Slight language tweak from Jonathan Humphreys.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210327 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/docs/LangRef.rst b/docs/LangRef.rst
index 9bfd3ed2c4970d65d616d06d24b1a0b1e0164033..d246e469fb248ece28e904b639030dd37a5d9ba5 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/LangRef.rst
+++ b/docs/LangRef.rst
@@ -2828,7 +2828,7 @@ with the same loop identifier.
 Precisely, given two instructions ``m1`` and ``m2`` that both have the 
 ``llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access`` metadata, with ``L1`` and ``L2`` being the 
 set of loops associated with that metadata, respectively, then there is no loop 
-carried dependence between ``m1`` and ``m2`` for loops ``L1`` or 
+carried dependence between ``m1`` and ``m2`` for loops in both ``L1`` and 
 ``L2``.
 
 As a special case, if all memory accessing instructions in a loop have