Actually, semantical doesn't appear to be a word.
authorJeff Cohen <jeffc@jolt-lang.org>
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:03:17 +0000 (21:03 +0000)
committerJeff Cohen <jeffc@jolt-lang.org>
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:03:17 +0000 (21:03 +0000)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@27983 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

docs/FAQ.html

index 6129bd2554e2b235f48cfadb28133cfa5b33eddf..e015f91df5493f81367f5561b760183c6bd44543 100644 (file)
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ rebuilding.</p>
   <p>Currently, there isn't much. LLVM supports an intermediate representation
   which is useful for code representation but will not support the high level
   (abstract syntax tree) representation needed by most compilers. There are no
-  facilities for lexical nor semantical analysis. There is, however, a <i>mostly
+  facilities for lexical nor semantic analysis. There is, however, a <i>mostly
     implemented</i> configuration-driven 
   <a href="CompilerDriver.html">compiler driver</a> which simplifies the task
   of running optimizations, linking, and executable generation.</p>