changes.

diff --git a/Robust/src/IR/Flat/BuildCode.java b/Robust/src/IR/Flat/BuildCode.java
index 803c623ea693739353d7812f872536b020383da2..2ff070616836e1bf65a85bee3e8b24b14e0d58e5 100644 (file)
--- a/Robust/src/IR/Flat/BuildCode.java
+++ b/Robust/src/IR/Flat/BuildCode.java
@@ -2724,7 +2724,16 @@ public class BuildCode {
        dynItr = cp.getDynAssignCurr().iterator();
        while( dynItr.hasNext() ) {
          TempDescriptor dynVar = dynItr.next();
-         output.println("   "+dynVar+"_srcSESE = NULL;");
+         
+         // I would like to change the analysis, IF POSSIBLE, to "push" unneeded
+         // variable source tokens away while analyzing a child and "pop" them
+         // back at the child exit, otherwise we sometimes think we should inject
+         // the following code inside a child that is for a parent's variable--in other
+         // words the variable is not dynamically tracked for the child, but should
+         // be by the parent.  Quick fix is to use test to rule out whether we do this
+         if( currentSESE.getDynamicVarSet().contains(dynVar) ) {
+                 output.println("   "+dynVar+"_srcSESE = NULL;");
+         }
        }
        
         // eom
@@ -3390,7 +3399,7 @@ public class BuildCode {
     // before potentially adding this SESE to other forwarding lists,
     //  create it's lock and take it immediately
     output.println("     pthread_mutex_init( &(seseToIssue->common.lock), NULL );");
-    output.println("     pthread_mutex_lock( &(seseToIssue->common.lock) );");
+//    output.println("     pthread_mutex_lock( &(seseToIssue->common.lock) );");
     
     // count up memory conflict dependencies,
     // eom
@@ -3575,7 +3584,7 @@ public class BuildCode {
     
     // release this SESE for siblings to update its dependencies or,
     // eventually, for it to mark itself finished
-    output.println("     pthread_mutex_unlock( &(seseToIssue->common.lock) );");
+    //    output.println("     pthread_mutex_unlock( &(seseToIssue->common.lock) );");
     
     // if there were no outstanding dependencies, issue here
     output.println("     if(  atomic_sub_and_test(10000-localCount,&(seseToIssue->common.unresolvedDependencies) ) ) {");