bpf: Use the getSubtarget call off of the MachineFunction rather than the TargetMachine

Summary:
Hi Eric,

this patch cleans up the layering violation that you're fixing across backends.
Anything else I need to fix on bpf backend side?

Thanks

Reviewers: echristo

Reviewed By: echristo

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7355

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227865 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
index 543c79a9c6318c5e74a2f28f2b038c4cb68efcce..64ac515fbfce36118185a3807c9c007a99d5b920 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFISelLowering.cpp
@@ -539,8 +539,7 @@ BPFTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter(MachineInstr *MI,
                                                MachineBasicBlock *BB) const {
   unsigned Opc = MI->getOpcode();
 
-  const TargetInstrInfo &TII =
-      *getTargetMachine().getSubtargetImpl()->getInstrInfo();
+  const TargetInstrInfo &TII = *BB->getParent()->getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
   DebugLoc DL = MI->getDebugLoc();
 
   assert(Opc == BPF::Select && "Unexpected instr type to insert");