At least not in the interface exposed by ObjectFile. This matches what ELF and
COFF implement.
Adjust existing code that was expecting them to have values. No overall
functionality change intended.
Another option would be to change the interface and the ELF and COFF
implementations to say that the value of a common symbol is its size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241593
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
}
uint64_t MachOObjectFile::getSymbolValue(DataRefImpl Sym) const {
- uint64_t NValue = getNValue(Sym);
MachO::nlist_base Entry = getSymbolTableEntryBase(this, Sym);
- if ((Entry.n_type & MachO::N_TYPE) == MachO::N_UNDF && NValue == 0)
+ if ((Entry.n_type & MachO::N_TYPE) == MachO::N_UNDF)
return UnknownAddress;
- return NValue;
+ return getNValue(Sym);
}
ErrorOr<uint64_t> MachOObjectFile::getSymbolAddress(DataRefImpl Sym) const {
// during the test, we can't hardcode the symbols addresses, so
// look them up here and rewrite them.
for (const auto &Sym : ErrOrObjectFile->symbols()) {
- uint64_t Address = Sym.getValue();
+ uint64_t Address;
+ if (Sym.getFlags() & SymbolRef::SF_Common)
+ Address = Sym.getCommonSize();
+ else
+ Address = Sym.getValue();
ErrorOr<StringRef> Name = Sym.getName();
if (!Name)
continue;
CurrentObjectAddresses.clear();
for (auto Sym : CurrentObjectHolder.Get().symbols()) {
-
- uint64_t Addr = Sym.getValue();
- if (Addr == UnknownAddress)
- continue;
+ uint64_t Addr;
+ if (Sym.getFlags() & SymbolRef::SF_Common) {
+ Addr = Sym.getCommonSize();
+ } else {
+ Addr = Sym.getValue();
+ if (Addr == UnknownAddress)
+ continue;
+ }
ErrorOr<StringRef> Name = Sym.getName();
if (!Name)
continue;