if (!shouldRewriteStatepointsIn(F))
return false;
- // Gather all the statepoints which need rewritten.
+ DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
+
+ // Gather all the statepoints which need rewritten. Be careful to only
+ // consider those in reachable code since we need to ask dominance queries
+ // when rewriting. We'll delete the unreachable ones in a moment.
SmallVector<CallSite, 64> ParsePointNeeded;
+ SmallVector<CallSite, 16> UnreachableStatepoints;
for (Instruction &I : inst_range(F)) {
// TODO: only the ones with the flag set!
- if (isStatepoint(I))
- ParsePointNeeded.push_back(CallSite(&I));
+ if (isStatepoint(I)) {
+ if (DT.isReachableFromEntry(I.getParent()))
+ ParsePointNeeded.push_back(CallSite(&I));
+ else
+ UnreachableStatepoints.push_back(CallSite(&I));
+ }
}
+ bool MadeChange = false;
+
+ // Delete any unreachable statepoints so that we don't have unrewritten
+ // statepoints surviving this pass. This makes testing easier and the
+ // resulting IR less confusing to human readers. Rather than be fancy, we
+ // just reuse a utility function which removes the unreachable blocks.
+ if (!UnreachableStatepoints.empty())
+ MadeChange |= removeUnreachableBlocks(F);
+
// Return early if no work to do.
if (ParsePointNeeded.empty())
- return false;
+ return MadeChange;
+
+ // As a prepass, go ahead and aggressively destroy single entry phi nodes.
+ // These are created by LCSSA. They have the effect of increasing the size
+ // of liveness sets for no good reason. It may be harder to do this post
+ // insertion since relocations and base phis can confuse things.
+ for (BasicBlock &BB : F)
+ if (BB.getUniquePredecessor()) {
+ MadeChange = true;
+ FoldSingleEntryPHINodes(&BB);
+ }
- DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
- return insertParsePoints(F, DT, this, ParsePointNeeded);
+ MadeChange |= insertParsePoints(F, DT, this, ParsePointNeeded);
+ return MadeChange;
}
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: opt -rewrite-statepoints-for-gc -S < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+declare void @consume(...)
+
+; Test to make sure we destroy LCSSA's single entry phi nodes before
+; running liveness
+define void @test6(i64 addrspace(1)* %obj) gc "statepoint-example" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test6
+entry:
+ br label %next
+
+next:
+; CHECK-LABEL: next:
+; CHECK-NEXT: gc.statepoint
+; CHECK-NEXT: gc.relocate
+; CHECK-NEXT: @consume(i64 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated)
+; CHECK-NEXT: @consume(i64 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated)
+ %obj2 = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj, %entry ]
+ call i32 (void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
+ call void (...)* @consume(i64 addrspace(1)* %obj2)
+ call void (...)* @consume(i64 addrspace(1)* %obj)
+ ret void
+}
+
+declare void @some_call(i64 addrspace(1)*)
+
+; Need to delete unreachable gc.statepoint call
+define void @test7() gc "statepoint-example" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test7
+; CHECK-NOT: gc.statepoint
+ ret void
+
+unreached:
+ %obj = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [null, %unreached]
+ call i32 (void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
+ call void (...)* @consume(i64 addrspace(1)* %obj)
+ br label %unreached
+}
+
+; Need to delete unreachable gc.statepoint invoke - tested seperately given
+; a correct implementation could only remove the instructions, not the block
+define void @test8() gc "statepoint-example" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test8
+; CHECK-NOT: gc.statepoint
+ ret void
+
+unreached:
+ invoke i32 (void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
+ to label %normal_return unwind label %exceptional_return
+
+normal_return: ; preds = %entry
+ ret void
+
+exceptional_return: ; preds = %entry
+ %landing_pad4 = landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i32 ()* undef
+ cleanup
+ ret void
+}
+
+declare void @foo()
+; Bound the last check-not
+; CHECK-LABEL: @foo
+
+declare i32 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(void ()*, i32, i32, ...)
+