[LoopAccesses 3/3] Print the dependences with -analyze

The dependences are now expose through the new getInterestingDependences
API so we can use that with -analyze too and fix the FIXME.

This lets us remove the test that relied on -debug to check the
dependences.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h b/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h
index a9517dd3d353284199ec7d95a44a45ea3a45ab2d..31b0b8eb21dd31673d9b465c80827535853c0387 100644 (file)
--- a/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h
+++ b/include/llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h
@@ -149,6 +149,9 @@ public:
       BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding
     };
 
+    /// \brief String version of the types.
+    static const char *DepName[];
+
     /// \brief Index of the source of the dependence in the InstMap vector.
     unsigned Source;
     /// \brief Index of the destination of the dependence in the InstMap vector.
@@ -167,6 +170,11 @@ public:
 
     /// \brief Lexically backward dependence types.
     bool isPossiblyBackward() const;
+
+    /// \brief Print the dependence.  \p Instr is used to map the instruction
+    /// indices to instructions.
+    void print(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth,
+               const SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *> &Instrs) const;
   };
 
   MemoryDepChecker(ScalarEvolution *Se, const Loop *L)

diff --git a/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp b/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
index a8f80545adc384b0ebd7bfb718c8e466026fa09a..b0553364b6cf1dd9753251f6e795ec16080533ec 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp
@@ -835,6 +835,18 @@ bool MemoryDepChecker::areDepsSafe(DepCandidates &AccessSets,
   return SafeForVectorization;
 }
 
+const char *MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::DepName[] = {
+    "NoDep", "Unknown", "Forward", "ForwardButPreventsForwarding", "Backward",
+    "BackwardVectorizable", "BackwardVectorizableButPreventsForwarding"};
+
+void MemoryDepChecker::Dependence::print(
+    raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth,
+    const SmallVectorImpl<Instruction *> &Instrs) const {
+  OS.indent(Depth) << DepName[Type] << ":\n";
+  OS.indent(Depth + 2) << *Instrs[Source] << " -> \n";
+  OS.indent(Depth + 2) << *Instrs[Destination] << "\n";
+}
+
 bool LoopAccessInfo::canAnalyzeLoop() {
     // We can only analyze innermost loops.
   if (!TheLoop->empty()) {
@@ -1281,7 +1293,14 @@ void LoopAccessInfo::print(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth) const {
   if (Report)
     OS.indent(Depth) << "Report: " << Report->str() << "\n";
 
-  // FIXME: Print unsafe dependences
+  if (auto *InterestingDependences = DepChecker.getInterestingDependences()) {
+    OS.indent(Depth) << "Interesting Dependences:\n";
+    for (auto &Dep : *InterestingDependences) {
+      Dep.print(OS, Depth + 2, DepChecker.getMemoryInstructions());
+      OS << "\n";
+    }
+  } else
+    OS.indent(Depth) << "Too many interesting dependences, not recorded\n";
 
   // List the pair of accesses need run-time checks to prove independence.
   PtrRtCheck.print(OS, Depth);

diff --git a/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks-no-dbg.ll b/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks-no-dbg.ll
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 6770f92..0000000
--- a/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks-no-dbg.ll
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
-
-; FIXME: This is the non-debug version of unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll not
-; requiring "asserts".  Once we can check memory dependences without -debug,
-; we should remove this test.
-
-; Analyze this loop:
-;   for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
-;    A[i + 1] = A[i] * B[i] * C[i];
-
-target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
-target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.10.0"
-
-; CHECK: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop
-
-; CHECK: Run-time memory checks:
-; CHECK-NEXT: 0:
-; CHECK-NEXT:   %arrayidxA_plus_2 = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %a, i64 %add
-; CHECK-NEXT:   %arrayidxB = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %b, i64 %storemerge3
-; CHECK-NEXT: 1:
-; CHECK-NEXT:   %arrayidxA_plus_2 = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %a, i64 %add
-; CHECK-NEXT:   %arrayidxC = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %c, i64 %storemerge3
-
-@n = global i32 20, align 4
-@B = common global i16* null, align 8
-@A = common global i16* null, align 8
-@C = common global i16* null, align 8
-
-define void @f() {
-entry:
-  %a = load i16*, i16** @A, align 8
-  %b = load i16*, i16** @B, align 8
-  %c = load i16*, i16** @C, align 8
-  br label %for.body
-
-for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body, %entry
-  %storemerge3 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %for.body ]
-
-  %arrayidxA = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %a, i64 %storemerge3
-  %loadA = load i16, i16* %arrayidxA, align 2
-
-  %arrayidxB = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %b, i64 %storemerge3
-  %loadB = load i16, i16* %arrayidxB, align 2
-
-  %arrayidxC = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %c, i64 %storemerge3
-  %loadC = load i16, i16* %arrayidxC, align 2
-
-  %mul = mul i16 %loadB, %loadA
-  %mul1 = mul i16 %mul, %loadC
-
-  %add = add nuw nsw i64 %storemerge3, 1
-  %arrayidxA_plus_2 = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %a, i64 %add
-  store i16 %mul1, i16* %arrayidxA_plus_2, align 2
-
-  %exitcond = icmp eq i64 %add, 20
-  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
-
-for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.body
-  ret void
-}

diff --git a/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll b/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll
index a7a324bd9a0ee13f7970968b6b3b5ed5a83dade0..a11fd7f3bff6d21a48d1e67ae8653e2450366820 100644 (file)
--- a/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll
+++ b/test/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis/unsafe-and-rt-checks.ll
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
 ; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt -loop-accesses -analyze -debug-only=loop-accesses < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEBUG
-; REQUIRES: asserts
 
 ; Analyze this loop:
 ;   for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
@@ -10,10 +8,10 @@ target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
 target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx10.10.0"
 
 ; CHECK: Report: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop
-
-; DEBUG: LAA: Distance for   %loadA = load i16, i16* %arrayidxA, align 2 to   store i16 %mul1, i16* %arrayidxA_plus_2, align 2: 2
-; DEBUG-NEXT: LAA: Failure because of Positive distance 2
-
+; CHECK-NEXT: Interesting Dependences:
+; CHECK-NEXT:   Backward:
+; CHECK-NEXT:     %loadA = load i16, i16* %arrayidxA, align 2 ->
+; CHECK-NEXT:     store i16 %mul1, i16* %arrayidxA_plus_2, align 2
 ; CHECK: Run-time memory checks:
 ; CHECK-NEXT: 0:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:   %arrayidxA_plus_2 = getelementptr inbounds i16, i16* %a, i64 %add