Replacing a range-based for loop with an old-style for loop. This code was previously...

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236990 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/unittests/Support/TargetRegistry.cpp b/unittests/Support/TargetRegistry.cpp
index dd5ef431ae07c087f2a2a1207a52184a9a8f2402..7738e52409402d2472e87655116c6f90ca60ea05 100644 (file)
--- a/unittests/Support/TargetRegistry.cpp
+++ b/unittests/Support/TargetRegistry.cpp
@@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ TEST(TargetRegistry, TargetHasArchType) {
   llvm::InitializeAllTargetInfos();
 
   llvm::TargetRegistry RegistryRoot;
-  for (const auto &Target : RegistryRoot) {
-    StringRef Name = Target.getName();
+  for (auto &I = TargetRegistry::begin(), &E = TargetRegistry::end();
+       I != E; ++I) {
+    StringRef Name = I->getName();
     // There is really no way (at present) to ask a Target whether it targets
     // a specific architecture, because the logic for that is buried in a
     // predicate.