Remove EXPERIMENTAL from NFS_FSCACHE
authorChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:25:14 +0000 (17:25 +0000)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:22:35 +0000 (17:22 -0800)
There's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile NFS_FSCACHE
(and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard Ubuntu kernel.
However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL, this won't happen.

As Arjan van de Ven pointed out[1], the EXPERIMENTAL flag doesn't mean that
much any more, I propose the following patch to fs/nfs/Kconfig.  I'd do the
same for fs/9p/Kconfig and fs/afs/Kconfig, but as I did not test 9p or AFS, I
feel it would not be appropriate for me to remove the flag.

[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/440522/comments/5
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/23/145

Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
fs/nfs/Kconfig

index 59e5673b45975f03fdd2ea0f24b4541ba9c2dfc2..a43d07e7b9242addd57f704f5a65d15e0bae9813 100644 (file)
@@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ config ROOT_NFS
          Most people say N here.
 
 config NFS_FSCACHE
-       bool "Provide NFS client caching support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
-       depends on EXPERIMENTAL
+       bool "Provide NFS client caching support"
        depends on NFS_FS=m && FSCACHE || NFS_FS=y && FSCACHE=y
        help
          Say Y here if you want NFS data to be cached locally on disc through