97>] memcpy_extent_buffer+0x1a5/0x219
6fa39b48:  [<600efd9f>] memmove_extent_buffer+0x94/0x208
6fa39bc8:  [<600becbf>] btrfs_del_items+0x214/0x473
6fa39c78:  [<600ce1b0>] btrfs_delete_one_dir_name+0x7c/0xda
6fa39cc8:  [<600dad6b>] __btrfs_unlink_inode+0xad/0x25d
6fa39d08:  [<600d7864>] btrfs_start_transaction+0xe/0x10
6fa39d48:  [<600dc9ff>] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x1b/0x3b
6fa39d78:  [<600e04bc>] btrfs_unlink+0x70/0xef
6fa39dc8:  [<6007f0d0>] vfs_unlink+0x58/0xa3
6fa39df8:  [<60080278>] do_unlinkat+0xd4/0x162
6fa39e48:  [<600517db>] call_rcu_sched+0xe/0x10
6fa39e58:  [<600452a8>] __put_cred+0x58/0x5a
6fa39e78:  [<6007446c>] sys_faccessat+0x154/0x166
6fa39ed8:  [<60080317>] sys_unlink+0x11/0x13
6fa39ee8:  [<60016b80>] handle_syscall+0x58/0x70
6fa39f08:  [<60021377>] userspace+0x2d4/0x381
6fa39fc8:  [<60014507>] fork_handler+0x62/0x69
---[ end trace 70b0ca2ef0266b93 ]---

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg09302.html

Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c

index 77c65a0bea343d08bcd5df51f5b6e9faa5ec1068..864e0496cc1c5f0f33ac430cc818110cbce9d8cf 100644 (file)
@@ -3885,6 +3885,12 @@ static void move_pages(struct page *dst_page, struct page *src_page,
        kunmap_atomic(dst_kaddr, KM_USER0);
 }
 
+static inline bool areas_overlap(unsigned long src, unsigned long dst, unsigned long len)
+{
+       unsigned long distance = (src > dst) ? src - dst : dst - src;
+       return distance < len;
+}
+
 static void copy_pages(struct page *dst_page, struct page *src_page,
                       unsigned long dst_off, unsigned long src_off,
                       unsigned long len)
@@ -3892,10 +3898,12 @@ static void copy_pages(struct page *dst_page, struct page *src_page,
        char *dst_kaddr = kmap_atomic(dst_page, KM_USER0);
        char *src_kaddr;
 
-       if (dst_page != src_page)
+       if (dst_page != src_page) {
                src_kaddr = kmap_atomic(src_page, KM_USER1);
-       else
+       } else {
                src_kaddr = dst_kaddr;
+               BUG_ON(areas_overlap(src_off, dst_off, len));
+       }
 
        memcpy(dst_kaddr + dst_off, src_kaddr + src_off, len);
        kunmap_atomic(dst_kaddr, KM_USER0);
@@ -3970,7 +3978,7 @@ void memmove_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *dst, unsigned long dst_offset,
                       "len %lu len %lu\n", dst_offset, len, dst->len);
                BUG_ON(1);
        }
-       if (dst_offset < src_offset) {
+       if (!areas_overlap(src_offset, dst_offset, len)) {
                memcpy_extent_buffer(dst, dst_offset, src_offset, len);
                return;
        }