This reverts commit r225498 (but leaves r225499, which was a worthy
cleanup).
My plan was to change `DEBUG_LOC` to store the `MDNode` directly rather
than its operands (patch was to go out this morning), but on reflection
it's not clear that it's strictly better. (I had missed that the
current code is unlikely to emit the `MDNode` at all.)
Conflicts:
lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp (due to r225499)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225531
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
FUNC_CODE_INST_CALL = 34, // CALL: [attr, cc, fnty, fnid, args...]
- FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC_OLD = 35, // DEBUG_LOC: [Line,Col,ScopeVal, IAVal]
+ FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC = 35, // DEBUG_LOC: [Line,Col,ScopeVal, IAVal]
FUNC_CODE_INST_FENCE = 36, // FENCE: [ordering, synchscope]
FUNC_CODE_INST_CMPXCHG = 37, // CMPXCHG: [ptrty,ptr,cmp,new, align, vol,
// ordering, synchscope]
I = nullptr;
continue;
- case bitc::FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC_OLD: { // DEBUG_LOC_OLD: [line,col,scope,ia]
+ case bitc::FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC: { // DEBUG_LOC: [line, col, scope, ia]
I = getLastInstruction();
if (!I || Record.size() < 4)
return Error(BitcodeError::InvalidRecord);
Vals.push_back(DL.getCol());
Vals.push_back(Scope ? VE.getMetadataID(Scope) + 1 : 0);
Vals.push_back(IA ? VE.getMetadataID(IA) + 1 : 0);
- Stream.EmitRecord(bitc::FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC_OLD, Vals);
+ Stream.EmitRecord(bitc::FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC, Vals);
Vals.clear();
LastDL = DL;
case bitc::FUNC_CODE_INST_VSELECT: return "INST_VSELECT";
case bitc::FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC_AGAIN: return "DEBUG_LOC_AGAIN";
case bitc::FUNC_CODE_INST_CALL: return "INST_CALL";
- case bitc::FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC_OLD: return "DEBUG_LOC_OLD";
+ case bitc::FUNC_CODE_DEBUG_LOC: return "DEBUG_LOC";
}
case bitc::VALUE_SYMTAB_BLOCK_ID:
switch (CodeID) {